Retirement Age for Politicians

I think all opinion is similar or partial from each other. Experience people must be significant role for our country. So we can't be restrict their age limit in politics, so I urge or recommend to you please if those person having more talent we are not cabiable to controversy them.

Yeah, somewhere I agree with that point that there must a certain age for retirement. Because generally, we see that our leaders are too much older they are not able to do their daily work but due to our system, they are indulging in politics. Politics is not only depended upon experience but also it depends upon energy, decision making power and last it must be able to handle that pressure. I think these things are the very important things to be a good leader and think if youth will come on that field then somewhere there is a possibility that they can do better. As far as experience is a concern it will come gradually, in this way somewhere we are able to bring youth in politics.

There should be the fixed retirement age for politicians i.e. 65 years. Why?

Because not only physically but also mentally a person is not that much creative or productive at an old age. May be few exception like Gandhi ji. But we are not short of the young population in India So, why should we give the burden of young population on old arms. As being a politicians is not an easy task. He has to take major decisions like signing deals, contracts, visiting other nations etc. All this thing require power, good health plus concentration. But at an old age we are not able to concentrate on any work most and most of the time we get health issue which tends to visit hospitals regularly and wasting time which should be given for the development of the nation. So we do not have any other option rather than fixing an age for the retirement. Even we can see for all other profession there is a fixed retirement age then why not for the politicians.

So our government have to think about our country and it has to think about people of our country by fixing an age for retirement of politician. On other thing that can be done they should be given another post like their valuable ideas and knowledge plus experience that should be utilised for the country.

To conclude I would like to say that we should be fixed an age for the retirement of the politicians this is good for them as well as our country. It can help for the development of our country so that young people can use innovative ideas for the the overall growth of people and our country.

According to my view,

A change is always welcome,

All government officials retire at 56 years in the state, while the public sector employees retire at 58 and the central government employees at 60 years.

"I feel the minimum age for contesting should be 30 years and the maximum age should be 75. In today's fast-paced life, a representative of the people should be able to move quickly and grasp things quickly".

If the politicians are Good and work then he can serve the nation till last movement.

Every firm, govt or pvt, fetches it's max potential output by replacing weak minds by energetic ones. It's only for the better running of the firm. Don't our country need a better running? So my opinion is to fix a retirement age for them too.

Good Evening Friends,

According to me, retirement age system also used for develop the country. Because even it will be prevent corruption. And other thing is youths may be come into the politics or other kind of people may be come.

So they may be change our country without problems. So opinions will be different. So changes will give for someone. So retirement age is also good one.

I think that have a fixed retirement age of desirable because better experience is not mistake to. Any design regard the country's development.

I think there should be a retirement age for politicians too. The age is debatable.

I think 65 is a good time for retirement.
Some people are saying that the more experienced the better.

Please note that "age" is not equal to experience.

If you think a person below 50 can't manage well, then you are not trusting yourself.
From age of 25 to 45, you have 20 years of experience, which is not less.
Think people think. Don't be afraid to take the responsibilities.
Gandhi ji started a revolution when he was below 40.

We need more young people like Gandhi.

- who are not afraid to question the "normal",
- who has the courage to stand up and speak.
- who has the dare to take decisions.

H! Guys,

I'm Vimal Sharma.

As we all know.

When our former president Mr. Apj Abdul Kalam was giving his speech. He had a heart attack. Therefore. There is no age limitation.

According to me, in this topic, Should not be politician age of retirement. Because as we all know that, every person has not keep leadership qualities.

Or to be a leader you must have a good experience new ideas n new technologies. And he has a creative mind.

And which keep AAP the qualities.

All this can be found the only experience.

So I considered that Should not be age limitation for a politician.

According to me, politician age doesn't matter.