What India needs is a Dictatorship?

No, the country needs dictatorship. India is already doing well. Also, corruption is not a big problem.

Illiteracy is. If we can just provide an opportunity for education to each and every citizen it is enough. I m not talking about quality education just a not too low-level education. This is enough. We don't have our views and we all are not able to go into politics and correct it. You or I are of this much capable most of the people are not. If we can just do this.

More than 1 billion educated Indians can change the entire planet.

Yes, India needs dictatorship because main problem of this country is population, we should talk about population reduction. We should take extreme measures to control population like only child or stopping child birth for next 5 years. I think if sanjay Gandhi would have been alive this country would be different place all together. Bad luck for India he died so soon.

Yes! India definitely needs dictatorship because a country's development need suggestions but not advices of each individual. There will always be pros and cons of each decision taken. For instance why do we have elections at each level? to elect at area level then at state level then at country level. Electing one politician has become a tug of war right inside the country which literally weakens the strength of our country, instead if we have one dictator or rather a leader to rule but with that too, many citizens wouldn't agree so an alternative to that might be in such a way that a citizen do not lose his/her list of freedom but still they are bound to laws of country which might be decided by the dictator. Talking about the dictator might be elected directly instead of electing between two political parties. If the dictator works with a wrong motif for a country then it is possible, that individual can be dethroned and can be considered the least respected citizen. So the idea is to keep India under part Dictatorship.

In 70 years democracy gives us nothing. All muslims should be killed or forced them to leave the country. India only belongs to Hindus. Muslim's are bastardy.

Let me tell you what a dictatorship feels like a one-man show controlling all the diverse people of India.

Now let's assume that guy has some sort of hatred for a particular race/ section of India, he would issue orders to get that entire race socially oppressed.

One man just can rule a culturally diverse country like India.

Yes, of course, India needs dictatorship. It's because till we Indians are under the British rule we had things that were far better from now. Now, we see things that are losing its true nature. Corruption is having its hand on the higher level. The democracy is having nothing to do because it's busy on its way making money out of everything. And if the governance is that of a dictatorship India will work wonders. Because then at least with the fear at least people may change their attitude towards society and at least then a kind of communalism can then occur. Shakespeare has once quoted spare the rod spoil the child. This means till the governance is not strict at its part, change can NVR be expected. So India is in need of strict discipline for It DICTATORSHIP is the best governance.

Yes, I do think India needs a dictatorship. India being a diverse nation faces many problems in which corruption has a major role when there is dictatorship this can be eradicated. Besides, India has a reservation even by today in all fields for which talented people are losing their opportunities and it can only be abolished by a dictatorship.

I think India needs dictatorship. India cannot develop until her people are held by a fixed pole and for that we need a dictator.

Many of you may think that a dictator in India can become a reality because of India's diversity. But Indians do share a common past. That spirit can only hold Indians together. That happened during colonial period and so it can happen now too. So before we talk about any other qualities of an Indian dictator we must make sure that he is a true nationalist.

Now some of you may also think that even if India gets a good dictator what will happen after he dies. The answer is also given in our history books. One generation of nationalists created the next. In this way the struggle against the British continued. So the same principle can be applied for a dictator too as he should be perhaps the greatest of all revolutionaries.

India can never become a superpower until the ideology of 'one people one nation one leader' is popularised and is practised among the people of this country.

India wouldn't accomplish anything even after dictatorship has come into the power. What we really need is to make people think rationally. How much money do you think is spent on eligious thing that we do? A lot probably. And I'm not saying people shouldn't follow their culture, they just should know when they are over doing it.

I think India needs dictatorship as for last 68 years we have democracy and we can see the rate of our development had there been a good dictator in India it would have shown spectacular growth till today votes are been purchased by corrupt leaders the illiterate are been exploited badly as they do not have a say in choosing leaders on the basis that he or she will further take India to great heights but for certain amount of money because of poverty in India moreover I think so as if India needs a dictator who can indeed make India a developed nation from a developing one all I want to say that India don't need a dictator like a fanatic leader it needs a good leader who should be secular more importantly a quite genius to look after diversities related issues then I am quite sure we would be far better in China it achieved great heights in 60 years as America has done in past 200 years in India judiciary here is quite slow let us look forward to a country like India being governed by someone say good leader or more accurately a dictator.