India should go for the presidential form of democracy

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
107 comments Page 10 of 11.

Akshat said:   1 decade ago
Guys according to me one leader is not enough to handle the whole affairs of the country. Though there is a kind of instability in the present form of government but how can we say that after all the affairs of our our country is given in the hands of that 1 person will he be able to manage the country affairs?
(6)

Vijay mandal said:   1 decade ago
No, I do not Support the statement that India should go for the presidential form of democracy, India has a vast population and reside different types of culture and religion. So, power of one person in whole country could not fulfill the understanding Of that particular situation without local MLA & MP.
(18)

Pranali said:   1 decade ago
We have eradicated presidential system many decades ago so why to bring it again. Presidential system may again bring to dictatorship in addition to corruption. One person cannot handle such a diverse country.

So rather than changing the system, people should should change their attitude towards country.
(17)

GANESH said:   1 decade ago
Yes, it would save a lot of time and money. Reason our democracy is distributed and for this distributed democracy we require more money and time. If we follow presidential government i.e. centralized government. Automatically it will reduce expenditure on election and will save a lot of money.
(5)

Divya Sharma said:   1 decade ago
I think democratic form of government is much better than presidential form. Its simply because of the reason why to put all the eggs in a single basket. Why not distributed in different different baskets. So even if one basket falls down the others are there to tackle and do the alternatives.
(10)

Ankit pachori said:   1 decade ago
Yes it will be follow in India because regional party make government unstable and reduce the decision making power of government if president system will follow in India then decision making power of government will increase and a blackmailing which is done by regional party will be end.
(9)

G S N said:   1 decade ago
It does not really matter which form of democracy holds in India. The strength of our nation depends on the leaders who are elected. Instead of changing the system of democracy, it would be better if people stop being selfish and elect someone who would actually work for the country.
(11)

Kam said:   1 decade ago
Hi friends.

I think presidential type of government is good for our country, in presidential democracy at least alliance system is not exist. Alliance system is very dangerous for our country. In presidential system only one person is taking all the decision. Which is good.
(4)

Sumit Sontakke said:   1 decade ago
I respects all the point mentioned above but No, I don't feel that India should accept the "Presidential form of democracy ".

We all should create awareness between the people and proper guidance about how a government should be rather setting a new democracy.
(4)

Neil said:   10 years ago
I agree with your point, but our country is a developing national we need strength and support for the development of the country. We can adopt presidential system we can trust the candidate and elect the right person in order for the betterment of the country.
(4)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.