What India needs is a Dictatorship?

In my opinion dictatorship is efficient but dictatorship is the rule by a single person which means that there is only one point of view for passing the law, amendment to the existing law or any other official matters.

On, the contrary in a democracy each and every decision is made on the basis of through discussion by our representatives which helps to bring in many different point of views, and helps to make a better decision and judgement about a particular issue.

No, dictatorship doesn't solve anything it enslaves people and leaves the country poor and millions of people will be murdered and all of the citizens will lose their rights still want a dictatorship yes or no?

I think India needs a democraship i.e. a combination of democracy and dictatorship. In this form of govt some issues such as law making, crime, armed forces are handled through dictatorship and other issues such as education are handled through democracy. Simply speaking divide all the issues into two.

Dictatorship will lead you to progress, but its not suitable for India where we have so much diversity of culture & the mindset of being ruled by a religious person, will not at all work with India's demography! Its more likely to ignite a civil war. Democracy is the vital part of India an Indian systems which empowers every citizen with special right towards making India a better Place. Dictatorship will lead India into a dark future of no friendly countries around its border India will not be able to retain the sustainability. Dictatorship has its own down points, as a single dictator cannot understand and lead the mass of India and the minor communities will feel left alone.

Hello everyone!

As India is having many culture and religions, so giving all powers and rights to a single person always leads India to a unbalanced situation. As there is a cast system in India so that person will always be beneficial for his cast. So in my opinion democracy is better then dictatorship.

Thank you.

I completely agree with Bharat. We all are the part of world's largest democracy and proud of it because we know the position of dictatorship country. In these countries, there is so much restriction. In our country everyone has rights. In Saudi arabia if you were going to the shopping then you must carry with someone else. And democracy will give, the better living policies. We all are seen the worlds powerful country USA also stand due to democracy not for dictatorship.

Hello everyone.

I would agree with Ritika. But taking the fact of politics in India passing of a bill is done on the basis of vote banks but not for well being of all. We Indians must love all other Indians. The type of government doesn't really affect the country its the public which does. If we ask why is USA so much developed, its just because they love each and every citizen of theirs, but in India its all majority wins principle.

And we can take the example of reservation, Dr. Ambedkar gave the proposal of reservation only for a decade but as our politicians learnt that reservation is a bank of votes from the reserved people they won't respect the proposal of Dr. Ambedkar.

Dictatorship is basically some activist who leads a group of people fed up of corrupt government and go against it. Indian army is not as corrupt as politicians and hence if the army overthrows the Indian democracy we could have disciplined society. But we mustn't neglect the fact of restrictions imposed upon us. If we consider developed democracy, even if 1 of its citizen even may he/she be poor is protected if in danger.

So eventually I would say that well being of the nation begins at home if everyone who reads this even follows what's India's pledge will give certain contribution in India's well being. I hope one day we would be the BEST! I love India! And Must all do!

Hello friends,

My name is Bhupendra Rawat. Dictatorship should not be in India because in dictatorship only one person will rule on the country, I would like to remember about ancient Indian there were lot of kings and Nawab. They used to make new law to live in his kingdom.

They used to do whatever they want, they never ask suggestion from any one. They used to try to defeat to each other and pile up. The result was that British did rule over the India. But in democracy do not allow so, in democracy, king is elected by people, people rule over the country, people makes law and follow. They have freedom to speak.

Thank you.

As a my opinion India has required appropriate leader not a dictator. For this, we have required to understand our responsibility of citizenship. Today, due to carelessness of the people election is not done very well. There are many people who are not do a voting.

First we need to improve ourselves, before to saying wrong about any leader or country. Thus India has not required dictator. If we get dictator, we can not say this he or she will do a good deed for a country. He may improve mar to country. Thus in India public understanding is required aspect.

As there is no proven system for this country this country is running on just ideas and experiments all over these years, and don't be astonished to see no development no infrastructure in the coming years too.

The system of constitution is completely VOID in today's world. The simple thing we understand that when something is not working it has to be changed and if you can't make the difference.

Just simply outsource this nation to some other countries. This is the only solution cos to run a country we need a system that leading countries are equipped with. So unite and make this country a better place by placing the overall concept of constitution to outsourcing.