What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Hello everyone.

I would agree with Ritika. But taking the fact of politics in India passing of a bill is done on the basis of vote banks but not for well being of all. We Indians must love all other Indians. The type of government doesn't really affect the country its the public which does. If we ask why is USA so much developed, its just because they love each and every citizen of theirs, but in India its all majority wins principle.

And we can take the example of reservation, Dr. Ambedkar gave the proposal of reservation only for a decade but as our politicians learnt that reservation is a bank of votes from the reserved people they won't respect the proposal of Dr. Ambedkar.

Dictatorship is basically some activist who leads a group of people fed up of corrupt government and go against it. Indian army is not as corrupt as politicians and hence if the army overthrows the Indian democracy we could have disciplined society. But we mustn't neglect the fact of restrictions imposed upon us. If we consider developed democracy, even if 1 of its citizen even may he/she be poor is protected if in danger.

So eventually I would say that well being of the nation begins at home if everyone who reads this even follows what's India's pledge will give certain contribution in India's well being. I hope one day we would be the BEST! I love India! And Must all do!

Hello friends,

My name is Bhupendra Rawat. Dictatorship should not be in India because in dictatorship only one person will rule on the country, I would like to remember about ancient Indian there were lot of kings and Nawab. They used to make new law to live in his kingdom.

They used to do whatever they want, they never ask suggestion from any one. They used to try to defeat to each other and pile up. The result was that British did rule over the India. But in democracy do not allow so, in democracy, king is elected by people, people rule over the country, people makes law and follow. They have freedom to speak.

Thank you.

No friends, a dictator is the ideal form of government for India. In this vast country of diverse people, coming to a definite idea is an arduous task. Only a dictator can speed things up. Most of you will may take Adolf Hitler as an example to prove me wrong.

Well friends, Nazi Germany made tremendous progress in a short period of time had the antisemitism element been absent, it would've won the war and we see Adolf as a hero. Also the population in general was happy.

A majority of people would not join politics. So, might as well leave the government in the hands of one capable man who ensures the moral and material progress of the people. Only a dictator can root out social evils. Only a dictator can bring about a surge of intense nationalism.

A leader who as they say can walk with the kings yet not lose the common touch is the ideal leader.

As a my opinion India has required appropriate leader not a dictator. For this, we have required to understand our responsibility of citizenship. Today, due to carelessness of the people election is not done very well. There are many people who are not do a voting.

First we need to improve ourselves, before to saying wrong about any leader or country. Thus India has not required dictator. If we get dictator, we can not say this he or she will do a good deed for a country. He may improve mar to country. Thus in India public understanding is required aspect.

I think India don't need dictatorship India is a republic country and best as it is. If we let India rule under the dictators it will be the disrespect or slap on the face of our great freedom fighter who laid their today for our tomorrow and I cannot disrespect them.

We need Dictatorship but not in such a way that it should eradicate freedom of speech, religion etc. Because we should get of this corrupt politics in this country. Our opinion Dictatorship is surely needed.

India is a democratic country. Democracy means where there are more than one political party and the people of the country has right to elect their party. Dictatorship is where there is only man ruling the entire country. I would like to compare democracy and dictatorship with two economic terms competitive market and monopoly market respectively.

Competitive market is where there is more than one seller and monopoly is where there is only one seller in the market. The competition in the market among sellers help in reducing the price which benefits the consumers. Just like that in democratic country competition among these political parties definitely benefits the people of the country as the ruling party knows that if it does not serve the people they will not vote for it.

In monopoly as there is only one seller in the market it has total control over the price and it can increase the price according to its will which is not good for the consumers. Similarly if there is a dictatorship in the country the ruler or the ruling party knows that they can do whatever they feel like and nobody can challenge him as it used to happen during the ancient times where the king used to rule the entire kingdom. So I am against dictatorship.

In my opinion dictatorship is efficient but dictatorship is the rule by a single person which means that there is only one point of view for passing the law, amendment to the existing law or any other official matters.

On, the contrary in a democracy each and every decision is made on the basis of through discussion by our representatives which helps to bring in many different point of views, and helps to make a better decision and judgement about a particular issue.

Indians do not live the present times, they do not think future. Indians live only in the Past tense.

We are divided by languages, history and race. We nurture the separatism in our states, our cities, our lanes and in our hearts. We talk about kings, Nababs, Zagirdars and Zamindars.

Current democratic India is a ticking time bomb of population explosion, changed demography, hunger-water shortage, civil wars and chronic capitalism.

History is bunk! Burn all the history books. Boycott the elections- we do not want all these democratic farce & shams under which we suffered since independence! If we look into the future, it looks bleak. We need to face the future and change it today.

What India needs is Dictator to have will power of changing the things with hard decisions. But such idea looks utopian today in our country. Dictator like Singapore PM Li Kuan, dictator like Stalin, dictator like Fidel Castro.

But as long as we live in the past it cannot be done. We need to change and forget our past and look towards future. If people strongly desire it, a leadership will automatically emerge.

Loksabha elections 2014 have shown the people's strong will. But as long as it is democratic frame work nothing will work, because democracy and market driven economy is not going to deliver to last man standing.

If we need real state which can deliver then we should change, Believe in future and be ready for sacrifice.

India is a democratic country, only in theories! The politicians and our so called law makers, instead of following the words of the public, do shit only which gives them some good amount of the so called; black money. They eat the people's money, promising to do everything, before the elections, and after that, we see them in media. Its kinda becoming their own motion and not the people's, and certainly on a different page, than that of democracy.

I positively think; India needs a dictatorship rule, atleast to re-enforce and tighten some laws and rules, which can never be attained by simply thinking to tighten them in old ways.

These days, those people have power, who have some basic image in the public and have a well full of money! They under estimate the common man, and hence the word of the common man are silenced.

To bring about a reform, something more of a revolution, can only be achieved by something related to dictatorship only.