What India needs is a Dictatorship?

It is very nice to read all your ideas on whether India needs a Dictator or Democracy.

First thing we should understand that Dictator can not be elected or installed. He emerges from the situation/problem and take control of the country. If he is good the country will definitely benefit from it. Otherwise like many African countries which are under different types of Dictators suffer.

One thing I failed to understand why all these posts failed to mention the current situation of Dictatorship in Africa which will provide us with many cues.

In My opinion, India yes do require dictatorship in a some sense. In last few years we have seen that the gov. Has failed on my fronts either it be economic, health care or defense. We really need a strong leader at the centre who can take tough decisions on every front. Democracy with a strong and tough leader is far much better than pure dictatorship.

Dictatorship is not a correct solution of India.

You seen in world every country now want democratic so how we want autocracy.

Elimination or ban anything is not a solution while changing the condition and make a system good by doing any thing is a solution.

Just like some people talks if India have power in president hand and army hand then it is good. But you think that if they are doing same thing or even worst thing then what would happens instead of that whatever system is there make it transparent better.

INDIA NEEDS A DICTATOR.

While we talk of dictatorship we always tend to think and give examples of nazis and fascists etc but think of this, if we talk about voting a right candidate to power why can't a honest person come to power by himself and lead by example now thats a possibility. Democracy is new to India and its just few decades old and look at its condition, people have lost faith on the government entirely. We are a deadly mix of people who were never meant to remain together But all we need is a cohesive force, a force so powerful that will not only bind us with fear but peace, stability and development. The dictatorship in India should be like as follows:

1. The revised constitution will be the only holy book of law.

2. A party with nationalistic programmes and no hidden agenda.

3. No reservations but instead robust facilities and talent development.

4. Governmental participation based on education, experience and likeness of public.

5. No appeasement politics but yes the hinduism should be taught to the world as this is the only land for hindus.

6. A uniform civil code and cooperative participation from grassroot levels.

7. Everything that is anti-national should be banned.

8. Sanskrit should be made compulsory at schools.

9. A single party in which anyone can participate.

10. 5 year elections will still be conducted but with revised and best election procedures.

11. Revision of authority and simpler governance mechanisms in place.

12. Growth, prosperity and city hygiene should be first on agenda.

13. Religious and cultural organisations should be monitored and any hate propaganda should be met with strict punishment.

14. The glory days of India should be brought back with efficient and honest governance and full public participation.

I can write many such points but at the end of the day its our necessity and our desperation and frustration with the current state of affairs that has led us to find the best way to drive our nation. And last but not the least isn't it that our so called 5 year governance is actually TEMPORARY DICTATORSHIP. THINK ABOUT THAT. AND YES IF YOU HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT YET AS TO WHO DICTATES YOU NOW FIND OUT WHO YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE.

. .PEACE. .

No, all that India needs to be a superpower is that the educated people like you and me should understand our responsibility well and contribute to its prosperity by our deeds. Had we been realising this since we got freedom the scenario would have been quite different. We call names to the politicians and say damn things about them and escape even the most important role to be played as a citizen of a democracy - VOTING - just on the pretext that all the politicians are the same and we will not vote to any.

While saying so we do not realise that this is our vote which could make the difference because we will always be choosing a lesser evil, even if the assumption of all the politicians being evil is correct.

If we would be choosing the least evil since our independence the best evil would have come out by now to rule the country. This is we who waste most of the precious resources of the country which are not in abundance and leave the weaker section deprived of, for instance, drinking water, electricity, cooking gas, fuel etc. Etc. The bold and clear question in front of we the intellect and educated people is WHO GETS DIRTY TO CLEAN THE HOUSE OF OUR OWN. In fact the weaker and uneducated section of our society is not even aware of the responsibilities of a responsible citizen.

So how can we expect him to have less children and not increase the already burgeoning population of the country. Again this is we who can educate them at least as much as it is necessary to read and write. Do we not encounter in our everyday life at least one such illiterate person who comes across our routine life and we can educate him/her?

The only reason why we can post/comment on anything is because of the democracy in India. Every ideology comes with benefit and flaws so do democracy and dictatorship.

If we want dictatorship we all should be ready to not to raise voice against anything. No choices, no protest against low wages given to labourers etc. Staying in a democratic country we cannot imagine how does it feel living in a country follows dictatorship, look at middle east countries!.

Talking about myself I am proud to be the citizen of a secular country where if I want I can make changes in politics because democracy allows me to do so.

Hi Friends, I am Shashank. This topic sounds to be a very interesting one.

I personally feel that the giving the country, especially like India, which is diversified in its every aspect, to the hands of the dictator is like nothing but inviting the problems yourself. Some of my friends think that yes the dictatorship is good as the dictator is free to take the decisions firmly and will be able to eradicate the problems like corruption, terrorism but would happen if he himself terrified the country with his acts. One can't imagine what would be the pic of India then. I do agree but that he also may be best and can take the country to zenith heights of success but then to this point I would like to quote an English proverb.

"Two heads are better than one".

So instead of choosing the dictator we should try to be a responsible citizen first and then we should also try to to elect a best candidate possible, not from selected list, i.e from list available to you, but from the list we the people of India think should be.

Only after then we can think of a glorified India.

Thank you.

No, according to my view, India is a democratic country where different races and different caste takes breath in this country, if dictator is exist in that country then the integrity and the sovereignty of the country will hamper and it will lead to a conflict among the people due to allotting of only one leader without people's permission. It may happen that the leader which is nominated may give importance to this people and he may behaving like an hilter.

Even though we take a lot of pride in saying that " India is the world's largest democracy ", the outcome of this form of government has been far from satisfactory. Inflation, scams and scandals, lower gdp, rising level of crime, all these have torn apart the country and led to the lowering of morale of the citizens.

As is said " Too many cooks spoil the broth ", the mayhem in India is a classic example in support to this. Our so called worthy democrats, the people whom we pin our hopes upon, are often unable to reach to a satisfactory decision on topics of national interest and have a divided opinion. In case of a person having an autonomous authority at least we would be served with concrete decisions which we could chew upon and would yield results. At Least he would not sit mum while our territory is being seized by our " neighbors " but would take action.

The current form of government has not yielded any positive results and we still remain a third world country. Change is the only constant and we should be more receptive to autocratic form of government too.

First of all, India is a democratic country and democracy has been defined as "of the people, by the people and for the people". So the power is with the people and if there is a problem in a democratic country it is the fault of the people, For example we all make a big fuss and complain that the roads are dirty in India. Who is the one dirtying the road? Is it the government, no it's us the people. So basically the problem with India is that the citizens are misusing the freedom given to the people. So I strongly believe that India is needs a dictatorship for a few years till The Indians becomes disciplined.