Food Comes First, Ethics Later
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
127 comments Page 13 of 13.
Veni said:
1 decade ago
I agree with Nandana. Because t situation decides t importance of anyone. One who is starving food alone knows about t importance of it. Once you have t basic needs, you start following t ethics.
(1)
Rajesh said:
1 decade ago
My point is food is the primary need of all living things in the world. So the first priority should for the food, no one can become a philosopher without having good nutrition in the life...
(1)
Bharath said:
1 decade ago
I agree with Shanmu and Swapnika said, ethics are for showing the path to the people for easy achievement of their goals and living in manner, but without taking food we cannot survive...
(1)
Vasanth said:
1 decade ago
In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first. Then he started to develop his civilization like clothes shellter and all those things so food is first for my opinion.
(3)
Padma said:
1 decade ago
This statement is really a true one because we can't survive without food. Ethics is also important for human life but until or unless we need food to follow our ethics.
(3)
Ramki said:
1 decade ago
Hi, ethics are important but after getting food. Because, without food not up to the ethics even human being can't survive.
(4)
Jamila said:
1 decade ago
Its true that food comes first , ethics later.
After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.
After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.
(2)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers