What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Dear friends,

In our democratic country, there should be no place for dictatorship. We should respect to those who sacrificed their precious lives to get rid of dictatorship of English people for all of us as we are enjoying today. You can remember that time before independence when our brave men like Mahatma Gandhi, Subhash Chandra Bose, Azad, Sukhdev, Bhagat Singh and a large number of freedom fighters fought for us to make our life better than before.

They did not accept dictatorship of English people rather than to run them away to their own country our every freedom fighter made dictator himself (for English people) by following his own principles and values so that Indian people could not face dictatorship of foreigners again. We have fundamental rights under which we use different kind of powers distinctively.

Dictatorship will make it worse. Dictatorship will only work if a dictator wants to do something for his country but unlimited power. I don't think so dictatorship is gonna work. Government need's to change its policies. We can solve our country's problem in two ways :-

1. Our parliament should amend the constitution and give power to supreme court so that every single bill or law which is passing in parliament must be approved by supreme court both are the different systems of democracy which will limit misuse of power by the members of parliament. If there a corruption case against a minister than it is must for investigation agencies to submit report to the supreme court within 1 year and supreme court must have to take its judgment under 1 month.

2. Second there should be a minimum qualification requirement for every member of a party to fight election or a competitive examination to be eligible for taking part in election. Illiterate or uneducated people can't rule a country or state.

According to my point of view, India is a democratic country. There is no need of dictatorship for people country but political party must need to dictator, because at present time the member of party feel independent. There is no restricting rule for the member of party.

So according to me the chief of party should have to be dictator for his own member because party is run on the basis of their chief the member is follow his chief that they instruct. But dictatorship should not be for development.

When you represent the own country in world level at that time dictatorship is acceptable because it shows the power of country and economy. Dictatorship will only be acceptable on the basis of development, secularism, nutrility, non violence.

I think, everything that is wrong in India is due to the democracy. People have a say in everything, altering the right function of the country. Yes, I agree it is nice for the people to have the power of their own country but this means no strict law can be passed.

Essentially, if India wants to become a superpower, Indian needs to reduce the crime rate and make it known to the world. This can only be done by becoming a dictatorship. Dictatorship will definitely spark a fire among the people but in the long term; a criminal can be hanged, without any socialist people acting against the government.

I do not feel that abandoning the idea of democracy is the best way to deal with its apparent failure as a system of governance for the nation. I understand the frustration with the current system which makes one look to an all powerful leader unbound by the opinions of others. However, it is a dangerous delusion to think that a dictator would only work for the good of the people. What makes democracy a long and arduous process is the very same one which makes it a reliable and accurate process of decision-making.

Democracy is by the people, of the people and for the people. It is the best guarantee of equality. Those disappointed by the track record of democracy only need to look at the track record of dictatorships. Hitler was a dictator. Stalin was a dictator. The dissatisfaction of the people in dictatorships ultimately boils over in the form of violent revolutions.

In theory, dictatorships sound like a more efficient way of governance. However, the idea doesn't hold water in practice due to the very human nature of any leader. The power and absolute subservience of the citizens in a dictatorship make it possible for the dictator to think he can get away with anything. Quite simply, there is no way to ensure accountability of a dictator. That is why democracy, despite all its faults is our best bet at a better nation.

As there is no proven system for this country this country is running on just ideas and experiments all over these years, and don't be astonished to see no development no infrastructure in the coming years too.

The system of constitution is completely VOID in today's world. The simple thing we understand that when something is not working it has to be changed and if you can't make the difference.

Just simply outsource this nation to some other countries. This is the only solution cos to run a country we need a system that leading countries are equipped with. So unite and make this country a better place by placing the overall concept of constitution to outsourcing.

Not exactly a dictatorship, but a democratic dictator is all we need. To explain the meaning a party who is elected by the people with a complete majority in the parliament and then the best dictatorial leader among that party, who can impose his/her laws an views on the citizens.

Hello friends,

If we look back in history, the very first name comes in our mind is of Adolf Hitler, a German solider whose patriotism was misconstrued with dictatorship. It was he who lead his people for the need of country in availing prosperity, liberty and a strong nation. And today we can easily find how Germany has big impact not only in European union but also in the world in the field of science & technology, economics & politics. It does not mean practicing dictatorship by country's leader always have the same output only if it involves the idea of "country first".

In present scenario, we are racing to consolidate our self in the globe in every domain. Our markets are rising, Department of Science and Technology are being recognized across the globe, we are inching towards in developing a better, salubrious and safe place for our people, but in Snail's place as we vision to achieve "a developed nation" title only in this decade. A dictatorship attitude may enforce others to make the all possible work done in time remain either in fear or loyalty.

If the whole idea is channelized effectively, definitely, it will not only gear up all our on going objectives but also help us to achieve it in stipulated time. It is need of hour. It can better understand by taking example of china whom we are lagging behind even getting independence three years early.

I strongly feel believe that India require a dictator like Adolf Hitler so that the life style of the people changes and we can be witnessing a completely developed India.

Democracy with a pinch of dictator values is what India wants right now. By this I basically emphasise on the slow developments in our society. We Indians are people who work best under fear. Let's take example of wearing helmets, we wear helmets not because it keeps us safe but we wear it because we fear the traffic policemen who would otherwise impose a challenge on us.

Developement in India is today limited to that helmet when we see the "Danda" we develop, when we don't we pause. So according to me the parties should be limited to two or three so that people can easily judge. The elected must have right to make bold decisions and should only be questionable only to the highest authority so as to instill a sense of fear to work and development would be the result.