Reservations in the Private Sector

According to me the definition of reservation system should be changed because it leads to several disputes in society and in colleges. It should be given on the basis of the economic condition of people and to the differently able people, not on the basis of the caste system. Because it leads to create a gap between higher caste people and lower caste people. Now it becomes a more political issue than for what it was implemented. Political parties create their vote bank through this.

Reservation leads to improper growth of the mindset of the people because in most cases a lower caste student study not so well because he thinks I will get the admission because he has some additional benefit provided by the government.

So for the uplifting of the mindset of people, government should amend the reservation system which is currently prevailing in the country.

Friends, reservation has become a big hurdle in our development. This is nothing but only gain politics of leader or some group. It has created discrimination in the name of caste, religion and geographical view. Private sector is a sector where growth and development is exponentially increased and the second point is it is basically gain oriented. If we will go with reservation in the private sector, we will miss a change for development and this sector also come in area of reservation politics and will create hurdle for any person to do business whether that person may belong to any specific caste, religion, or demographic al representative.

Yes, reservation should be there.

The base of reservation is not economic but socially, educationally backwardness. It clears the structure of hierarchy in the society which is so rigid that it can't be easily break even through economic status. So the purpose is clear to equalize the society.

Second, you can't compare two unequal things with the same parameters. So before for fair competition equal merit should be there and these merits or talent also require some amount of cultural capital which comes through an inheritance. So economic status can' t be appropriate parameter until this huge gap is not fulfilled.

It is not an overtake of 'meritorious' student, if they are really 'meritorious' they would be surely selected. Equality should be based on equal parameters, not one sided.

Since India is a democratic country therefore, there should be equality among all and through reservation equality is maintained in our country as it gives chance to backward classes. And according to our constitution we all have same fundamental rights and one of fundamental right is right against exploitation and since these classes are unaware of it then how will they fight against it? Then anyone can exploit them. So, reservation should be there.

According to me, yes this reservation can be help poor peoples in education study. But today's situation is that number of peoples which are rich they also take number of benefits of this reservation.

And its necessary that system can be changed now by knowing the property of that person who takes benefit of reservation. So that I think this will be held only poor peoples not a rich. So number of peoples which are lower or upper class they are in same competition.

I want to ask few questions to those who are advocating reservation. Will they send their child to a teacher who became teacher through reservation? Will they take service of an engineer for building their house who became engineer through reservation?

Will they go for treatment to doctor who became doctor through reservation? If answer to this question is yes then they are right. Otherwise they are simply fooling themselves.

I think reservation make everyone upset. Keep their step back for any opportunity they get as they think the first preference will be given to the one who have this reservation though they won't top in their exam. As India being the democratic it shouldn't be encouraged.

The people who have the reservation should be given the chance in other aspect but should not make the real talented guys to lose their opportunities. Thanks for sharing your wonderful time in reading my views.

Reservation is giving by government and private is need of backward classes but only for education not for job opportunity. Due to reservation backward classes people take education. Job has giving to talent people.

Article 17 of the Constitution abolished untouchability and punishes its practice. Hope, we are all implementing it in letter and spirit! If we add an Article 17A next to this in the Constitution to abolish caste and religious denominations; and punish practice of caste and religious denomination in any form (means practice of religion is OK, but not stratifying within religion) , there is no need for reservation. If it is argued that caste is found only in Hinduism, it is possible to assume caste is a religious-denomination.

Reservation for local nationals is being practiced globally, wherever migrant masses are large in number for employment. Even industries opened up by Indian businessmen abroad are bound to give quota for the national manpower.

Different parts of the world need different type of affirmative action. Reservation system evolved in India is relevant for its social setup. Real backward sections only should benefit out of it. Review should be periodical and embedded in the system.

Let's keep it simple:

--Reservations for the historically deprived class in education, central & state jobs is valid, as it's the very mandate & duty of theirs to improve their social upwardly & welfare.

--Reservations in private sectors is a disastrous proposition, since they're not obliged to do public service to which they already contribute a substantial part of their incomes as taxes for that very purpose & people elect governments to utilize those funds for the same.