Electronics and Communication Engineering - Exam Questions Papers
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 12
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 22
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 21
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 20
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 19
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 18
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 17
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 16
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 15
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 14
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 13
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 1
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 11
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 10
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 9
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 8
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 7
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 6
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 5
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 4
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 3
- Exam Questions Papers - Exam Paper 2

Consider
Number of samples per period = 10p
This is not a rational number. Hence signal is non periodic.

The area of the shaded region
.
- f[h(t) e-3t] converges
- h(t) has finite duration
- H(s) = H(- s)
Statement 1 is false, since f{h(t)e3t} corresponds to the value of the Laplace transform of h(t) at s = 3.
If this converges, it implies that s = - 3 is in the ROC.
A casual and stable system must always have its ROC to the right of all its poles. However, s = - 3 is not to the right of the pole at s = - 2.
Statement 2 is false, because it is equivalent to stating that H(0) = 0. This contradicts the fact that H(s) does not have a zero at the origin.
Statement 3 is false. If h(t) is of finite duration, then if its Laplace transform has any points in its ROC, ROC must be the entire s-plane.
However, this is not consistent with H(s) having a pole at s = - 2.
Statement 4 is false. If it were true, then H(s) has a pole at s = - 2, it must also have a pole at s = 2.
This is inconsistent with the fact that all the poles of a causal and stable system must be in the left half of the s-plane.
A quantity of any substance equal to its molecular weight in grams is a mole of that substance contains the same number of molecules as one mole of any other substance. This Avogadro's number and equals 6.02 x 1023 molecules per mole. Thus
= 9.03 x 1028 electrons/m3
Since for tungsten the atomic and the molecular weights are the same. Therefore for tungsten
EF = 3.64 x 10-19(η)2/3
= 3.64 x 10- 19(9.03 x 1028)2/3
EF = 7.326 eV.
∴ VP = 3.46 x 108 m/s.