India should go for the presidential form of democracy
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
107 comments Page 6 of 11.
Divya said:
9 years ago
Yes, India should go for presidential elections.
1) A right person should be put to power and it will help the actions to be implemented quickly. Parliamentary form consumes a lot of time.
2) If a developed country like the USA can progress further with the power concentrated in a single hand then why not ours.
3) Today the major problem in India is the formation of a coalition government. With no party in the absolute majority, no decision can be implemented as there is constant opposition from the other.
1) A right person should be put to power and it will help the actions to be implemented quickly. Parliamentary form consumes a lot of time.
2) If a developed country like the USA can progress further with the power concentrated in a single hand then why not ours.
3) Today the major problem in India is the formation of a coalition government. With no party in the absolute majority, no decision can be implemented as there is constant opposition from the other.
(15)
Siya said:
1 decade ago
I think India should go with parliamentary form of government. India with presidential form of government looks like as a school with principal and students only and not having teachers. As the principal can't teach the whole school alone in the same way a single person can't handle a country with such a big population. In our history, we have followed this type of government. Then why that form of government had been changed? Because presidential form of government doesn't work in our country.
(39)
Siva said:
1 decade ago
Hi friends,
I think parliamentary form of govt is the better for choose putting these large peoples problems into ones hands is not a right thing. One person can't be possible to go each and every individuals. So in my view at every cedar there must be one representative to see the peoples problems.
Even the option is in our hands to choose the correct leader. So that we can convey our problems those members easily. So I finally say that parliamentary form government is the best to choose.
I think parliamentary form of govt is the better for choose putting these large peoples problems into ones hands is not a right thing. One person can't be possible to go each and every individuals. So in my view at every cedar there must be one representative to see the peoples problems.
Even the option is in our hands to choose the correct leader. So that we can convey our problems those members easily. So I finally say that parliamentary form government is the best to choose.
(16)
Yogesh said:
9 years ago
Well, I think in India there are lots of crime, to control crime and implemented rules strictly, there must be a presidential government. You see in our country women not safe when anyone girl gets outside of her house, she is never safe on the way someone rapped with her and when that girl goes to the police station then to write complain, they get lots of time.
There are many things in India which seem that India must be.
Presidential government and about policies its must be change.
There are many things in India which seem that India must be.
Presidential government and about policies its must be change.
(12)
Manish said:
9 years ago
I don't think India should go for a presidential form because you can't leave a country with full of diversity in languages, castes, religions in one hand. Since it's not necessarily being a safe hand. But obviously, some major changes must be seen in our political system. As everything in the world changes according to time. During independence, our great leaders make some rule according to that scenario that is 100% correct, but we should think of yourself with time and changes.
(16)
Sasankmouli said:
1 decade ago
India should go for presidential democracy. The first thing is if an important decision should be made it should be taken immediately for the country but not discussing on it in stages for weeks and then passing it!.
Many decisions India took can be taken years ago ! But every decision is being sent to all 2 lok sabhas and are being dragged for years or months. If we follow this it would take decades for India to develop. In presidential democracy there won't be silly politics!
Many decisions India took can be taken years ago ! But every decision is being sent to all 2 lok sabhas and are being dragged for years or months. If we follow this it would take decades for India to develop. In presidential democracy there won't be silly politics!
(11)
Anu said:
1 decade ago
Hi friends,
It is necessary to have contact with people. So a single person cannot decide all the things for the benefit of our country. They must also get the opinion of the people. If we take a classroom a single person is in charge for the entire class for maintaining the class in good condition. Similarly a single person is chosen as president for maintaining the country in good condition by also consulting with public. So I prefer presidential governance is necessary.
It is necessary to have contact with people. So a single person cannot decide all the things for the benefit of our country. They must also get the opinion of the people. If we take a classroom a single person is in charge for the entire class for maintaining the class in good condition. Similarly a single person is chosen as president for maintaining the country in good condition by also consulting with public. So I prefer presidential governance is necessary.
(7)
Nayeem said:
9 years ago
I am respecting all of your views on whether India goes through presidential rule or not. I like the presidential rule but I can't expect more than a democratic rule. Presidential policies are most effective over crimes but do not function well. Take the example of America, crimes are going on faster than in India though yet it has the presidential policy. Crimes never can be stopped but we can tackle, thus, we should focus on the person who should have powers.
Thanks.
Thanks.
(15)
Saurav Prabhat said:
9 years ago
Yes, I do think that there should be a presedential form of government in India but at the same time, it is equally important that the man in power should be honest enough towards his works and decisions.
If it would be like that then I strongly believe that India will soon become a developed country. . Anyways, better than a developing country at least. The decision taken by a single mind by a good thinking and without any oppositions is always better.
If it would be like that then I strongly believe that India will soon become a developed country. . Anyways, better than a developing country at least. The decision taken by a single mind by a good thinking and without any oppositions is always better.
(10)
Isha Vyas said:
8 years ago
In my opinion, India should not jump on to presidential form because India has a wide number of population and to control so much population by only one person doesn't seem good and even may be because of this there would be many differences among people related to caste and religious system. And the most important thing is that now India has made up with parliamentary form and would definitely take a lot of time to get adjusted with presidential form.
(69)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers