What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Group Discussion

Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:

  • Assume, you one of the member of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution.
  • Post your answer now.

Ishaan Kaur said: (May 5, 2022)  
I don't get it. Why would you want a dictatorship?

Remember how Indira Gandhi was? She was responsible for shutting down people's civil liberties, imprisoning journalists, and other heinous activities. We the people can still choose an efficient leader. A dictatorship would crackdown on our freedom.

Rate this: +3 -4

Nitish Kumar said: (Dec 16, 2020)  
India is a democratic country. Democracy means of the people, for the people, by the people. India has always followed a culture of discipline. India carries the principle of diversity. India can not dictatorship country because of many religions, caste system different language. India and china same time freedom but china twenty times progress than India because China is dictatorship country and strict rules or regulations and education system is the best and same religion but India is democracy country and education system not good, many leaders are corrupt.

Rate this: +30 -20

Sparsh Agarwal said: (Dec 15, 2020)  
Greetings Guys.

I really think that a country like India that possess a lot of diversity in every aspect should go in hands of patriotic and straightforward dictator for a particular period. The current situation is where everyone is having a lot of freedom in different terms and they are misusing it in exploiting other social and religious issues. People with their vibrant thoughts are actually taking the priorities of misguiding others and taking them on an irregular path of rebellion and at last controversies. The main problem that needs serious attention is not the economy or power but is religious diversity and those people who are promoting it for their penny sake. Democracy is a really good option when the freedom is concerned but in the present scene, our country seriously needs an objective single men to rule who should think above religion and can sort the basic issues that are going on in the area after which the secondary issues like economy and trade can be corrected.

Rate this: +21 -6

Mankesh Shah said: (Aug 4, 2020)  
Hello, This is Mankesh Shah.

In my opinion Country like India doesn't need dictatorship because this country has many religions, caste people speaking different languages so if one becomes Dictator he may only look after focused side or may behave partially in taking decisions towards common people.

Rather than having Dictatorship India needs a good leader/Party to take the whole country towards overall development.

A good leader is enough for any country to take common people towards life's success path.

India needs strong rules and regulations and they must be followed by every single citizen of the country.

Rate this: +37 -15

Kaushik Ghosh said: (Jul 6, 2020)  
I think India needs a benevolent and patriotic dictator for a 15 year period. One who can stop the propaganda run by each media outlets in India which gives rise to communal tension in our society. I believe the press shouldn't be allowed to run their propaganda in defaming a particular religion or culture. Development, economy and foreign relation should be the issues emphasised in our country. India needs a dictator who can keep the people of our country united. Nationalism should be enforced and one should always view themselves as an Indian before anything.

Only when we the people of India are united and proud of our country, we can take India to New heights and I believe this is not possible in a democracy run by corrupt politicians and a worthless opposition.

Rate this: +25 -11

Aman said: (May 14, 2020)  
India needs dictatorship because one person's control can solve many problems like overpopulation, terrorism, and then there I'll be one focus on developing this great nation. Democracy can survive where people are civilized and believe in law and order here people wear a helmet because they don't want to pay for penalty rather than it is a safety for themself. It's been 70 years to our independence still we are stuck in the old system of work like a tortoise. When there is a terrorist attack on India some section of society celebrates as their success and no action taken by government There will be clarity in decision making and overall implementation of policies. A dictatorship can solve many of India's long going issues.

Rate this: +29 -10

Yaswanthm said: (Sep 14, 2019)  
No, India only needs a powerful leader. Besides democracy, our constitution provides basic powers to amend strict rules to make a change. An only powerful leader can do this.

Rate this: +25 -15

Shikhar Pratap Singh said: (Aug 1, 2019)  
Hi, this is Shikhar.

India has always been a country, which follows the culture of self-discipline in ruling other nations. It carries the principle of diversity. All were given the rights. But in the present scenario, we as a whole seemingly have failed to attain this motive. The people are making propaganda of even smaller things. The healthy social media objective is a long-gone thing. Frivolous issues are trending and are becoming a big hit.

In this kind of a situation when the country is heading towards a complete disorder (anarchy) and people are making a mockery of almost every agenda, the idea of dictatorship comes as a sudden flash to mind of a few conscientious people. Besides, this rule will help people learn self discipline and understand the values of what India was.

Rate this: +24 -4

Samyuktha said: (Jun 29, 2019)  
Hi friends this is Samyuktha.

So, in my point of view that the dictatorship is not good all the time. Dictatorship means to rule the people at the basis on one condition. So people need democracy They make the people run under the control of rules.

Some of the rulers take the money from the poor people. In olden it has happened.

The advantages of dictatorship are to make the people in a bond of some rules and regulations. For example, wearing of helmet it is safe for the people but some of the people did not care that words and spoiling their lives. So the policeman makes fine on the people who are not having the helmet and pay charges for it.

So I conclude that the dictator who is having the right qualities for the sake of people should be the right person for India. But people should also need democracy for sometimes.

Rate this: +21 -8

Modi said: (Apr 11, 2019)  
India needs a dictator but who will dictate whom, but unfortunately every state with every regional head will be in the line to dictate, the west, will say we have the best ruler, the east will say it is with us, the south will open its wealthy rulers, and the north will come out with its wealthy sarpanch, so will be chosen the fight for power will be waged by our own politician billionaires and we will always stand to lose as they will be more thirsty for power, than India will go to South, and east and Bharat to North, Hindustan to west.

Rate this: +11 -16

Ritwick said: (Apr 2, 2019)  
What good is a democracy which can't protect its own civilians and soldiers from terror attacks? India is the largest democracy on the planet but it lacks diplomatic power. China continues to shield Pak terror organisations and India can't do anything about it. Democracy only works in a country where people are civilized. India is home to over 300 million Muslims and a lot of these roaches supported and celebrated these terror attacks. To sum it up India shares a border with Pakistan which exports terror, China which engages in land grabs and shields the terror actions of Pakistan and Bangladesh which send millions of illegal immigrants to India. Democracy isn't an option. If we take a close look at South Asia we can see all countries have rejected the ideology of Islam. China sent 10 million of them into concentration camps, Japan has rejected 99 per cent of the Syrian refugees along with South Korea. Vietnam, Laos. Myanmar kicked out the Rohingyas.

Rate this: +22 -19

Vijendra Ray said: (Mar 25, 2019)  
We can't solve a problem by creating another problem.

There is a problem in the current political system but it could be solved by taking some corrective measures.

Dictatorship itself is a problem and assuming that it would solve problems is purely based on assumptions.

Rate this: +19 -12

Vicky Crazer said: (Feb 11, 2019)  
India needs dictatorship because current political is useless nothing to do making more fraud issues current political leaders are illiterate so hereafter coming ahead election youngsters should take leadership on political leaders.

Rate this: +24 -7

Nipun Chadha said: (Jan 6, 2019)  
India needs DICTATOCRACY. There is a huge time of facing democracy but still India has poverty, corruption, illiteracy and what not. There are around more than 2 crore people in India joined with politics.

Suppose each one of them have 1 crore then total is 2 * 10' this much money can rebuilt India again. Let the golden bird fly again.

Rate this: +19 -10

Akshat said: (Nov 15, 2018)  
No, India does not need a dictatorship just a little change in the political system for appointing the head of government and should give a little more power to the prime minister. Diversity is the power of India don't make it our weakness.

Rate this: +20 -30

Prateek said: (Nov 5, 2018)  
Democracy works when citizens of the country are being human and have integrity. It doesn't work for inhuman, antisocial people. In today's condition, very fewer people are being human. So, India needs a benevolent dictatorship for some years to restore humanity and integrity in its citizens. Then democracy can follow the Peace!

Rate this: +44 -9

Akash Pandit said: (Sep 14, 2018)  
Absolutely, It is been 71 years parties come and go but what they do scam scam scam rich is getting richer and poor is becoming poorer plus disbalance in natural resource a major population has no idea what the hell is going on plus middle class make everything except they live like they don't belong to nation they do protest sometimes what happens nothing good to country plus religion is also disbalanced do you guys know there is not a single Hindi country in whole damn world there are Islamic, Christian, Buddhism and also Jew nation which is only 60lakh people and 100 crores Hindi don't have their motherland fuck secularism India should become Israel the best country in dictatorship nowadays Islamic people don't sing national anthem what the hell they keep their religion above country it should be terminated under dictatorship plus everybody should join and taught the love to motherland in force like Israel plus there should be disabandoning of people who come to West Bengal from Bangladesh they account to 2 to 5 crores India should be made available as a gem to our future family sons daughter etc they should live here peacefully with every resource basic which provide real happiness. Plus this things from the practice of constitutional right are never gonna happen so we need dictatorship. Everybody hate Hitler for what he did as Holocaust yeah that's fucking absurd but he also develops Germany at a pace never seen before so we need dictatorship who also love humanity with doing the right development for country and world.

Rate this: +25 -21

Suk14 said: (Sep 9, 2018)  
First, I want to clear that I love the amazing place people call India. I don't have any grudge against it, the only reason I ever thought about this, is because of the political system which has plague the nation. Looking only from growth prespective at the time of our Independence both India and China had similar gdp. Aussuming that the condition we're same for growth, China is approx 10-20 times ahead of us. Taking in consideration that India has been involved in multiple wars with other nation and within our own nation. It should have grown to 4-5 times when compared to China. But the reality is entirely different the government hasn't even able to fully modernize the nation and reachability through road has also been a big question mark. I am baffled when I see old people who were so committed to change the nation and people now who just want to make money no matter how many lives they ruin.

I know I am small and I may not know the other side of the coin or even both the sides. But I am open to suggestions and only to constructive feedback.

PS: I know that Chinese dictatorship is not that good as most of the bad news gets suppressed due the control and censorship and most of the people who resist it get wacked.

Rate this: +16 -5

Pushkar Kapoor said: (Aug 21, 2018)  
Hello everyone.

I too believe that India needs a dictatorship, a patriotic dictatorship because without dictatorship the situation becomes miserable because our current system is not good enough to make India a developed nation, a super power which we were in past. Also, we need to amend 70% of our constitution.

Rate this: +27 -9

Aman Shankar said: (Aug 20, 2018)  
I don't believe dictatorship is the solution and I also don't believe that India has seen zero development since independence if anything the mindset of the people have changed, the people during independence were fed up with the British all of them wanted freedom and were ready to fight to death for it because their actions would impact the future generations which led to relatively rapid development in the beginning when people still had that spirit and dedicated their life to improvement of the country. But after a few generations this spirit kinda died off no one wants to go through all this trouble just so they can make a better country for their children. In fact a lot people want their children to get out of India and get a good job somewhere else in a developed country. Everyone likes to complain about the state of India but no one wants fix it themselves. There are not many people left like the first prime ministers of India. The people now just want to improve their own life and the easy way is to either move to more developed area or country. No one wants to struggle for the countries improvement just few complains about the situation. India needs citizens who are united and hustle for the betterment of the country. After all the people of a country is what makes it developed or poor if India is in a third world country it's simply because of the people. Democracy is the government of people, if the people don't want to govern well maybe they deserve to live a shit life.

Rate this: +16 -12

Pranava Rastogi said: (Jun 3, 2018)  
According to me, Within the Next 10 Years India will be under Dictatorship and the next 10 years It will become BHARAT (Notice the difference between India Hindustan and Bharat) They all are same nation physically but Totally different Politically and Culturally. India will be under Dictatorship and that's for sure because For the Full and complete development of the nation not only will the Government be responsible but more importantly the citizens of the nation because as we cannot clap with one hand, development cannot take place with just one authority. We need to go back to our culture i.e. from India to Bharat. And some really tough decisions are to be made in order to get this done and Dictatorship is the only way out.

Rate this: +46 -21

S. Kumar said: (Apr 7, 2018)  
Hello Everyone,

I strongly feel that India needs a patriotic dictatorship. As some of you are saying that there risk of the wrong person getting the power. My dear people, we are still taking that risk in democracy & we are getting failed every time.

I just want to ask "is this democracy doing any good to you?, can your children go out in the night? Etc. I have lots of questions regarding that but I don't want to take so much of time.

Actually, we are the hurdles in full development, because we take everything for granted, Just one example, Like breaking the traffic rules. We know that it can be very much damageable for us or anybody else but we just do it. We are becoming very stubborn in not following the law & we are not going to follow the law unless of until we are afraid for our own life. For that, I think we need a dictatorship.

There is the old saying "If You want something good, you will have to lose something" & I totally believe in this.

If we want a good future than we will have to take this risk. I know it will create lots of chaos, but it will surely change for good.

Rate this: +175 -12

Raja said: (Mar 28, 2018)  
Currently, India is reeling under corruption and overpopulation. So long as the population grows at an alarming rate, the progress of the country will be at snail's pace and will be dependent on other developed countries and still will remain a developing country. I have seen progress and drastic changes in Iraq when Saddam was ruling. In dictatorship one man lists for power but in a democratic country all leaders behave like wild dogs and try to eat from one plate in the process spilling everything and used to none. Everone will try to loot as much as-as possible.

Rate this: +24 -11

Vikranth_Bharatham said: (Mar 16, 2018)  
With the current situation of our politicians and nature of politics, It is notorious to have a Dictatorship. And for sure it will push the country into a civil war situation. When the people of the nation is not cooperating or, dealing with some rebel groups, dictation is required.

Here the real culprits are the upper crest society, corporates, diplomats, politicians, and mafias. Common people are always ready to comply and even ready to adapt to new changes based on the benefits.

So if you push dictation, the full force will not touch any of the real culprits. Due to their political influence and wealth, they will receive first class treatment even in a dictatorship. Only the middle class and common people will face the crushing effects of pure dictation. And ultimately they will get even frustrated and finally end up starting a revolt.

And also our politicians are extremely selfish and crooked. So giving full control in their hands is an absolute suicide.

Even now also is not the majority people expect a dictatorship, it's a small group of people with fanatical ideas demanding a dictation.

But whatever the case, dictation will wound the country so badly. And it would never be cured under any circumstances.

Rate this: +21 -10

Pradheep said: (Feb 26, 2018)  
Hello everybody,

Democracy is more reliable over Dictatorship, if Dictatorship falls into wrong hands, then we will have our hands tied and will be unable to react to the situation.

I would strongly contradict to what 'We Wake' (6th comment below me) said, imagine what would happen if Dictatorship falls in such hands? It should not be an eradication of a particular community or creed, rather it should be concerned with peacemaking between various communities and creed.

Rate this: +18 -18

Joji said: (Feb 23, 2018)  
No, dictatorship doesn't solve anything it enslaves people and leaves the country poor and millions of people will be murdered and all of the citizens will lose their rights still want a dictatorship yes or no?

Rate this: +7 -28

#Killevil said: (Feb 21, 2018)  
Democracy applies only for wise people and not for foolish and evil people. Evil people take advantage of democracy for their own concerns by exploiting foolish people. India comprises of these three kinds of people where democracy has become a mess. A Wise Dictator can change India by having strict rules by the fear of which foolish people will follow the right path and evil people will be jailed. By the strict law and order, minority of evil people will be prosecuted for the good of majority citizens and India can become a peaceful happy nation.

Rate this: +28 -4

Tuhara said: (Jan 2, 2018)  
No, the country needs dictatorship. India is already doing well. Also, corruption is not a big problem.

Illiteracy is. If we can just provide an opportunity for education to each and every citizen it is enough. I m not talking about quality education just a not too low-level education. This is enough. We don't have our views and we all are not able to go into politics and correct it. You or I are of this much capable most of the people are not. If we can just do this.

More than 1 billion educated Indians can change the entire planet.

Rate this: +13 -34

Anom said: (Jan 1, 2018)  
Yes, India needs dictatorship because main problem of this country is population, we should talk about population reduction. We should take extreme measures to control population like only child or stopping child birth for next 5 years. I think if sanjay Gandhi would have been alive this country would be different place all together. Bad luck for India he died so soon.

Rate this: +27 -26

Darshan said: (Dec 26, 2017)  
Yes! India definitely needs dictatorship because a country's development need suggestions but not advices of each individual. There will always be pros and cons of each decision taken. For instance why do we have elections at each level? to elect at area level then at state level then at country level. Electing one politician has become a tug of war right inside the country which literally weakens the strength of our country, instead if we have one dictator or rather a leader to rule but with that too, many citizens wouldn't agree so an alternative to that might be in such a way that a citizen do not lose his/her list of freedom but still they are bound to laws of country which might be decided by the dictator. Talking about the dictator might be elected directly instead of electing between two political parties. If the dictator works with a wrong motif for a country then it is possible, that individual can be dethroned and can be considered the least respected citizen. So the idea is to keep India under part Dictatorship.

Rate this: +33 -9

We Wake said: (Dec 24, 2017)  
In 70 years democracy gives us nothing. All muslims should be killed or forced them to leave the country. India only belongs to Hindus. Muslim's are bastardy.

Rate this: +25 -106

Nikhil Doohaan said: (Dec 22, 2017)  
Let me tell you what a dictatorship feels like a one-man show controlling all the diverse people of India.

Now let's assume that guy has some sort of hatred for a particular race/ section of India, he would issue orders to get that entire race socially oppressed.

One man just can rule a culturally diverse country like India.

Rate this: +21 -7

Ravali said: (Sep 29, 2017)  
Yes, of course, India needs dictatorship. It's because till we Indians are under the British rule we had things that were far better from now. Now, we see things that are losing its true nature. Corruption is having its hand on the higher level. The democracy is having nothing to do because it's busy on its way making money out of everything. And if the governance is that of a dictatorship India will work wonders. Because then at least with the fear at least people may change their attitude towards society and at least then a kind of communalism can then occur. Shakespeare has once quoted spare the rod spoil the child. This means till the governance is not strict at its part, change can NVR be expected. So India is in need of strict discipline for It DICTATORSHIP is the best governance.

Rate this: +59 -6

Kumar said: (Aug 4, 2017)  
Yes, I do think India needs a dictatorship. India being a diverse nation faces many problems in which corruption has a major role when there is dictatorship this can be eradicated. Besides, India has a reservation even by today in all fields for which talented people are losing their opportunities and it can only be abolished by a dictatorship.

Rate this: +54 -7

Anonymous said: (Jul 6, 2017)  
I think India needs dictatorship. India cannot develop until her people are held by a fixed pole and for that we need a dictator.

Many of you may think that a dictator in India can become a reality because of India's diversity. But Indians do share a common past. That spirit can only hold Indians together. That happened during colonial period and so it can happen now too. So before we talk about any other qualities of an Indian dictator we must make sure that he is a true nationalist.

Now some of you may also think that even if India gets a good dictator what will happen after he dies. The answer is also given in our history books. One generation of nationalists created the next. In this way the struggle against the British continued. So the same principle can be applied for a dictator too as he should be perhaps the greatest of all revolutionaries.

India can never become a superpower until the ideology of 'one people one nation one leader' is popularised and is practised among the people of this country.

Rate this: +48 -6

Anonymous said: (Jun 29, 2017)  
India wouldn't accomplish anything even after dictatorship has come into the power. What we really need is to make people think rationally. How much money do you think is spent on eligious thing that we do? A lot probably. And I'm not saying people shouldn't follow their culture, they just should know when they are over doing it.

Rate this: +11 -22

Poorva said: (May 24, 2017)  
I think India needs dictatorship as for last 68 years we have democracy and we can see the rate of our development had there been a good dictator in India it would have shown spectacular growth till today votes are been purchased by corrupt leaders the illiterate are been exploited badly as they do not have a say in choosing leaders on the basis that he or she will further take India to great heights but for certain amount of money because of poverty in India moreover I think so as if India needs a dictator who can indeed make India a developed nation from a developing one all I want to say that India don't need a dictator like a fanatic leader it needs a good leader who should be secular more importantly a quite genius to look after diversities related issues then I am quite sure we would be far better in China it achieved great heights in 60 years as America has done in past 200 years in India judiciary here is quite slow let us look forward to a country like India being governed by someone say good leader or more accurately a dictator.

Rate this: +50 -8

Anonymous said: (May 4, 2017)  
Dictatorship along with patriotism is required in INDIA to make it a superpower.

Rate this: +45 -10

Sairaj said: (Mar 18, 2017)  
I think dictatorship is needed as the money used for elections can be used for welfare of India.

Rate this: +28 -9

Sdpmmna said: (Mar 4, 2017)  
Democracy is a form of dictatorship where the people get to decide who the dictator should be.

Rate this: +16 -29

Roshan said: (Jan 27, 2017)  
Dictatorship; Word dictator-speak for itself.

Dictatorship is not that evil when the leader is pro-nationalist.

I think we need dictatorship.

We have seen many stuff in the name of freedom of speech.

Disrespectful toward motherland.

Kashmir issue.

Sudden growth in communalism during election.

What we need is pro-nationalist political party rather than dictator.

We need someone who directly slaps someone who starts communal politics for his own gain.

One who have power to fight against injustice and anti-national stuff its don't matter whether its took face of extreme hooliganism. (Nation first-religion afterwards).

Rate this: +40 -9

Krishna said: (Jan 21, 2017)  
Hello friends.

Does India needs the dictatorship? I say it need not have any changes in way of ruling. The country needs is the change of mindset of people Why I was saying this. Democracy means rule by the people. We are indirectly involved thats it. We are responsible for the loss of moral values in the society at times. Let us go with few examples.

1. Suppose if we want to go to a movie and if there are no tickets we try to get them in black market. Or get a piracy CD to watch the film. We are indirectly encouraging the Piracy market and the black market.

2. No one wants to wait. Everyone wants to get their work get completed as soon as possible. So they try approaching by giving bribes.

3. Then coming to the illiterate. They take the money and vote for a specific party. Few people with caste and religion feeling they elect a wrong person.

Keep all those aside. If we try keeping ourselves and our surroundings. Clean we need not spend lots of money to clean that waste and implement plans like swatch Bharat and collect swach cess for it. Its like we feel why should I care if its not affecting me. But the thing we are the one who are suffering again. Therefore its highly enough if every one of us develops wisdom before doing any action. Sorry Friends if I have hurt anyone's feelings.

Thank you.

Rate this: +64 -7

Deep Patel said: (Dec 14, 2016)  
Yes. India needs a dictatorship but history has many examples to prove this wrong. Giving the thought of the present day India and the mindset with which we live.

1. Walking along the road you find TRASH everywhere, cattle roaming everywhere in the place where I live. They must be placed where they are supposed to in the bin and the cattle in their area. The mindset of the people has to be changed for this if we want to want to make a Swacch Bharat. (the attitude of "CHALEGA" has to be removed).

2. The POPULATION of India is also the major factor affecting the growth rate at which we are developing. A stringent population policy must be introduced.

3. Also, the KASHMIR issue along with TERRORISM has to be dealt with seriously which can end a major part of our budget being spent on the defense also the claiming of lives of many soldiers.

4. CORRUPTION has to be dealt with seriously if we want a developed India.

5. The people have to think about the caste, creed, race, sex, color and the morale of India as a whole with each person contributing to the growth of the country.

6. We being the largest democracy in the world spend a lot in the elections and other related activities to the elections which can be used for any other development work.

7. The gap between the rich and the poor.

8. Equal laws for all. Respect for WOMEN.

9. MOST importantly the issue of RESERVATION, we need to get over this as soon as we can and make an ECONOMIC criteria for reservation. (which Modi will play once the whole system is converted to white economy after this demonetization move).

10. The traffic in our country is very unorganized and needs a revolution to curb the pollution.

All the above issues can be dealt with by moving from democracy to a new system (need not necessarily a dictatorship) but a system in which we all treat each other as equal and change our mindset of "CHALEGA". Also, stringent laws with respect to molestation, rape, traffic, population control must be in place.

Till then let's do best with this system in place and make the best out of this for INDIA being good responsible citizens.

Rate this: +52 -9

Drake said: (Nov 27, 2016)  
Well, I say my point in one sentence (INDIA REQUIRES DICTATOR) in India there are many political parties and most of their leaders are corrupt or doing corruption. We Indians seriously don't know how to use democracy. As water destroys a phone, politics destroys the relationship of the countries. Let me take an example India and Pakistan fight in war and politics but politics effect cricket a sport. Politics is destroying the spirit of the country. There should be only one permanent leader in India that will make India great. I don't support the democracy I support constitutional monarchy. India will follow the same constitution but not democratic but dictator.

Rate this: +21 -13

Harshit Shukla said: (Oct 20, 2016)  
What is dictatorship?

This is the question we should discuss first rather than jumping on a higher level question such as What India need is a Dictatorship.

History is the proof that there may be development at starting in the countries where there was dictatorship but end was not that much appreciable.

In place of having a dictator, our country needs leaders having leadership qualities along with moral values that could inspire other young minds to come in politics and give their contribution in taking their countries from developing the list to developed.

Thus, at last, I would love to mention one thing that besides changing the way of governance we need to work at the moral level of every citizen, instilling the love for the nation. Before taking any action think how this action is going to help your country.


Rate this: +23 -4

Chetu said: (Oct 6, 2016)  
Yes, I also think that dictatorship is essential in nations like India. Because if there will be a number of political parties, unnecessary competition for money and power will be increasing. We should not forget words of Adolf Hitler "one leader, one voice, one nation, and flag". Such nation can only work for social welfare and security of one's nation. So, I strongly support DICTATORSHIP. There are many thinkers in India who can suggest us some good and pleasant formats for the dictatorial system. Thanks! Sorry if I used offensive opinion against anyone's idea.

Rate this: +29 -6

Partha Jois said: (Sep 19, 2016)  
This a subject way out of today's Agenda. That does not mean that it has lost its importance. YES, India needs dictatorship. Leaving democracy may appear a dangerous step towards the development, but hey we know what the speed of development of this nation is. We all know India is a spectacular place, but it could be even better, with all good people. For this we need a strong autocracy, this may appear menacing, this leads to people raging against the person who has the opinion of dictatorship, but if it is given a deep thought, it appears that dictating works in India far better than what democracy does.

Contestants in elections use money and liquor as a means to tempt people to vote for them. This happens where I live. And people are attracted to them, this is not right. This happens not in front of a responsible citizen's eye, but behind him. In order to remove this, we should teach lessons not only for those contestants but also those who accepted the money or anything it might be. Punishments do not work because people who reinforce those punishments are also indulging themselves in these nasty practices For this people must be empowered. These complicated things can never be ruled out until and unless the whole system is ruled out. And yes that is the only solution for this country.

Dictatorship also has some boundaries, what the country needs is not Hitler-Dictatorship but A good dictatorship. If this does not happen, this leads to the even bad government. But, we can conclude that a Dictatorship can be the best to India, but it can also be a danger.

Rate this: +23 -9

Harnaam Singh said: (Aug 9, 2016)  
The debate whether India needs dictatorship can go on for a long time so far as until India becomes fully developed nation which again means a very very long time or almost near to impossible considering the present rate of improvement, but one thing is for sure after all these years through, the great souls of legendary revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, Sukhdev and Rajguru might be wondering today "was it really worth it".

Divide and Rule policy by British government or,

Caste based vote bank politics by Indian politicians.

Loot of India wealth by British govt in their whole time period. or,

Loot of Indian wealth by Indian politicians in the last 70 years.

Was it really worth a freedom for all those sacrifices.

Rate this: +18 -15

Amol Sakpal said: (Aug 4, 2016)  
INDIA DON'T NEED DICTATOR but there should be rules and laws and QUICK Actions like other countries for respective crimes, and punishment should be same As 1for all, every individual should have control in him whatever it may be, if he doesn't like thief should be punished by cutting his hands, raper should be punished by cutting his reproductive organ if strict government laws will be followed NO one will dare or even think of doing any crime, knowledge is everything but knowledge should able to discriminate between good and bad that knowledge makes sense.

Rate this: +16 -15

Hoppus said: (Jul 12, 2016)  
Yes, we need a dictator in country like India, peoples are uncivilised, people do as they wish in their own way and officers or politician are under the control of many don gundas, and businessman. We need strict rule over the people of India to reduce crime over women.

Rate this: +19 -8

Rennett said: (Jun 22, 2016)  
India does not need a dictator, but a leader with strict discipline, a person who shows no partiality to anyone (rich or poor). He should grant justice. He should abolish prostitution and ban porn which would reduce rape attacks. He must bring back the black money stored in a Swiss bank and use it for the development of India. Punishments must be made severe so that people should be afraid to commit the crime. He must avoid foreign companies to invade India because they will rule us once again. If foreign companies start increasing, it will destroy many India companies. Then there will no Indian company, all companies will be foreign. Thus we will end up obeying their rules and they controlling us.

Rate this: +28 -17

Epshita said: (Jun 3, 2016)  
It is the people of the country, who make the country developed. We are not living in that ancient period where we are dependent only on leaders for showing us the way. We are educated and aware enough to express our views on a platform. So if we want a change in our political system we have to enter into it.

Therefore saying that dictatorship will end our problems is not right. Dictatorship has never been good as we can see from past experience. It can be good only for a particular section of a society not for a nation as a whole. And especially for India which is so diverse and a single person cannot understand the diversified problems of people.

Many of my friends gave an example of Adolf Hitler but does we really want to be ruled by such leader who as racist views against other communities. I think we should not say blindly that dictatorship is good.

In my opinion, this dictatorship is not the feasible option for India.

Rate this: +34 -13

Hrishap said: (May 25, 2016)  
India needs 'dictatorship' right now we have been in democracy for about 68 years and that clearly didn't work. Now if we are choosing dictator then the same story will happen. The dictator should have best qualities of hitler. Dictator should capable of getting the powers himself and he should only become dictator whose only intention is to develop India.

Rate this: +20 -11

Deepak said: (May 13, 2016)  
It's not dictatorship which is need of the hour, it is the improvement of current functioning and having our eyes and ears open to the changes around us and pockets closed for the corrupt ones. We are empowered with online grievance portal by the government, a strong media, and few good politicians.

On the other hand dictatorship can not be termed as a solution because we don't know whether it will improve the situation or worsen it, it is only better to improve what we are having in our hands.

Rate this: +6 -16

Xyz said: (Apr 2, 2016)  
In my opinion, Even though India is democratic, no one gets an equal opportunity to express their ideas and views regards rules and regulations in the system. People who were rich and had fame can able to give the decisions and ideas. So, how far is it really working? For example, in elections we know that particular candidate encourages corruption still we can't avoid that person because of his name and fame. We can't avoid corruption in our system. If the entire system failed to implement such things if a dictator performs correctly and makes in developing and implementing successfully. Then that particular dictator is good rather than the entire system.

So I would like to say that if dictator performance and ruling is good then entire system. Then it's good to better encourage dictatorship rather than Government system.

Rate this: +17 -9

Nazism said: (Mar 18, 2016)  
India needs 'dictatorship' right now we have been in democracy for about 68 years and that clearly didn't work. There is an extreme need of dictatorship for us and we need to adopt Nazism, which is a clear guidance for dictatorship, so either speaking about dictatorship in India we should talk about "NAZISM in INDIA".

Rate this: +18 -23

Harsh Vardhan said: (Mar 18, 2016)  
In democracy, we are still in control of these selfish leaders. There should be more and more participation of people in decision making, this is what democracy says. But I have never seen any common people participating in decision making.

I would say, a good dictator and the type of dictator who thinks of the country's situation and really want to serve India, then that is 100. Better than this corrupt democracy.

In India, judiciary system is not good. It is very, very slow.

Rate this: +13 -8

Prince Ajathastru said: (Feb 26, 2016)  
I think dictatorship can bring wealth to the whole country at a faster rate and develope this country. The only problem in dictatorship is the dictator himself. If we choose a dictator then it will be the same story.

So the dictator should be capable of getting the powers himself, and only he shall become a dictator whose only intention is to develop India at cost any thing or living things.

Rate this: +19 -10

Karuna said: (Feb 3, 2016)  
No need of dictatorship at all, what we need wise leaders, India power is youth. So youth come forward for country, our dream is to be a engineer or doctor but not politician.

If we will change our mindset, instead of blame any system we should start thinking to get in particular one for change it.

If we want to change burning issues of India which is corruption, poverty, bribe, division. We need to take position of leaders not agree for dictatorship.

Rate this: +24 -17

Thasin said: (Jan 22, 2016)  
I don't think India needs a dictator specifically, because to rule a country with massive population, democracy is the best. But the rules and qualification of ruling parties can be changed for the better development.

It is not necessary that an educated person should only come to the politics but the persons who comes forward for politics should be educated for proper political knowledge and can participate in election only if they are qualified.

Rate this: +15 -18

Amandeep Singh said: (Jan 10, 2016)  
In my point of view India don't need dictatorship although we know that India is facing many problems like unemployment, poverty and religious fights but that doesn't mean that dictatorship can alone solve theses problems.

Dictatorship may worsen these problems because as the people's choose their leaders which do wrong jobs we may choose wrong dictator who can directly control all the country and can do anything for his benefits. What we need is democracy with clear agenda of choosing the right people who has proved his ability by doing some right jobs in his life and on which we can trust that leaders who we know will definitely work for the development and growth of the country.

Rate this: +30 -13

Akshai Pal said: (Jan 1, 2016)  
I think India need a dictator having good qualities of Hitler, Saddam Hussain etc. There are many points TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. Some of them are:

I. The higher or richer sections of the society exposed the common people in all ways before independence of India and now after independence of India the so called politicians are very well know for their corruption and how these politicians protest against bills, laws and amendments which are in favor of the common people as they don't won't the central or state government to work. And then blame the government for not working properly.

II. Even during crisis the political parties don't support each other.

III. Innocent people trapped by these politicians are suppressed and they are voices are never been heard. If poor people are not able to repay their debt of a certain amount of money including the interest the either take all their money and property but still if it is insufficient they take away their women and children and force them to do work or force them to commit crime.

IV. These politicians have so much of power that after been elected by the common people misuse their power. They are provided with so many facilities that they just want more and more.

V. A politician gets away from any scandal and scam by bribing or using other methods as the JUDICIARY OF INDIA IS WEAK, THE POLICE CORRUPT AND THE MEDIA WHO STRUGGLES FOR THEIR NEWS CHANNEL OR NEWSPAPERS GLORY.

VI. If there is a protest for increment of salaries of politicians then within days the act would be passed and there would be a war of words that be a major one within those days but if farmers and labors want an increase in their salary then either the politicians keep quiet or make funny remarks.

VII. When a man gets thrashed up abroad who is any Indian citizen then politicians blame the the government of that country but when a foreign women gets raped then they keep quiet.

VIII. Its not only politicians but the government officials that are lazy and get easily bribed and are always insufficient with there work.

IX. Politicians get so much of money and facilities that if you divide all the money and facilities given to all politicians the state of poverty in India would get much better.

X. "CORRUPTION SWEEPS THROUGH EVERY CORNER" This statement I find is very true because India has such a weak constitution that the laws are of no use as they are not implemented properly, also, too much of leniency that makes it easy for corrupt people to expand corruption in every field.

As you can see its is the fault of politicians mostly. There is no point of marching with candlesticks or doing a hunger strike. Like the French Revolution and The Russian Revolution India needs and Indian Revolution to show how strong and furious the common people are if anyone crosses there limit. Yes, there would be demerits but the merits need to be seen also.

The only thing is that the dictator is successful in maintaining the economy of the society, and maintain peace and harmony.

Rate this: +71 -8

Anshul Gupta said: (Oct 25, 2015)  
Dictatorship leads to create riots in a country as we go in a flashback we saw an example of Iraq under the dictatorship of Saddam Hussain, Egypt under Gaddaffi, Germany under Hitler currently Libiya wars, Syria Crisis all these situation created due to the impact of Dictatorship.

Rate this: +22 -26

Deepanshu said: (Oct 17, 2015)  
Well we should respect our elders thinking. Because everything happens for a reason. We will never find a RAM in kaliyuga who will always going to take decisions for his society.

Always blaming the system is not the solution. And what India really needs is people with brains so that they could choose a right system.

Rate this: +24 -13

Kunjal Chawhan said: (Sep 30, 2015)  
Dictatorship is on its own is very bad for any nation, if history has taught us anything about dictatorship then its the bad consequences that it faces because of it. What India needs is both dictatorship and democracy because in a democratic nation people lives happily. Dictatorship should be applies in areas like.

CLEANLINESS - People not following cleanliness should be penalized compulsorily. If this rule is followed then roads will be clean. Regular diseases will be decreased caused by Bactria and other agents caused by not following cleanliness.

PROHIBITION ON BRIBE - Whichever sector may it be public or private. Taking and giving of bribe should be compulsorily prohibited anyone not following this rule should be sent to prison for at least a month. Among both the parties giver/receiver.

PENALTY ON DELAY - May it be private sector or government sector in either case they should be penalized if work is not done in given time if thus rule is followed there would not come any chance of bribe, because people pay bribe to speed up the system and understanding people urgency they deliberately complete task late so that they can score bribe.

In such a way if dictatorship is used in such areas a lot of development could be brought in. Because people would only follow when they are penalized under dictatorship otherwise they would pay bribe and speed up the system.

Rate this: +75 -10

Animesh said: (Sep 16, 2015)  
India don't need dictatorship. Dictatorship are bad as they make decisions and implement them without thinking about the effect on people. In some cases, the internet and free speech are restricted too. No one can stop a dictator leader easily, he does what he feels. The make rules and regulations tight. For small crimes, they sentenced them long.

Rate this: +12 -16

Meenakshi said: (Sep 15, 2015)  
India need a mix of both democracy and dictatorship. India need an honest, patriot, responsible, educated, straight-forward and strict leader. The problem will not get solved with democracy or dictatorship, it will get solved by changing our mentality. We need to change our mindset. India boasts of highest population of youth in the world. Everyone dreams of becoming a doctor, engineer, accountant, managers, professors, teachers, lawyers. Does anyone want to become a politician? Why?

India have a lots of educational institutes for doctors and engineers. But do we have any single educational institute where the people who rule us are being taught? There is no qualification to be a politician. That is the reason why we are being ruled by foolish, uneducated people in the name of democracy. Problem is with common people, who first elect the foolish, uneducated people and criminals to rule our country, and then cry of corruption and scams.

The youth needs to come up and lead the country from the front. Its high time now, more honest people need to enter politics. We need to grow up from the petty politics in the name of caste, creed and religion. We should have a feeling "COUNTRY COMES FIRST".

Rate this: +99 -9

Shivaji said: (Sep 2, 2015)  
India has democracy for nearly 68 years.

We did have progressed a lot but democracy has made us lazy in context with are work. The powers are divided among too many people, the president is just for name sake. He is just like the Queen of England fake fame and pride. He can't even make decision for the armed forces of which he is the very head. This vast division of power has made our rulers sick leading to corruption, dishonesty, etc.

In such conditions dictatorship is very useful. Same as Germany in 1936. A country that didn't even had enough food to feed its people was ready to go on a massively destructive war till 1939. What I think is that like India has adopted the communist as well as democratic ways of governing it should also adopt some characteristics of dictatorship.

Rate this: +18 -12

Sameer said: (Aug 1, 2015)  
I think democracy is better than autocracy because in autocracy, only one person has absolute power. And what is the guaranty that he or she will use this power for usage of mankind? It is totally unpredictable. Also by looking at the face of Indian politician, no one is worthy to choose as dictator. They will use this money for himself.

Rate this: +45 -15

Krishnaveni.S said: (Jul 27, 2015)  
Hi friends,

We know that India is a democratic country.

Many people in this country have many problems and have many conflict, but we don't understand that these problems are due to people around us and people with us. Still we blame our government and complain about it.

Some of the things we should know are;

* Our government has one of the bulkiest constitution resulting many conflicts.

* The political leaders are not worried about their duties.

* Youths are not interested to be part of politics just like me and you who want to be doctor, engineer, scientist, businessman, fashion designer, artist and actor but not a politician.

If we would be able to overcome these problems then there would be no need of any other type of government because the way of our government{democratic} would be great.

Rate this: +48 -10

Ranbir said: (Jul 15, 2015)  
Democracy with a pinch of dictator values is what India wants right now. By this I basically emphasise on the slow developments in our society. We Indians are people who work best under fear. Let's take example of wearing helmets, we wear helmets not because it keeps us safe but we wear it because we fear the traffic policemen who would otherwise impose a challenge on us.

Developement in India is today limited to that helmet when we see the "Danda" we develop, when we don't we pause. So according to me the parties should be limited to two or three so that people can easily judge. The elected must have right to make bold decisions and should only be questionable only to the highest authority so as to instill a sense of fear to work and development would be the result.

Rate this: +58 -8

Chaitu said: (Jul 13, 2015)  
I strongly feel believe that India require a dictator like Adolf Hitler so that the life style of the people changes and we can be witnessing a completely developed India.

Rate this: +23 -25

Piyush Kumar said: (Jun 19, 2015)  
Hello friends,

If we look back in history, the very first name comes in our mind is of Adolf Hitler, a German solider whose patriotism was misconstrued with dictatorship. It was he who lead his people for the need of country in availing prosperity, liberty and a strong nation. And today we can easily find how Germany has big impact not only in European union but also in the world in the field of science & technology, economics & politics. It does not mean practicing dictatorship by country's leader always have the same output only if it involves the idea of "country first".

In present scenario, we are racing to consolidate our self in the globe in every domain. Our markets are rising, Department of Science and Technology are being recognized across the globe, we are inching towards in developing a better, salubrious and safe place for our people, but in Snail's place as we vision to achieve "a developed nation" title only in this decade. A dictatorship attitude may enforce others to make the all possible work done in time remain either in fear or loyalty.

If the whole idea is channelized effectively, definitely, it will not only gear up all our on going objectives but also help us to achieve it in stipulated time. It is need of hour. It can better understand by taking example of china whom we are lagging behind even getting independence three years early.

Rate this: +37 -8

Akash said: (Jun 6, 2015)  
Not exactly a dictatorship, but a democratic dictator is all we need. To explain the meaning a party who is elected by the people with a complete majority in the parliament and then the best dictatorial leader among that party, who can impose his/her laws an views on the citizens.

Rate this: +18 -10

Anniket said: (May 25, 2015)  
As there is no proven system for this country this country is running on just ideas and experiments all over these years, and don't be astonished to see no development no infrastructure in the coming years too.

The system of constitution is completely VOID in today's world. The simple thing we understand that when something is not working it has to be changed and if you can't make the difference.

Just simply outsource this nation to some other countries. This is the only solution cos to run a country we need a system that leading countries are equipped with. So unite and make this country a better place by placing the overall concept of constitution to outsourcing.

Rate this: +7 -16

Anusha said: (May 18, 2015)  
I do not feel that abandoning the idea of democracy is the best way to deal with its apparent failure as a system of governance for the nation. I understand the frustration with the current system which makes one look to an all powerful leader unbound by the opinions of others. However, it is a dangerous delusion to think that a dictator would only work for the good of the people. What makes democracy a long and arduous process is the very same one which makes it a reliable and accurate process of decision-making.

Democracy is by the people, of the people and for the people. It is the best guarantee of equality. Those disappointed by the track record of democracy only need to look at the track record of dictatorships. Hitler was a dictator. Stalin was a dictator. The dissatisfaction of the people in dictatorships ultimately boils over in the form of violent revolutions.

In theory, dictatorships sound like a more efficient way of governance. However, the idea doesn't hold water in practice due to the very human nature of any leader. The power and absolute subservience of the citizens in a dictatorship make it possible for the dictator to think he can get away with anything. Quite simply, there is no way to ensure accountability of a dictator. That is why democracy, despite all its faults is our best bet at a better nation.

Rate this: +30 -7

Anik Siwach said: (Apr 30, 2015)  
I think, everything that is wrong in India is due to the democracy. People have a say in everything, altering the right function of the country. Yes, I agree it is nice for the people to have the power of their own country but this means no strict law can be passed.

Essentially, if India wants to become a superpower, Indian needs to reduce the crime rate and make it known to the world. This can only be done by becoming a dictatorship. Dictatorship will definitely spark a fire among the people but in the long term; a criminal can be hanged, without any socialist people acting against the government.

Rate this: +23 -9

Anupam Kumar said: (Apr 18, 2015)  
According to my point of view, India is a democratic country. There is no need of dictatorship for people country but political party must need to dictator, because at present time the member of party feel independent. There is no restricting rule for the member of party.

So according to me the chief of party should have to be dictator for his own member because party is run on the basis of their chief the member is follow his chief that they instruct. But dictatorship should not be for development.

When you represent the own country in world level at that time dictatorship is acceptable because it shows the power of country and economy. Dictatorship will only be acceptable on the basis of development, secularism, nutrility, non violence.

Rate this: +6 -11

Shivam Choudhary said: (Apr 15, 2015)  
Dictatorship will make it worse. Dictatorship will only work if a dictator wants to do something for his country but unlimited power. I don't think so dictatorship is gonna work. Government need's to change its policies. We can solve our country's problem in two ways :-

1. Our parliament should amend the constitution and give power to supreme court so that every single bill or law which is passing in parliament must be approved by supreme court both are the different systems of democracy which will limit misuse of power by the members of parliament. If there a corruption case against a minister than it is must for investigation agencies to submit report to the supreme court within 1 year and supreme court must have to take its judgment under 1 month.

2. Second there should be a minimum qualification requirement for every member of a party to fight election or a competitive examination to be eligible for taking part in election. Illiterate or uneducated people can't rule a country or state.

Rate this: +22 -8

Pradeep Sharma said: (Apr 14, 2015)  
Dear friends,

In our democratic country, there should be no place for dictatorship. We should respect to those who sacrificed their precious lives to get rid of dictatorship of English people for all of us as we are enjoying today. You can remember that time before independence when our brave men like Mahatma Gandhi, Subhash Chandra Bose, Azad, Sukhdev, Bhagat Singh and a large number of freedom fighters fought for us to make our life better than before.

They did not accept dictatorship of English people rather than to run them away to their own country our every freedom fighter made dictator himself (for English people) by following his own principles and values so that Indian people could not face dictatorship of foreigners again. We have fundamental rights under which we use different kind of powers distinctively.

Rate this: +13 -8

Arjunsekher said: (Apr 9, 2015)  
India is a democratic country, only in theories! The politicians and our so called law makers, instead of following the words of the public, do shit only which gives them some good amount of the so called; black money. They eat the people's money, promising to do everything, before the elections, and after that, we see them in media. Its kinda becoming their own motion and not the people's, and certainly on a different page, than that of democracy.

I positively think; India needs a dictatorship rule, atleast to re-enforce and tighten some laws and rules, which can never be attained by simply thinking to tighten them in old ways.

These days, those people have power, who have some basic image in the public and have a well full of money! They under estimate the common man, and hence the word of the common man are silenced.

To bring about a reform, something more of a revolution, can only be achieved by something related to dictatorship only.

Rate this: +37 -3

Sanjay said: (Apr 5, 2015)  
Indians do not live the present times, they do not think future. Indians live only in the Past tense.

We are divided by languages, history and race. We nurture the separatism in our states, our cities, our lanes and in our hearts. We talk about kings, Nababs, Zagirdars and Zamindars.

Current democratic India is a ticking time bomb of population explosion, changed demography, hunger-water shortage, civil wars and chronic capitalism.

History is bunk! Burn all the history books. Boycott the elections- we do not want all these democratic farce & shams under which we suffered since independence! If we look into the future, it looks bleak. We need to face the future and change it today.

What India needs is Dictator to have will power of changing the things with hard decisions. But such idea looks utopian today in our country. Dictator like Singapore PM Li Kuan, dictator like Stalin, dictator like Fidel Castro.

But as long as we live in the past it cannot be done. We need to change and forget our past and look towards future. If people strongly desire it, a leadership will automatically emerge.

Loksabha elections 2014 have shown the people's strong will. But as long as it is democratic frame work nothing will work, because democracy and market driven economy is not going to deliver to last man standing.

If we need real state which can deliver then we should change, Believe in future and be ready for sacrifice.

Rate this: +15 -4

Janani said: (Mar 27, 2015)  
In my opinion dictatorship is efficient but dictatorship is the rule by a single person which means that there is only one point of view for passing the law, amendment to the existing law or any other official matters.

On, the contrary in a democracy each and every decision is made on the basis of through discussion by our representatives which helps to bring in many different point of views, and helps to make a better decision and judgement about a particular issue.

Rate this: +8 -6

Manish Ojha said: (Mar 23, 2015)  
India is a democratic country. Democracy means where there are more than one political party and the people of the country has right to elect their party. Dictatorship is where there is only man ruling the entire country. I would like to compare democracy and dictatorship with two economic terms competitive market and monopoly market respectively.

Competitive market is where there is more than one seller and monopoly is where there is only one seller in the market. The competition in the market among sellers help in reducing the price which benefits the consumers. Just like that in democratic country competition among these political parties definitely benefits the people of the country as the ruling party knows that if it does not serve the people they will not vote for it.

In monopoly as there is only one seller in the market it has total control over the price and it can increase the price according to its will which is not good for the consumers. Similarly if there is a dictatorship in the country the ruler or the ruling party knows that they can do whatever they feel like and nobody can challenge him as it used to happen during the ancient times where the king used to rule the entire kingdom. So I am against dictatorship.

Rate this: +11 -6

Saagar said: (Mar 19, 2015)  
We need Dictatorship but not in such a way that it should eradicate freedom of speech, religion etc. Because we should get of this corrupt politics in this country. Our opinion Dictatorship is surely needed.

Rate this: +10 -1

Abhi said: (Mar 18, 2015)  
I think India don't need dictatorship India is a republic country and best as it is. If we let India rule under the dictators it will be the disrespect or slap on the face of our great freedom fighter who laid their today for our tomorrow and I cannot disrespect them.

Rate this: +13 -6

Ankur Thummar said: (Mar 11, 2015)  
As a my opinion India has required appropriate leader not a dictator. For this, we have required to understand our responsibility of citizenship. Today, due to carelessness of the people election is not done very well. There are many people who are not do a voting.

First we need to improve ourselves, before to saying wrong about any leader or country. Thus India has not required dictator. If we get dictator, we can not say this he or she will do a good deed for a country. He may improve mar to country. Thus in India public understanding is required aspect.

Rate this: +7 -3

Aditya Karve said: (Mar 8, 2015)  
No friends, a dictator is the ideal form of government for India. In this vast country of diverse people, coming to a definite idea is an arduous task. Only a dictator can speed things up. Most of you will may take Adolf Hitler as an example to prove me wrong.

Well friends, Nazi Germany made tremendous progress in a short period of time had the antisemitism element been absent, it would've won the war and we see Adolf as a hero. Also the population in general was happy.

A majority of people would not join politics. So, might as well leave the government in the hands of one capable man who ensures the moral and material progress of the people. Only a dictator can root out social evils. Only a dictator can bring about a surge of intense nationalism.

A leader who as they say can walk with the kings yet not lose the common touch is the ideal leader.

Rate this: +17 -11

Bhupendra Rawat said: (Feb 26, 2015)  
Hello friends,

My name is Bhupendra Rawat. Dictatorship should not be in India because in dictatorship only one person will rule on the country, I would like to remember about ancient Indian there were lot of kings and Nawab. They used to make new law to live in his kingdom.

They used to do whatever they want, they never ask suggestion from any one. They used to try to defeat to each other and pile up. The result was that British did rule over the India. But in democracy do not allow so, in democracy, king is elected by people, people rule over the country, people makes law and follow. They have freedom to speak.

Thank you.

Rate this: +7 -8

Richard said: (Feb 22, 2015)  
Hello everyone.

I would agree with Ritika. But taking the fact of politics in India passing of a bill is done on the basis of vote banks but not for well being of all. We Indians must love all other Indians. The type of government doesn't really affect the country its the public which does. If we ask why is USA so much developed, its just because they love each and every citizen of theirs, but in India its all majority wins principle.

And we can take the example of reservation, Dr. Ambedkar gave the proposal of reservation only for a decade but as our politicians learnt that reservation is a bank of votes from the reserved people they won't respect the proposal of Dr. Ambedkar.

Dictatorship is basically some activist who leads a group of people fed up of corrupt government and go against it. Indian army is not as corrupt as politicians and hence if the army overthrows the Indian democracy we could have disciplined society. But we mustn't neglect the fact of restrictions imposed upon us. If we consider developed democracy, even if 1 of its citizen even may he/she be poor is protected if in danger.

So eventually I would say that well being of the nation begins at home if everyone who reads this even follows what's India's pledge will give certain contribution in India's well being. I hope one day we would be the BEST! I love India! And Must all do!

Rate this: +7 -3

Ss Quadri said: (Feb 11, 2015)  
Very nice discussion going on thought I would include some of my ideas also, I think that a dictator although may not sound too good for 21 st century people because of the bad history of the dictators, but this is something very important.

A parliament can't take quick decisions, in parliament the opposition unstabilizes the whole environment sometimes on the other hand a dictator along with his council can take advice's and then finally give a decision.


Rate this: +12 -7

Deepak said: (Feb 9, 2015)  
We don't need dictatorship what we need is strict enforcement of law. The punishment on the crime should be so severe that others can't even think of committing that crime again.

Rate this: +11 -7

Abhimanyu said: (Feb 9, 2015)  
Sisters and brothers of India, let me please make understand the importance of dictatorship and clear your conscience of influential impressions formed over decades of misleading facts provided by the subjugated intellectual authorities.

Considering the long history of India (some of it not recorded) India lost its importance and glory when it lost its brutality. The Indian civilization as we all know began and advanced well before any other known civilization. Hence as it is evident in the recent history that the more advancements and growth a country makes the less brutal it becomes and the more it comes under diplomatic foreign influences.

Therefore being established long before the Indian empire after completing its quota of (annexations, attack, division of kingdoms, establishment of dynasties, killings in the name of king) brutality, it became a stable militarily weakened and a moral and intellectual and peace loving empire. Taking advantage of this weakened brutality the foreign invaders ruled India for over 800 years. So after finally getting independence and recognition in 1947.

India should have re established its brutality and firmness to tackle the newly reformed world that is India needed a strong dictator to dictate terms instead of professing a new concept of democracy at that time.

Due to Indians lack of knowledge about the western idea of democracy India became a victim of unawareness and constituted a system of government divided on religious lines just to overcome its tendency to get exposed globally on how tough it was for India to sustain its diverse culture.

Hence I strongly believe that just one term of dictatorial or authoritarian government would have lifted India morally as well as economically as is the case of china. India would have been a more respected nation by the western world.

Rate this: +13 -8

Shiv said: (Jan 31, 2015)  
I completely agree with Bharat. We all are the part of world's largest democracy and proud of it because we know the position of dictatorship country. In these countries, there is so much restriction. In our country everyone has rights. In Saudi arabia if you were going to the shopping then you must carry with someone else. And democracy will give, the better living policies. We all are seen the worlds powerful country USA also stand due to democracy not for dictatorship.

Rate this: +7 -14

Ritika Sharma said: (Jan 21, 2015)  
To all those who feel that there should be dictatorship in INDIA, friends, if there would be dictatorship, you would not be even able to express this view of yours. We can debate here only because there is FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

And how can we forget the efforts of all the freedom fighters who fought for our freedom and not for the rule of one. If dictatorship would have been a better option, than there was no need of struggle for freedom because there was the dictatorship of the English people.

Another point is that everything takes its own time and charity begins at home. No development can take place until unless WE make collective efforts and don't just blame the government. There has been evident growth in India. So, in my opinion, we should be proud to be a citizen of the world's largest democracy.

Yet, there are some ill- effects of democracy as well and they can be removed by the laws and our own conscience. Spitting on roads can not be fined in this largely populated country. We have to think that it is our home and we only have to keep it clean.

Rate this: +69 -13

Shreyas said: (Dec 24, 2014)  
Friends lets not forget that dictatorship is all related to skill of convincing people in one direction and no matter then what comes in its way, but looking at India a country who has shown how people can develop, in spite of the different culture traditions and its huge population, where people have different opinions.

In my opinion we set a real good example for world to see how democracy can be practiced without being affected by any barrier and for that I think India do not need dictatorship its happy being democratic and in future it will show why democracy is good for it.

Many of my friends will say that why we still not developed but my dear friends I will ask you to be patient because some things which have thousands opinions need time but don't forget the fruit of patience is always sweet.

Rate this: +25 -10

Chris said: (Nov 30, 2014)  
If you look around the world today, there is no single country who was democratic before the country is developed.

All countries are developing one way another compared to its own country vertically. However, if you compared laterally, then democracy does harm the rate of the development as it takes time to reach a consensus.

Remember, whatever the policy or decisions made by government, there will be objections.

What ever policy or government made will harm some people, the questions is "will it benefit to majority or whole nation".

Rate this: +10 -9

Rj said: (Nov 17, 2014)  
Dictatorship is what India needs right now.

The present form of Government has devastated the entire nation both socially and economically. After losing the majority of the resources, its pointless to believe that substantial amendments can be made to bring the nation back to track in possible time.

Dictatorship on the other hand, if laid down, has its own benefits and cons as well. No form of governance can be explained as to be the best for current India as challenges are getting piled up one upon another.

While democracy has been around the corner for a few decades now, laying down the foundation for a new form of governance should be approached rationally fulfilling the need of the hour.

People can derive many examples of nations under stable dictatorship and also believed to be as a significant factor in their development.

Remember guys.

"Too many cooks ruin the food" whereas "All it takes is only one man to bring the necessary change".

Rate this: +22 -4

Shreya Inamdar said: (Oct 12, 2014)  
Its Good to have such discussions. But friends do notice 1 point here. It is the same "we" going to elect the person for both the cases 1) Dictatorship 2) Democracy.

Dictatorship could be more efficient one but on the other hand democracy plays a key role.

Dictatorship will lead to "progress" of country but Democracy leads to "Better" country.

Progress and Better which mean the same again ! if actually concentrate. Becoming Puppets to the political leaders is in our hands. As it is "we" who are electing them. I think what India needs is not whether it is democratic\autocratic? Rather it could be better if there exits mutual understanding between each which is almost a difficult thing to implement. First change "U" then say "society" because ultimately "Society is again U"!we can see Better India or autocratic India only when 1) Every child to old is EDUCATED with EMPLOYMENT 2) Eliminating the POVERTY which we are studying from LKG to 10 in schools but yet no one analyse it!

3) Finally stop practicing VIOLENT METHODS. Not necessary to mention as every know what they do!

Rate this: +33 -9

Nisha said: (Sep 29, 2014)  
No doubt, dictatorship is more efficient type of Government. The dictator is the master of his own will. His orders are the final orders. No one can dare refuse to carry them out. When a nation is down crushed a dictator certainly helps it is rising high. Through heavy penalties and punishments, he frees the country of all corruption. In war-time, no other Government is so efficient as dictatorship.

But dictatorship cannot last long. It is very difficult to get a good successor to a dictator. Einstein, the famous scientist, one said, "Dictators of genius are succeeded by scoundrels. " Germany became a terror to the world in the days of Hitler. Turkey was revolutionized and modernized by Mustafa Kamal Pasha. But after them, their countries again fell in darkness. Further, as the danger of going on a wrong path. There is no check on his powers. People cannot critics him or change the Government through constitutional means. They cannot express their views freely or pass their life in the way they think best. They have no rights. They must obey the dictator blindly. Man is thus reduced to the level of a dumb animal.

Hence dictatorship can't be the solution of India. We don't need to change the form of the Government but we need to reform it.

Rate this: +31 -6

What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Name *:

Email   : (optional)

» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.