What India needs is a Dictatorship?

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
143 comments Page 10 of 15.

Amol sakpal said:   9 years ago
INDIA DON'T NEED DICTATOR but there should be rules and laws and QUICK Actions like other countries for respective crimes, and punishment should be same As 1for all, every individual should have control in him whatever it may be, if he doesn't like thief should be punished by cutting his hands, raper should be punished by cutting his reproductive organ if strict government laws will be followed NO one will dare or even think of doing any crime, knowledge is everything but knowledge should able to discriminate between good and bad that knowledge makes sense.
(16)

Sdpmmna said:   9 years ago
Democracy is a form of dictatorship where the people get to decide who the dictator should be.
(16)

Aman Shankar said:   7 years ago
I don't believe dictatorship is the solution and I also don't believe that India has seen zero development since independence if anything the mindset of the people have changed, the people during independence were fed up with the British all of them wanted freedom and were ready to fight to death for it because their actions would impact the future generations which led to relatively rapid development in the beginning when people still had that spirit and dedicated their life to improvement of the country. But after a few generations this spirit kinda died off no one wants to go through all this trouble just so they can make a better country for their children. In fact a lot people want their children to get out of India and get a good job somewhere else in a developed country. Everyone likes to complain about the state of India but no one wants fix it themselves. There are not many people left like the first prime ministers of India. The people now just want to improve their own life and the easy way is to either move to more developed area or country. No one wants to struggle for the countries improvement just few complains about the situation. India needs citizens who are united and hustle for the betterment of the country. After all the people of a country is what makes it developed or poor if India is in a third world country it's simply because of the people. Democracy is the government of people, if the people don't want to govern well maybe they deserve to live a shit life.
(16)

Suk14 said:   7 years ago
First, I want to clear that I love the amazing place people call India. I don't have any grudge against it, the only reason I ever thought about this, is because of the political system which has plague the nation. Looking only from growth prespective at the time of our Independence both India and China had similar gdp. Aussuming that the condition we're same for growth, China is approx 10-20 times ahead of us. Taking in consideration that India has been involved in multiple wars with other nation and within our own nation. It should have grown to 4-5 times when compared to China. But the reality is entirely different the government hasn't even able to fully modernize the nation and reachability through road has also been a big question mark. I am baffled when I see old people who were so committed to change the nation and people now who just want to make money no matter how many lives they ruin.

I know I am small and I may not know the other side of the coin or even both the sides. But I am open to suggestions and only to constructive feedback.

PS: I know that Chinese dictatorship is not that good as most of the bad news gets suppressed due the control and censorship and most of the people who resist it get wacked.
(16)

Sanjay said:   1 decade ago
Indians do not live the present times, they do not think future. Indians live only in the Past tense.

We are divided by languages, history and race. We nurture the separatism in our states, our cities, our lanes and in our hearts. We talk about kings, Nababs, Zagirdars and Zamindars.

Current democratic India is a ticking time bomb of population explosion, changed demography, hunger-water shortage, civil wars and chronic capitalism.

History is bunk! Burn all the history books. Boycott the elections- we do not want all these democratic farce & shams under which we suffered since independence! If we look into the future, it looks bleak. We need to face the future and change it today.

What India needs is Dictator to have will power of changing the things with hard decisions. But such idea looks utopian today in our country. Dictator like Singapore PM Li Kuan, dictator like Stalin, dictator like Fidel Castro.

But as long as we live in the past it cannot be done. We need to change and forget our past and look towards future. If people strongly desire it, a leadership will automatically emerge.

Loksabha elections 2014 have shown the people's strong will. But as long as it is democratic frame work nothing will work, because democracy and market driven economy is not going to deliver to last man standing.

If we need real state which can deliver then we should change, Believe in future and be ready for sacrifice.
(15)

Thasin said:   10 years ago
I don't think India needs a dictator specifically, because to rule a country with massive population, democracy is the best. But the rules and qualification of ruling parties can be changed for the better development.

It is not necessary that an educated person should only come to the politics but the persons who comes forward for politics should be educated for proper political knowledge and can participate in election only if they are qualified.
(15)

KARAN BALAJI said:   1 decade ago
Hello guys I am karan dictatorship is actually horrible but it can be used in India to solve our economic problem by a selfless leader who should allow referendum process and if he got a non confidence vote he must be replaced. Of course we got a we got a lot of good dictators in our country. Our bharat mata helped to achieve what any country have not. I am sure dictatorship can be used in good way only for a particular term till our country become a developed country. Then again we can switch over to democracy.
(14)

Yuva Satya said:   1 decade ago
Yes India needs a dictatorship. Our society is a PUPPET in the hands of the so called political leaders, they run the society according to their requirements if it benefits them (their pockets) they just do it at the cost of even numerous lives. The anti social elements are not just the barricades for India's development but are the root cause for India to descend.

All this comes to an end only when there is a strong rule of a dictator. His instant and strict rules improve the law and regulations of the country.

I prefer for it and await for it to happen soon.
(13)

Abhimanyu said:   1 decade ago
Sisters and brothers of India, let me please make understand the importance of dictatorship and clear your conscience of influential impressions formed over decades of misleading facts provided by the subjugated intellectual authorities.

Considering the long history of India (some of it not recorded) India lost its importance and glory when it lost its brutality. The Indian civilization as we all know began and advanced well before any other known civilization. Hence as it is evident in the recent history that the more advancements and growth a country makes the less brutal it becomes and the more it comes under diplomatic foreign influences.

Therefore being established long before the Indian empire after completing its quota of (annexations, attack, division of kingdoms, establishment of dynasties, killings in the name of king) brutality, it became a stable militarily weakened and a moral and intellectual and peace loving empire. Taking advantage of this weakened brutality the foreign invaders ruled India for over 800 years. So after finally getting independence and recognition in 1947.

India should have re established its brutality and firmness to tackle the newly reformed world that is India needed a strong dictator to dictate terms instead of professing a new concept of democracy at that time.

Due to Indians lack of knowledge about the western idea of democracy India became a victim of unawareness and constituted a system of government divided on religious lines just to overcome its tendency to get exposed globally on how tough it was for India to sustain its diverse culture.

Hence I strongly believe that just one term of dictatorial or authoritarian government would have lifted India morally as well as economically as is the case of china. India would have been a more respected nation by the western world.
(13)

Abhi said:   1 decade ago
I think India don't need dictatorship India is a republic country and best as it is. If we let India rule under the dictators it will be the disrespect or slap on the face of our great freedom fighter who laid their today for our tomorrow and I cannot disrespect them.
(13)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.