What India needs is a Dictatorship?

The debate whether India needs dictatorship can go on for a long time so far as until India becomes fully developed nation which again means a very very long time or almost near to impossible considering the present rate of improvement, but one thing is for sure after all these years through, the great souls of legendary revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, Sukhdev and Rajguru might be wondering today "was it really worth it".

Divide and Rule policy by British government or,

Caste based vote bank politics by Indian politicians.

Loot of India wealth by British govt in their whole time period. or,

Loot of Indian wealth by Indian politicians in the last 70 years.

Was it really worth a freedom for all those sacrifices.

INDIA DON'T NEED DICTATOR but there should be rules and laws and QUICK Actions like other countries for respective crimes, and punishment should be same As 1for all, every individual should have control in him whatever it may be, if he doesn't like thief should be punished by cutting his hands, raper should be punished by cutting his reproductive organ if strict government laws will be followed NO one will dare or even think of doing any crime, knowledge is everything but knowledge should able to discriminate between good and bad that knowledge makes sense.

Yes, we need a dictator in country like India, peoples are uncivilised, people do as they wish in their own way and officers or politician are under the control of many don gundas, and businessman. We need strict rule over the people of India to reduce crime over women.

India does not need a dictator, but a leader with strict discipline, a person who shows no partiality to anyone (rich or poor). He should grant justice. He should abolish prostitution and ban porn which would reduce rape attacks. He must bring back the black money stored in a Swiss bank and use it for the development of India. Punishments must be made severe so that people should be afraid to commit the crime. He must avoid foreign companies to invade India because they will rule us once again. If foreign companies start increasing, it will destroy many India companies. Then there will no Indian company, all companies will be foreign. Thus we will end up obeying their rules and they controlling us.

It is the people of the country, who make the country developed. We are not living in that ancient period where we are dependent only on leaders for showing us the way. We are educated and aware enough to express our views on a platform. So if we want a change in our political system we have to enter into it.

Therefore saying that dictatorship will end our problems is not right. Dictatorship has never been good as we can see from past experience. It can be good only for a particular section of a society not for a nation as a whole. And especially for India which is so diverse and a single person cannot understand the diversified problems of people.

Many of my friends gave an example of Adolf Hitler but does we really want to be ruled by such leader who as racist views against other communities. I think we should not say blindly that dictatorship is good.

In my opinion, this dictatorship is not the feasible option for India.

India needs 'dictatorship' right now we have been in democracy for about 68 years and that clearly didn't work. Now if we are choosing dictator then the same story will happen. The dictator should have best qualities of hitler. Dictator should capable of getting the powers himself and he should only become dictator whose only intention is to develop India.

It's not dictatorship which is need of the hour, it is the improvement of current functioning and having our eyes and ears open to the changes around us and pockets closed for the corrupt ones. We are empowered with online grievance portal by the government, a strong media, and few good politicians.

On the other hand dictatorship can not be termed as a solution because we don't know whether it will improve the situation or worsen it, it is only better to improve what we are having in our hands.

In my opinion, Even though India is democratic, no one gets an equal opportunity to express their ideas and views regards rules and regulations in the system. People who were rich and had fame can able to give the decisions and ideas. So, how far is it really working? For example, in elections we know that particular candidate encourages corruption still we can't avoid that person because of his name and fame. We can't avoid corruption in our system. If the entire system failed to implement such things if a dictator performs correctly and makes in developing and implementing successfully. Then that particular dictator is good rather than the entire system.

So I would like to say that if dictator performance and ruling is good then entire system. Then it's good to better encourage dictatorship rather than Government system.

India needs 'dictatorship' right now we have been in democracy for about 68 years and that clearly didn't work. There is an extreme need of dictatorship for us and we need to adopt Nazism, which is a clear guidance for dictatorship, so either speaking about dictatorship in India we should talk about "NAZISM in INDIA".

In democracy, we are still in control of these selfish leaders. There should be more and more participation of people in decision making, this is what democracy says. But I have never seen any common people participating in decision making.

I would say, a good dictator and the type of dictator who thinks of the country's situation and really want to serve India, then that is 100. Better than this corrupt democracy.

In India, judiciary system is not good. It is very, very slow.