India should go for the presidential form of democracy

Like My other friend's had described upper.

I wanted to tell you is that, I felt very awful when someone said that India is corrupted and it just because of blunt politician, but is that true because that politic member is chosen by us. So just don't blame those lone. Just go through their career graph, and see what he does for us in that year of span, judge them with their good work and if we feel like so then only choose the person and see the difference. I know that person surely will take our country on a top position and we feel proud. That we had selected a Right person.

Presidential democracy is best suited for a country like India. Usually in India the total power is distributed among a huge no of politicians. All the persons in a party may not be honest. If one among the party members done any mistake the whole party supports him as it would bring bad reputation to the whole party. Usually in India a politician spends a lot of money to win in an election its because he is confident when he gets the power he/she could loot the money. Whereas choosing a single honest person is easy then forming a government with a huge body of members.

No, its absently wrong to say that India should go with the presidential form of government since our country is one of of the largest democratic country in the world. And a single person will not be able to handle this huge population rather to have parliamentary form of government.

Basically in such a huge crowd there should be leader at each small level as in villages like Sarpanch and Mukhiya. If every higher office bearer people starts working for the poor and innocent people, then the day is no far when our country shall be counted in the recent developed one.

The current format is perfect for present scenario and so for the future. Our P.M. If works as P.M. of republic of India and people identify themselves as citizen then we will have a direct link with the followers and head of the institution. Considering the presidential form, powers in one hand will never be beneficial for the nation (if considered today's scenario) and what type of system the nation needs is already been written in the constitution. And will satisfying those who likes it and for those who thinks of change in the system, its a very long debate.

Hi friends,

We are all saying that "we are in a big democratic country" with very proud. But it is not really true. We are just sailing on the boat which is under the control of political parties rather than democracy.

If we have a chance to make the presidential form of governance, we will definitely work towards the growth of our nation. No one can put control on anybody.

Political parties are making rule which are favour for themselves only. A common man can't get anything.

So that I would like to support "INDIA SHOULD GO FOR PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT".

I don't think so India should go for presidential form of democracy because it is not possible with country like India as we know that India is 7th in term of land geography and 2nd in world for his population. So it's very difficult to implement it single person rule will be highly daunting task to handle 125 crore people.

I know that single rule doesn't mean one person rule there will more administrator like governor under president. But if this possible so our veteran who made our constitution they never included federal government in our constitution.

India has to have a presidential campaign because.

India is a vast country. We have a lot of states like Karnataka, Maharashtra and much more.

There may be a lot of parties to elect them and there is a fight amongst them to get votes.

And then, on the other hand, there is a presidential election where the people will get to decide.

And the power lies in his hand so that he or she can control the amount of black money.

That is why would like to conclude my speech that.

INDIA WILL HAVE A GOOD F ORM OF GOVERNMENT IF ITWAS PRESIDENTIAL.

Instead of changing the type of democracy in India, it's better that each and every individual should contribute in eradicating corruption from the system. This will require awareness among people and until and unless we will not demand for change none of the system can help solving the problem. Our constitution is the largest in the world and the best part is that there are provisions for amendments. So I'll suggest that please actively take part in the government forming policy because after all it's your own India.

Parliamentary govt is represented by the people of its people. It will not be different in case of presidential and if it will then it will be disastrous. So its wasting time in flogging dead horse. Better we make everyone aware his duties in every sphere of life.

So that we can elect a capable and determined soul for worshiping the deity of democracy which will ultimately lead to growth in every walk of life for every individual reside. But to expect loyalty from other we must read few lines by MAHATMA GANDHI.

I believe that presidential form governance is not possible in India. When we speak about India we are speaking about a country with different religions, languages and culture. Any political decision taken always tend to have religious or caste clashes.

Also it is not possible for a leader to speak in one language alone for e.g. in Hindi in our country. Because it angers people of non Hindi speaking stated. How can then a single person make decision? Practically speaking in India our modern system is the best.