Aptitude - Area - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Area - General Questions (Q.No. 8)
8.
A man walked diagonally across a square lot. Approximately, what was the percent saved by not walking along the edges?
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Let the side of the square(ABCD) be x metres.
Then, AB + BC = 2x metres.
AC = 2x = (1.41x) m.
Saving on 2x metres = (0.59x) m.
Saving % = | ![]() |
0.59x | x 100 | ![]() |
= 30% (approx.) |
2x |
Discussion:
39 comments Page 2 of 4.
Punni said:
5 years ago
@Riya.
Name the sqaure as ABCD. The person is moving from A to C (diagonally) instead of AB + BC (along the edges). As we can see the souce is point A and the destination is point C.
We actually need to find how much distance (edges) he saved by chosing to move from displacement (daigonally) aprt.
Name the sqaure as ABCD. The person is moving from A to C (diagonally) instead of AB + BC (along the edges). As we can see the souce is point A and the destination is point C.
We actually need to find how much distance (edges) he saved by chosing to move from displacement (daigonally) aprt.
(1)
Ramakanth said:
8 years ago
Please tell me an easy way to solve the problem with the clear explanation.
Senthil said:
8 years ago
@Amit kumar. How the edges are 7?
Navaneeth said:
9 years ago
If that person walked along edges. Approximately, what was the percent wasted by walking along the edges?
Please give me the answer.
Please give me the answer.
Riya said:
7 years ago
@All.
Along the edges, that means more than one side, so how come it has been decided that it is only 2 sides? Solution has been given only for 2 sides. Why?
Why it can't be 4 sides?
Along the edges, that means more than one side, so how come it has been decided that it is only 2 sides? Solution has been given only for 2 sides. Why?
Why it can't be 4 sides?
P.bharathi said:
2 decades ago
Saving on 2x metres = (0.59x) m.
How this step arise ? Please explain me clearly.
How this step arise ? Please explain me clearly.
AK Nirala said:
1 decade ago
You (Amit) choose the sides of a rectangle not SQUARE.
EXAMPLE METHOD.
According to Pythagoras FOR SQUARE the sides are 2 & 2 or diagonal 2*sqrt(2) = 2*1.141 = 2.828 {where sqrt(2) = 1.141}.
Edges are 2+2 then 4-2.828 = 1.172 (Difference).
(1.172/4)*100 = 29.3 = 30 approx.
Simple method:
Edge of square let be x.
Then diagonal of square will be 2 sqrt(x).
Edge distance - Diagonal distance (difference).
2x-2sqrt(x) = x (2-sqrt(2)) = (2-1.414)x = 0.586x.
%AGE.
(0.586x/2x)*100 = (0.586/2)*100 = 29.3 (30 approx).
EXAMPLE METHOD.
According to Pythagoras FOR SQUARE the sides are 2 & 2 or diagonal 2*sqrt(2) = 2*1.141 = 2.828 {where sqrt(2) = 1.141}.
Edges are 2+2 then 4-2.828 = 1.172 (Difference).
(1.172/4)*100 = 29.3 = 30 approx.
Simple method:
Edge of square let be x.
Then diagonal of square will be 2 sqrt(x).
Edge distance - Diagonal distance (difference).
2x-2sqrt(x) = x (2-sqrt(2)) = (2-1.414)x = 0.586x.
%AGE.
(0.586x/2x)*100 = (0.586/2)*100 = 29.3 (30 approx).
Amit Kumar Swain said:
1 decade ago
According to Pythagoras the side are 3&4 or diagonal 5.
Edges are 7 then 7-5=2 (Different).
(2/7)=(x/100).
Solve x=28.57142857 (i.e approximately 30).
Edges are 7 then 7-5=2 (Different).
(2/7)=(x/100).
Solve x=28.57142857 (i.e approximately 30).
Namrata said:
1 decade ago
I will go with @Ajay's method where he took side as 10 instead of variable.
Because is you take variable you go land up in confusion.
AC = Root of (2x).
Root of 2 = 1.41.
But what about root of x?
Because is you take variable you go land up in confusion.
AC = Root of (2x).
Root of 2 = 1.41.
But what about root of x?
Namrata said:
1 decade ago
AC = root (2x).
Root of 2 = 1.41.
But where did the root of x disappeared?
Root of 2 = 1.41.
But where did the root of x disappeared?
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers