What India needs is a Dictatorship?

I think India needs dictatorship as for last 68 years we have democracy and we can see the rate of our development had there been a good dictator in India it would have shown spectacular growth till today votes are been purchased by corrupt leaders the illiterate are been exploited badly as they do not have a say in choosing leaders on the basis that he or she will further take India to great heights but for certain amount of money because of poverty in India moreover I think so as if India needs a dictator who can indeed make India a developed nation from a developing one all I want to say that India don't need a dictator like a fanatic leader it needs a good leader who should be secular more importantly a quite genius to look after diversities related issues then I am quite sure we would be far better in China it achieved great heights in 60 years as America has done in past 200 years in India judiciary here is quite slow let us look forward to a country like India being governed by someone say good leader or more accurately a dictator.

Yes! India definitely needs dictatorship because a country's development need suggestions but not advices of each individual. There will always be pros and cons of each decision taken. For instance why do we have elections at each level? to elect at area level then at state level then at country level. Electing one politician has become a tug of war right inside the country which literally weakens the strength of our country, instead if we have one dictator or rather a leader to rule but with that too, many citizens wouldn't agree so an alternative to that might be in such a way that a citizen do not lose his/her list of freedom but still they are bound to laws of country which might be decided by the dictator. Talking about the dictator might be elected directly instead of electing between two political parties. If the dictator works with a wrong motif for a country then it is possible, that individual can be dethroned and can be considered the least respected citizen. So the idea is to keep India under part Dictatorship.

I think India needs dictatorship. India cannot develop until her people are held by a fixed pole and for that we need a dictator.

Many of you may think that a dictator in India can become a reality because of India's diversity. But Indians do share a common past. That spirit can only hold Indians together. That happened during colonial period and so it can happen now too. So before we talk about any other qualities of an Indian dictator we must make sure that he is a true nationalist.

Now some of you may also think that even if India gets a good dictator what will happen after he dies. The answer is also given in our history books. One generation of nationalists created the next. In this way the struggle against the British continued. So the same principle can be applied for a dictator too as he should be perhaps the greatest of all revolutionaries.

India can never become a superpower until the ideology of 'one people one nation one leader' is popularised and is practised among the people of this country.

Dictatorship will make it worse. Dictatorship will only work if a dictator wants to do something for his country but unlimited power. I don't think so dictatorship is gonna work. Government need's to change its policies. We can solve our country's problem in two ways :-

1. Our parliament should amend the constitution and give power to supreme court so that every single bill or law which is passing in parliament must be approved by supreme court both are the different systems of democracy which will limit misuse of power by the members of parliament. If there a corruption case against a minister than it is must for investigation agencies to submit report to the supreme court within 1 year and supreme court must have to take its judgment under 1 month.

2. Second there should be a minimum qualification requirement for every member of a party to fight election or a competitive examination to be eligible for taking part in election. Illiterate or uneducated people can't rule a country or state.

Greetings Guys.

I really think that a country like India that possess a lot of diversity in every aspect should go in hands of patriotic and straightforward dictator for a particular period. The current situation is where everyone is having a lot of freedom in different terms and they are misusing it in exploiting other social and religious issues. People with their vibrant thoughts are actually taking the priorities of misguiding others and taking them on an irregular path of rebellion and at last controversies. The main problem that needs serious attention is not the economy or power but is religious diversity and those people who are promoting it for their penny sake. Democracy is a really good option when the freedom is concerned but in the present scene, our country seriously needs an objective single men to rule who should think above religion and can sort the basic issues that are going on in the area after which the secondary issues like economy and trade can be corrected.

Well, I see that democracy is the better alternative against dictatorship, as because.

1. A dictator, will have his own view of country's overall development, which might not suit everyone's need. Worst case scenario would be that he shall plan only for his benefits, or to implement his agenda. Beside, we shall never know whether the dictator thus installed in his/her post would actually work for the development of this great country?and he will not be accountable to anyone.

2. Even if democracy gets corrupted, it needs the support of the people in order to survive. So, even if one makes false promises in order to woo voters, he/she still must have to do something in order to get re-elected. In other way, democracy ensures the development, in spite of how fast or slow it is.

So if you any problem, choose a right representative who is honest, empathetic and can make and implement strategies to improve our lives.

If you don't find anyone, BECOME ONE.

What good is a democracy which can't protect its own civilians and soldiers from terror attacks? India is the largest democracy on the planet but it lacks diplomatic power. China continues to shield Pak terror organisations and India can't do anything about it. Democracy only works in a country where people are civilized. India is home to over 300 million Muslims and a lot of these roaches supported and celebrated these terror attacks. To sum it up India shares a border with Pakistan which exports terror, China which engages in land grabs and shields the terror actions of Pakistan and Bangladesh which send millions of illegal immigrants to India. Democracy isn't an option. If we take a close look at South Asia we can see all countries have rejected the ideology of Islam. China sent 10 million of them into concentration camps, Japan has rejected 99 per cent of the Syrian refugees along with South Korea. Vietnam, Laos. Myanmar kicked out the Rohingyas.

Dictatorship is what India needs right now.

The present form of Government has devastated the entire nation both socially and economically. After losing the majority of the resources, its pointless to believe that substantial amendments can be made to bring the nation back to track in possible time.

Dictatorship on the other hand, if laid down, has its own benefits and cons as well. No form of governance can be explained as to be the best for current India as challenges are getting piled up one upon another.

While democracy has been around the corner for a few decades now, laying down the foundation for a new form of governance should be approached rationally fulfilling the need of the hour.

People can derive many examples of nations under stable dictatorship and also believed to be as a significant factor in their development.

Remember guys.

"Too many cooks ruin the food" whereas "All it takes is only one man to bring the necessary change".

India is a democratic country, only in theories! The politicians and our so called law makers, instead of following the words of the public, do shit only which gives them some good amount of the so called; black money. They eat the people's money, promising to do everything, before the elections, and after that, we see them in media. Its kinda becoming their own motion and not the people's, and certainly on a different page, than that of democracy.

I positively think; India needs a dictatorship rule, atleast to re-enforce and tighten some laws and rules, which can never be attained by simply thinking to tighten them in old ways.

These days, those people have power, who have some basic image in the public and have a well full of money! They under estimate the common man, and hence the word of the common man are silenced.

To bring about a reform, something more of a revolution, can only be achieved by something related to dictatorship only.

It is the people of the country, who make the country developed. We are not living in that ancient period where we are dependent only on leaders for showing us the way. We are educated and aware enough to express our views on a platform. So if we want a change in our political system we have to enter into it.

Therefore saying that dictatorship will end our problems is not right. Dictatorship has never been good as we can see from past experience. It can be good only for a particular section of a society not for a nation as a whole. And especially for India which is so diverse and a single person cannot understand the diversified problems of people.

Many of my friends gave an example of Adolf Hitler but does we really want to be ruled by such leader who as racist views against other communities. I think we should not say blindly that dictatorship is good.

In my opinion, this dictatorship is not the feasible option for India.