India should go for the presidential form of democracy

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
107 comments Page 11 of 11.

Priyanka said:   9 years ago
No, India should not go for the Presidential form. India is diversify country in terms of religion, caste, language and geographically. The burden to deliberate, discuss and decide one candidate is huge and pain taking.
(3)

Adnan Tasli. said:   9 years ago
The powers must be in the hand of a prime minister who is directly elected and president must have his powers and he too must be elected directly.

So in our country, two rulers will rule and India will obtain success.
(7)

Yogesh said:   9 years ago
No I don't support at all our nation is large and there are many states and each states has its own uniqueness whether in term of language or cultural. So it not very easy to take decision that benefits the country.
(5)

Varun Goyal said:   7 years ago
No. Because we have created this alternative parliamentary form of Government only to get rid of the Kings. Hero worshipping should be shunned.

Hate it or love it, this is the true form of Democracy.
(35)

Ramakrishna Akula said:   10 years ago
India should have direct democracy so that people can decide and not politicians. This is very important as the there is difference between commitment and output of political winners.
(7)

Joy Mitra said:   7 years ago
Immediately India must be governed by Presidential System, otherwise, too many fatal troubles are nastily waiting for Mr Narendra Modi, BJP and whole India.
(19)

Cheryl said:   9 years ago
Yes, definitely India should go for a presidential form of government.
(31)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.