India should go for the presidential form of democracy
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
107 comments Page 7 of 11.
Bhagyashree said:
1 decade ago
I would say a parliamentary type government should prevail in India. Unlike other countries our county is a democratic country, we have been given rights to elect the most suitable person to be a leader in respective states. So its us who can elect a more suitable person who can bring a change in our country. Election should not be biased with caste, religion or any other aspect. The chosen leader should act towards the well being of the country.
(8)
Manik said:
1 decade ago
Greeting to all friend as our India is a country of different culture, religion, language, etc we all together are staying happy and freely because of democracy if the all powers will transfer to single individual the there will not be possible to make all equally satisfied there may be chance that the single one will give priority to that group which belong to his or her so according to me presidential system in India will not be fruitful.
(10)
Sai kiran said:
1 decade ago
In my view, Parliamentary form of government is best for INDIA. Because, each and every citizen of INDIA has right to vote. But, we are misusing it by voting to persons who belong to our caste or religion and we are not thinking whether they are good candidates or criminals. So, instead of changing the form of government to presidential form, It's better to change our mind and every citizen should know his responsibilities and rights.
(62)
Mohit Soni said:
1 decade ago
Hello friends.
I think parliamentary system is good for our country, because all powers in a single hand may give rise to misuse of powers. People at their level elect their representative like at village level - sarpanch and in cities - MLA, these representative hear the problems of people and provide solution to them. A single person can't hear problems of population of 125 million people. Team work make democracy more better.
I think parliamentary system is good for our country, because all powers in a single hand may give rise to misuse of powers. People at their level elect their representative like at village level - sarpanch and in cities - MLA, these representative hear the problems of people and provide solution to them. A single person can't hear problems of population of 125 million people. Team work make democracy more better.
(45)
Pranshu Mishra said:
9 years ago
Yes, it should be because the Presidential System will reforms stable government for a long term, and while taking decision its consume less time as well as the majority will be supported.
Because of Democracy, taking a decision it takes too many thoughts and reviews. It's right but decision are taken only for parties faith, not for the nation.
So, parties should be demolished and one party one rule should be established.
Because of Democracy, taking a decision it takes too many thoughts and reviews. It's right but decision are taken only for parties faith, not for the nation.
So, parties should be demolished and one party one rule should be established.
(24)
Satya said:
9 years ago
The form of government is not the case here. The problem is our politicians. It doesn't require educational or a character to b a leader here but muscle power and money. So when you don't have the good list of politicians, any form of government would be showing the same results as of now. What requires the most is literacy. Unless people don't understand their rights no form of government would be successful here.
Thanks.
Thanks.
(14)
Chaitali Bauri said:
2 years ago
India should go for a presidential form of Government Our India is a democracy and people have to rights for vote there starting problem nowadays most of the political leaders showing their bad side before the election and force them to give a vote to their party so in this situation people have fear of lost life so they give vote unwillingly. If there would have a presidential form Govt there is less chance of corruption.
(9)
Amish Shah said:
10 years ago
It is said that Democracy is of the people, for the people, by the people. The word 'people' has been replaced by the politicians. Presidential system may be an alternate to get rid off from the current facing problems. I think now the times have to be come to see some changes in current political system so there are many alternate to change the existing system but we are taking alternate as parliamentary system.
(6)
Lin John said:
10 years ago
India should go for the presidential model. It is not a one man rule we can also elect the governor of each state and mall's as well. So you still have the checks and the same time matters of national importance can be taken care of one man who has been elected by the people directly.
At the state level a directly elected governor can be in charge of the state. Coalition pressures are also not there.
At the state level a directly elected governor can be in charge of the state. Coalition pressures are also not there.
(21)
Sru said:
1 decade ago
No, in my point of view India should not go for presidential system. As India is a democratic country we are known for our parliamentary government. This is a unique, so we should not let it go. Also always one person cannot think broadly. Sometimes he/she has to pay for decisions. Rules should be modified not changed. We can solve this problem by selecting appropriate government.
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU.
(10)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers