Retirement Age for Politicians

Yes there should be an retirement age of politicians because the politicians after 60-70 age he/she is facing such a disease and gut health down day by day and the thinking problem also occur. This why every politicians have an retirement age.

Hi, I am Ravi.

In my point of view, the retirement of politician compulsory 60 to 65 years. Because this is the best time of retirement, the 60 to 65 before retirement time this age of people energy able and thinking deeply & taking the perfect decision. After this age of people week energy and come health problem.

So,

This is Yuvraj upadhyay,

I think that there should be the age of 70 after which a political leader should be retired as a social leader also had an social life in which they need some rest and if we just want them to work for us then they can do it but they will get health issues and can change into serious problems. So, my suggestion of retirement of politicians is after the age of 70.

Thanks.

Hi,

This is Dinesh.

According to me, the retirement of a politician should be fixed because after 60 years. The mind of people's be distracted and he had do thinking to improve the condition of India like an advisor so he does behave like a child so I want that it should be because they are not capable for this. "thank you'.

Hi, this is Samyuktha.

So, friends in my point of view, that the retirement age for politicians is the best idea to be implemented.

That means if the political leader becomes old then they are not having so much of energy to rule the system. And also they are eating so much of money by ruling the parties years and years.

The retirement age is applicable to all government officers like that it should also be applicable to the political leaders.

That means every political leader must have up to 50 years of age is enough not more than that. After the age of that, they lose their vision capability and energy and feeling some sickness as our political leader like that Chandra Babu Naidu.

So I am not opposing that all our political leaders are not like that based upon their own energy.

The youth leader will have so much of ideas than the old leader.

So I conclude that the government should take necessary steps to implement this retirement age system very soonly.

Definitely, the retirement age must be fixed for politicians when the retirement age is fixed for all other services, why not for them. And not more than one person from a family should be allowed to enter politics. These conditions should be there. The entire family enters politics and mainly to eat money. Within no time they become richest.

I think old politician more determined for work and country whether today's youth only wants to succeed in life. It does not matter how it gets.

I personally believe that older politicians have more experience and more knowledge of how this world works. They make much wiser decisions and above all, people tend to trust them instead of preferring a new, young politician.

Though young politicians would understand the current generation better but I think that age doesn't matter in any profession. If someone is good in what they do, then people do not see their age. Mr. Narendra Modi is 68 years old and he is still active with millions of supporters.

So, age is just a number and I don't think that the retirement age should be fixed.

To stop the usage of the politician's face as brand simple retirement age should be fixed. The court can increase retirement age if a person really good like Mr. Pon Manikavel.

In my point of view,

Yes! I agree with this point that retirement must be in politicians. Youth will get a chance to prove his capability.

People says that old is gold. Yes, I agree with this. Politics depend on experience but it does not only depend upon experience. But, it also depends upon energy.

So, I think. It's better to have a retirement age for the politicians.