What India needs is a Dictatorship?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
143 comments Page 12 of 15.
Deepak said:
1 decade ago
We don't need dictatorship what we need is strict enforcement of law. The punishment on the crime should be so severe that others can't even think of committing that crime again.
(11)
Manish Ojha said:
1 decade ago
India is a democratic country. Democracy means where there are more than one political party and the people of the country has right to elect their party. Dictatorship is where there is only man ruling the entire country. I would like to compare democracy and dictatorship with two economic terms competitive market and monopoly market respectively.
Competitive market is where there is more than one seller and monopoly is where there is only one seller in the market. The competition in the market among sellers help in reducing the price which benefits the consumers. Just like that in democratic country competition among these political parties definitely benefits the people of the country as the ruling party knows that if it does not serve the people they will not vote for it.
In monopoly as there is only one seller in the market it has total control over the price and it can increase the price according to its will which is not good for the consumers. Similarly if there is a dictatorship in the country the ruler or the ruling party knows that they can do whatever they feel like and nobody can challenge him as it used to happen during the ancient times where the king used to rule the entire kingdom. So I am against dictatorship.
Competitive market is where there is more than one seller and monopoly is where there is only one seller in the market. The competition in the market among sellers help in reducing the price which benefits the consumers. Just like that in democratic country competition among these political parties definitely benefits the people of the country as the ruling party knows that if it does not serve the people they will not vote for it.
In monopoly as there is only one seller in the market it has total control over the price and it can increase the price according to its will which is not good for the consumers. Similarly if there is a dictatorship in the country the ruler or the ruling party knows that they can do whatever they feel like and nobody can challenge him as it used to happen during the ancient times where the king used to rule the entire kingdom. So I am against dictatorship.
(11)
Anonymous said:
8 years ago
India wouldn't accomplish anything even after dictatorship has come into the power. What we really need is to make people think rationally. How much money do you think is spent on eligious thing that we do? A lot probably. And I'm not saying people shouldn't follow their culture, they just should know when they are over doing it.
(11)
Shourya Sodhani said:
1 decade ago
A democracy is literally defined as by the people and for the people. A democracy helps the citizens of a nation stay involved in the happenings of their nation and elect the government that they feel will be the best for them and also gives them a sense of responsibility. The ones who are for dictatorships might say that the government, like in India may turn out to be corrupt and disastrous.
But there will always be someone, someone like Arvind Kejriwal for India who will attempt to solve our problems. In a dictatorship, if the ruler is corrupt, the citizens wouldn't even have any choice to re-elect another leader. Even if they attempt any rebel, they will only face severe punishment, maybe even death. So, I strongly feel that India needs a strong and intelligent leader rather than an oppressive dictator.
But there will always be someone, someone like Arvind Kejriwal for India who will attempt to solve our problems. In a dictatorship, if the ruler is corrupt, the citizens wouldn't even have any choice to re-elect another leader. Even if they attempt any rebel, they will only face severe punishment, maybe even death. So, I strongly feel that India needs a strong and intelligent leader rather than an oppressive dictator.
(10)
Rimpa said:
1 decade ago
No, according to my view, India is a democratic country where different races and different caste takes breath in this country, if dictator is exist in that country then the integrity and the sovereignty of the country will hamper and it will lead to a conflict among the people due to allotting of only one leader without people's permission. It may happen that the leader which is nominated may give importance to this people and he may behaving like an hilter.
(10)
Chris said:
1 decade ago
If you look around the world today, there is no single country who was democratic before the country is developed.
All countries are developing one way another compared to its own country vertically. However, if you compared laterally, then democracy does harm the rate of the development as it takes time to reach a consensus.
Remember, whatever the policy or decisions made by government, there will be objections.
What ever policy or government made will harm some people, the questions is "will it benefit to majority or whole nation".
All countries are developing one way another compared to its own country vertically. However, if you compared laterally, then democracy does harm the rate of the development as it takes time to reach a consensus.
Remember, whatever the policy or decisions made by government, there will be objections.
What ever policy or government made will harm some people, the questions is "will it benefit to majority or whole nation".
(10)
Saagar said:
1 decade ago
We need Dictatorship but not in such a way that it should eradicate freedom of speech, religion etc. Because we should get of this corrupt politics in this country. Our opinion Dictatorship is surely needed.
(10)
Kushnabh said:
1 decade ago
Hello everyone.
In my opinion, the way politics is done in our country is nothing less than a dictatorship. It is like dictatorship for fixed 5 years.
In democracy, people have a say, representatives have to implement the desires and needs of people. But in the political scenario of our country that is not the case. Representatives act like anything without caring for the needs of common man.
Hence what I want to say is that dictatorship-like rule is already there which is incapable of governing our country. What we need is democracy in its true sense.
In my opinion, the way politics is done in our country is nothing less than a dictatorship. It is like dictatorship for fixed 5 years.
In democracy, people have a say, representatives have to implement the desires and needs of people. But in the political scenario of our country that is not the case. Representatives act like anything without caring for the needs of common man.
Hence what I want to say is that dictatorship-like rule is already there which is incapable of governing our country. What we need is democracy in its true sense.
(9)
Ajai said:
1 decade ago
Dictatorship is not a correct solution of India.
You seen in world every country now want democratic so how we want autocracy.
Elimination or ban anything is not a solution while changing the condition and make a system good by doing any thing is a solution.
Just like some people talks if India have power in president hand and army hand then it is good. But you think that if they are doing same thing or even worst thing then what would happens instead of that whatever system is there make it transparent better.
You seen in world every country now want democratic so how we want autocracy.
Elimination or ban anything is not a solution while changing the condition and make a system good by doing any thing is a solution.
Just like some people talks if India have power in president hand and army hand then it is good. But you think that if they are doing same thing or even worst thing then what would happens instead of that whatever system is there make it transparent better.
(9)
Idhayam said:
1 decade ago
Hi all,
India is an democracy country everybody know it after freedom. We are fast growing everything include corruption also but we not fell down. In dictatorship India no one will give guaranty to this kind of improvement. Example we take our neighbour country pakistan in that country change democracy and dictatorship also still that country struggle to get improvement. My conclude is democracy is good for our nation.
India is an democracy country everybody know it after freedom. We are fast growing everything include corruption also but we not fell down. In dictatorship India no one will give guaranty to this kind of improvement. Example we take our neighbour country pakistan in that country change democracy and dictatorship also still that country struggle to get improvement. My conclude is democracy is good for our nation.
(8)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers