Food Comes First, Ethics Later

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
127 comments Page 10 of 13.

Mehak said:   1 decade ago
Yes. I too think that food comes first, ethics later. As said even by our elders "HEALTH IS WEALTH". If we are not well (physically or mentally) , how can we be able to interact with others, do and manage our work effectively or participate actively in any event? So, in my view, it is the food that must be given preference over the ethics.
(16)

Amit said:   7 years ago
As, I believe food comes first why I m giving reasons to support my statement if we consider Maslow need hierarchy theory of motivation then we can see that in first stage i.e, physiological need which comprises of food, cloth, shelter because an empty stomach cannot consider for ethics so I believe food comes first ethics later.
(29)

Divya Bhatnagar said:   2 decades ago
Hi! friends, I'm totally agree with you all...
As we all are aware about the fact that food is the basic source of energy in life, without having food, we can not respond to the things in are practical and stressful life, ethics have their importance after food.. as with food only we get the power to perform any task in life....
(6)

Sunaina said:   1 decade ago
I agree with you Nandana. A Person who is very rich but without any ethical values, He is never recognized or respected. A person is recognized with his ethics. Just consider in the world, we Indians are popular for our ethical values n culture, more than anything else. Ethics add value to anything, be it a person or a country.
(4)

Viveck saini said:   2 decades ago
No doubt in above lines that "FOOD COMES FIRST, ETHICS LATER"
You cant imagine a life without food whereas one can survive without proper shelter and clothing, i agree with vasanth that "In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first"
Ethics are also important but not more than food in any way.
(1)

SOUMYA said:   1 decade ago
Noway. It is clear that food is everything in our day to day life. Also I support "ethics". It has some role in a human being's life. But not so much important as food.

If there is food then there is life. If there is life than there is ethics.

So we can conclude that.

"FOOD MAKES ETHICS. ETHICS ONLY SUPPORT IT".
(24)

Gauravgaur said:   1 decade ago
Ethics make man, but food destroy man.

According to me ethics come first because it will manage your digestive system very well but by excess food you can't manage your digestive system by food ethics will improve your personality and set up your mind according to your work and help us to perform work very well.
(9)

Devendra singh said:   1 decade ago
Hi friends, I feel that 'food comes first than ethics' because when a person, who is very tired & hungry, needs food as primary need not ethics. When no-one will alive then what will be the need ethics.

We know ethics is very necessary to live us as human being. But it should come after the food.
(12)

Saurabh said:   1 decade ago
Ethics and food are the two sides of a coin. If you talk about the ethic of a person who is hungry and searching for food his ethics can't help him out. Because our ethics can't fulfill the hungry stomach of a person. Hence food comes first than the ethics. Food is the basic need of a human being.
(30)

Anu said:   9 years ago
Hai friends, here our topic is about food and ethics.

According to me, whatever work we do is only for getting food for feeding ourselves. Its basic criteria for all humans. After fulfilling our basic needs. We should follow our ethics. Of course, ethics is also a basic of survival in society.
(16)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.