What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
143 comments Page 7 of 15.

Aman said:   5 years ago
India needs dictatorship because one person's control can solve many problems like overpopulation, terrorism, and then there I'll be one focus on developing this great nation. Democracy can survive where people are civilized and believe in law and order here people wear a helmet because they don't want to pay for penalty rather than it is a safety for themself. It's been 70 years to our independence still we are stuck in the old system of work like a tortoise. When there is a terrorist attack on India some section of society celebrates as their success and no action taken by government There will be clarity in decision making and overall implementation of policies. A dictatorship can solve many of India's long going issues.
(36)

Rennett said:   9 years ago
India does not need a dictator, but a leader with strict discipline, a person who shows no partiality to anyone (rich or poor). He should grant justice. He should abolish prostitution and ban porn which would reduce rape attacks. He must bring back the black money stored in a Swiss bank and use it for the development of India. Punishments must be made severe so that people should be afraid to commit the crime. He must avoid foreign companies to invade India because they will rule us once again. If foreign companies start increasing, it will destroy many India companies. Then there will no Indian company, all companies will be foreign. Thus we will end up obeying their rules and they controlling us.
(28)

Sudhanshu said:   1 decade ago
It is no matter that whether it is democracy and autocracy it is good government which makes the difference but if we talk about India then I must favour autocracy because I feel it can do such thing which are not done by our democracy even in 60 year I want to named then corruption, reservations, communal riot. If power goes in one hand he is allow to do one hand and for that no one claim for that, take the example of china when he see that overpopulation he implemented the one child policy at the same time India also want to implement two child policy but he could not do because of democracy but china implement because of semi autocracy, that type things I want to express, thank you.
(11)

Amandeep Singh said:   10 years ago
In my point of view India don't need dictatorship although we know that India is facing many problems like unemployment, poverty and religious fights but that doesn't mean that dictatorship can alone solve theses problems.

Dictatorship may worsen these problems because as the people's choose their leaders which do wrong jobs we may choose wrong dictator who can directly control all the country and can do anything for his benefits. What we need is democracy with clear agenda of choosing the right people who has proved his ability by doing some right jobs in his life and on which we can trust that leaders who we know will definitely work for the development and growth of the country.
(30)

Torpedo said:   1 decade ago
Dictatorship will lead you to progress, but its not suitable for India where we have so much diversity of culture & the mindset of being ruled by a religious person, will not at all work with India's demography! Its more likely to ignite a civil war. Democracy is the vital part of India an Indian systems which empowers every citizen with special right towards making India a better Place. Dictatorship will lead India into a dark future of no friendly countries around its border India will not be able to retain the sustainability. Dictatorship has its own down points, as a single dictator cannot understand and lead the mass of India and the minor communities will feel left alone.
(7)

Anniket said:   1 decade ago
As there is no proven system for this country this country is running on just ideas and experiments all over these years, and don't be astonished to see no development no infrastructure in the coming years too.

The system of constitution is completely VOID in today's world. The simple thing we understand that when something is not working it has to be changed and if you can't make the difference.

Just simply outsource this nation to some other countries. This is the only solution cos to run a country we need a system that leading countries are equipped with. So unite and make this country a better place by placing the overall concept of constitution to outsourcing.
(7)

Drake said:   9 years ago
Well, I say my point in one sentence (INDIA REQUIRES DICTATOR) in India there are many political parties and most of their leaders are corrupt or doing corruption. We Indians seriously don't know how to use democracy. As water destroys a phone, politics destroys the relationship of the countries. Let me take an example India and Pakistan fight in war and politics but politics effect cricket a sport. Politics is destroying the spirit of the country. There should be only one permanent leader in India that will make India great. I don't support the democracy I support constitutional monarchy. India will follow the same constitution but not democratic but dictator.
(21)

Binu said:   1 decade ago
Hi.

I just want to say that after some 65 years of democracy in our country.

Are we satisfied?

Have we stop fighting on the name of religion, caste, creed etc?

Is there any growth in economy?

Is the gdp is growing?

Are we able to have a control over crime rate in our country?

Are we able to save our people from being beheaded by pakistan army?

AND THESE ALL QUES ARE STILL HERE IN DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT. SO WHY NOT WE SHOULD GIVE A CHANCE TO THE DICTATORSHIP?

Might possible we will have the solution for our problems. As we are bearing the repercussions of this democracy, so we can bear of the dictatorship also.

THANK YOU.
(27)

BHUPENDRA RAWAT said:   1 decade ago
Hello friends,

My name is Bhupendra Rawat. Dictatorship should not be in India because in dictatorship only one person will rule on the country, I would like to remember about ancient Indian there were lot of kings and Nawab. They used to make new law to live in his kingdom.

They used to do whatever they want, they never ask suggestion from any one. They used to try to defeat to each other and pile up. The result was that British did rule over the India. But in democracy do not allow so, in democracy, king is elected by people, people rule over the country, people makes law and follow. They have freedom to speak.

Thank you.
(7)

Roshan said:   9 years ago
Dictatorship; Word dictator-speak for itself.

Dictatorship is not that evil when the leader is pro-nationalist.

I think we need dictatorship.

We have seen many stuff in the name of freedom of speech.

Disrespectful toward motherland.

Kashmir issue.

Sudden growth in communalism during election.

What we need is pro-nationalist political party rather than dictator.

We need someone who directly slaps someone who starts communal politics for his own gain.

One who have power to fight against injustice and anti-national stuff its don't matter whether its took face of extreme hooliganism. (Nation first-religion afterwards).
(40)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.