Food Comes First, Ethics Later

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
127 comments Page 1 of 13.

Neha said:   1 decade ago
It's really surprising why my friends forgeting the contribution of lagends like Bhagat Singh, who surpassed this notion of food being a basic necessary and showed that if you respect your ethics, the history will remember you as an exception.

Ani said:   1 decade ago
Yes friends food comes first later on we concentrating ethics and the remaining, because with out food how far we can stay on the earth. This is not a meaning that taking food at the every movement.

Ani said:   1 decade ago
Ethics are the most precious to us to live as good citizen in the society.if you follow the ethics then you can recognized by the persons which are living in the society or from our our family members also.

Siri said:   1 decade ago
Of course ethics are most precious to live as a good citizen, but firstly to survive or to live itself we need the food, without survival of human being, how can they follow ethics, even though ethics are important but only after food.

Bharath said:   1 decade ago
I agree with Shanmu and Swapnika said, ethics are for showing the path to the people for easy achievement of their goals and living in manner, but without taking food we cannot survive...

Padma said:   1 decade ago
This statement is really a true one because we can't survive without food. Ethics is also important for human life but until or unless we need food to follow our ethics.

Vasanth said:   1 decade ago
In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first. Then he started to develop his civilization like clothes shellter and all those things so food is first for my opinion.

Viveck saini said:   1 decade ago
No doubt in above lines that "FOOD COMES FIRST, ETHICS LATER"
You cant imagine a life without food whereas one can survive without proper shelter and clothing, i agree with vasanth that "In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first"
Ethics are also important but not more than food in any way.

Jamila said:   1 decade ago
Its true that food comes first , ethics later.

After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.

Josh said:   1 decade ago
Food and etthics are same in one perspective. If ethics are dissolved, survival of a person is useless. If food is not there, survival doesn't exist, beside agreeing the fact food is 1st, ethics are next.

Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.