Marriage is a social trap

In India, marriage is the most spiritual relationship. We believe that two people (male and female) will be together for the rest of their lives and live happily.

In the old golden days, marriage was considered as the relation of two families that combine to begin a new family, while the current marriage scenario seems to be a social trap. However, every aspect has to different angles the positive and negative so it depends on people how take it it can be taken it in a positive way and negative too. Thank you.

In my opinion, marriage is not a trap, it is a bond between two people who live their lives with each other. If both couples think they are equally important to each other and respect their values in the married life, I think marriage life may be happy. Marriage is not a two-person bond but it's a bond of family also.

In my opinion, marriage is not a social trap. It's a phase of life in which both partners get the opportunity to understand their emotions and behaviour and build a bond of rules and responsibility.

This also shows that they are not trapped by society but connected with the silence of love, which is needed to serve the marriage phase and give the edge to join socially.

I don't believe marriage is a social trap.

In my opinion, it's a meaningful partnership based on mutual understanding. If both individuals truly respect and understand each other marriage can become a lifelong journey of support and growth.

A life partner is someone who stays with you till the end not because of society's pressure, but because of the bond you share.

According to me, Marriage is not social trap, because marriage is a heartfelt bonding between two persons. It is a bonding & understanding between two persons, also their is a caring among them. In any situation one can understands the his/her feelings & thinking.

In short, I want to say that marriage is not at all a social trap. It is a always our personal decision.

Marriage, in my opinion, is not a "social trap" but rather another means to form a "social bond" with various people.

Now, I'd like to emphasise the word bond; we learn about several individuals who are commonly referred to as relatives. It's a technique to broaden one's family and find connections in a new social group.

It is true that sometimes it takes time to adjust, as is the case not only in marriage but in any bond we attempt to form.

I don't think marriage is a social trap for all individuals in society. It is for the people who want to achieve something great through work, something they are interested in, but not allowed to due to the pressure of their families or in-laws. Or due to the new responsibilities they are made responsible for.

If we have supportive families who allow us even after being married and help us through daily responsibilities marriage is nothing like a trap.

Thank you for giving me the opportunity.

You’ve expressed your idea clearly, but let’s polish the sentence structure, spelling, and flow to make it stronger and easier to understand. Here’s a corrected and improved version of your statement.

Hello, everyone, we are discussing whether marriage is a social trap. In my perspective, Marriage is a bond between two people. When we enter into it, it teaches us responsibility, forgiveness, loyalty, and decision-making. All these qualities can be learned through marriage. Marriage is a personal choice. If two people agree to share their lives, how can it be called a social trap?

First of all, I say everyone knows marriage is not just a trap it is made when two individuals (male and female) respect, love, and understand emotions. Both are comfortable with each other and have a good relationship. I also know that some marriages make a trap and the life worse. So before deciding on marriage, it is important to know the person to have a successful marriage.

Thank you.

Yes, marriage is a trap, but only when it comes to arranged marriage.

When the time comes both the female and male species are asked together only when the time of ritual where he or she may have different ideology on life but may not have time or private space where they can discuss in the sense only both the grooms nd brides parents come together and talk about their missed out ideology and if it supports they procced but they never willing to know or try to get to knom on how their child feels nd what are their expectations all they see is the boys parent look whether the girl got enough education, her background, caste, religion, and how much she tries to respect her in laws and about her willingness to work for that family, even how much dowry she can bring with her. Etc.

When it comes to the boys side the girls' parents look at the groom's appearance, salary, education, siblings, their background, how much they are spending on things, their own house and also they gotta check their job security.

So there is no point, or there is nothing discussed which needs to be. The parents actually shouldn't be involved in this.

Both the boy and girl need to discuss the expenditure they going make, and how they are gonna survive, about their job, sharing their salary, etc.

But in the name of marriage, I'll say the Indian parents wanna show their wealth or something that isn't visible. The only actual visible thing which is in front of them is their kids. But they are just avoiding the fact that the kids are grown into an full adult. Nd they got the knowledge of choosing their partner wisely.