What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Hi friends,

I want to ask a question: How would you feel if government order you to leave your all your belonging ? You will be looted in a moment. Thats what a dictator does. They only think of development of country in materialistic term not of common people. Can you live without freedom? of course not. So for a country like India which is having diversity in language, religion etc Dictatorship is not a right choice. Instead the existing government should undergoes some reforms. Some of them are as follows:.

1. Decision making process should be accelerated.
2. Effective laws should be made fast.
3. Judgement should be made less time consuming.
4. Feeling of Patriotism should come in every Indian heart.
5. Everyone should try to do reform at grass level.

This series is endless. If I continue this it will look like existing law of Indian government. So stop suggesting and start implementing.

No friends, a dictator is the ideal form of government for India. In this vast country of diverse people, coming to a definite idea is an arduous task. Only a dictator can speed things up. Most of you will may take Adolf Hitler as an example to prove me wrong.

Well friends, Nazi Germany made tremendous progress in a short period of time had the antisemitism element been absent, it would've won the war and we see Adolf as a hero. Also the population in general was happy.

A majority of people would not join politics. So, might as well leave the government in the hands of one capable man who ensures the moral and material progress of the people. Only a dictator can root out social evils. Only a dictator can bring about a surge of intense nationalism.

A leader who as they say can walk with the kings yet not lose the common touch is the ideal leader.

What is dictatorship?

This is the question we should discuss first rather than jumping on a higher level question such as What India need is a Dictatorship.

History is the proof that there may be development at starting in the countries where there was dictatorship but end was not that much appreciable.

In place of having a dictator, our country needs leaders having leadership qualities along with moral values that could inspire other young minds to come in politics and give their contribution in taking their countries from developing the list to developed.

Thus, at last, I would love to mention one thing that besides changing the way of governance we need to work at the moral level of every citizen, instilling the love for the nation. Before taking any action think how this action is going to help your country.

LONG LIVE INDIA.

In my opinion, Even though India is democratic, no one gets an equal opportunity to express their ideas and views regards rules and regulations in the system. People who were rich and had fame can able to give the decisions and ideas. So, how far is it really working? For example, in elections we know that particular candidate encourages corruption still we can't avoid that person because of his name and fame. We can't avoid corruption in our system. If the entire system failed to implement such things if a dictator performs correctly and makes in developing and implementing successfully. Then that particular dictator is good rather than the entire system.

So I would like to say that if dictator performance and ruling is good then entire system. Then it's good to better encourage dictatorship rather than Government system.

Hi friends this is Samyuktha.

So, in my point of view that the dictatorship is not good all the time. Dictatorship means to rule the people at the basis on one condition. So people need democracy They make the people run under the control of rules.

Some of the rulers take the money from the poor people. In olden it has happened.

The advantages of dictatorship are to make the people in a bond of some rules and regulations. For example, wearing of helmet it is safe for the people but some of the people did not care that words and spoiling their lives. So the policeman makes fine on the people who are not having the helmet and pay charges for it.

So I conclude that the dictator who is having the right qualities for the sake of people should be the right person for India. But people should also need democracy for sometimes.

Dear friends,

In our democratic country, there should be no place for dictatorship. We should respect to those who sacrificed their precious lives to get rid of dictatorship of English people for all of us as we are enjoying today. You can remember that time before independence when our brave men like Mahatma Gandhi, Subhash Chandra Bose, Azad, Sukhdev, Bhagat Singh and a large number of freedom fighters fought for us to make our life better than before.

They did not accept dictatorship of English people rather than to run them away to their own country our every freedom fighter made dictator himself (for English people) by following his own principles and values so that Indian people could not face dictatorship of foreigners again. We have fundamental rights under which we use different kind of powers distinctively.

A democracy is literally defined as by the people and for the people. A democracy helps the citizens of a nation stay involved in the happenings of their nation and elect the government that they feel will be the best for them and also gives them a sense of responsibility. The ones who are for dictatorships might say that the government, like in India may turn out to be corrupt and disastrous.

But there will always be someone, someone like Arvind Kejriwal for India who will attempt to solve our problems. In a dictatorship, if the ruler is corrupt, the citizens wouldn't even have any choice to re-elect another leader. Even if they attempt any rebel, they will only face severe punishment, maybe even death. So, I strongly feel that India needs a strong and intelligent leader rather than an oppressive dictator.

Friends lets not forget that dictatorship is all related to skill of convincing people in one direction and no matter then what comes in its way, but looking at India a country who has shown how people can develop, in spite of the different culture traditions and its huge population, where people have different opinions.

In my opinion we set a real good example for world to see how democracy can be practiced without being affected by any barrier and for that I think India do not need dictatorship its happy being democratic and in future it will show why democracy is good for it.

Many of my friends will say that why we still not developed but my dear friends I will ask you to be patient because some things which have thousands opinions need time but don't forget the fruit of patience is always sweet.

Hi friends,

We know that India is a democratic country.

Many people in this country have many problems and have many conflict, but we don't understand that these problems are due to people around us and people with us. Still we blame our government and complain about it.

Some of the things we should know are;

* Our government has one of the bulkiest constitution resulting many conflicts.

* The political leaders are not worried about their duties.

* Youths are not interested to be part of politics just like me and you who want to be doctor, engineer, scientist, businessman, fashion designer, artist and actor but not a politician.

If we would be able to overcome these problems then there would be no need of any other type of government because the way of our government{democratic} would be great.

Dictatorship is not necessary for modern India. As government of India has framed the constitution in such a way that there will be ensured security for all communities such as minorities women and children. There is a strong defence forces against corruption, and other backlogs in India. Still some hurdles are are going in India. Dictatorship is not in useful in any manner in India. Because it is under the rule of a monopoly and he will do as he likes. If he is a good man we can adjust to him. But when he is wicked no one can adjust him. In the case of yemen who ruled uganda a country in africa and hitler who ruled Germany this has happened. In a democratic country like India the govt is by the people for the people and to the people so people should elect a responsible and courteous person to rule.