Food Comes First, Ethics Later
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
127 comments Page 12 of 13.
Padma said:
2 decades ago
This statement is really a true one because we can't survive without food. Ethics is also important for human life but until or unless we need food to follow our ethics.
(3)
Vasanth said:
2 decades ago
In yearly ages like stone age man searched for food first. Then he started to develop his civilization like clothes shellter and all those things so food is first for my opinion.
(3)
Mrinmaya said:
1 decade ago
Hi, friends it is not very easy to say weather food comes first or ethics. Sometimes such a situation arises in front of us that we can not give up our ethics for the sake of our belly. We commonly hear that leaders are starving for the demand to be fulfilled, why they do so, there is no personal cause only for the betterment of society. So, in this case we can say ethics first, food later.
(3)
Mukesh Kumar said:
1 decade ago
We are discussing about what we will opt when comes to food or ethics, if we give priority to food that means we may compromise with our principles that may led to become habitual of opting things on the basis of only fullfilling our requrements and inshort, gradually it may total degradation of the humanity. I think we are discussing it so that we can apply it on our real time scenario otherwise our view will be futile so I want to suggest people to think twice that where are you getting your food if it will unethical then I know most of us will choose to be hungry. In our real time scenario food willl be easily avalable to at least survive but whena comes to ethical issue I think it is our assets which we are continously collecting through our whole life journey and believe me it really MATTERS, so never compromise.
(3)
Shiv said:
1 decade ago
Hii friends.
According to my opinion foods comes first then Ethics. Because food is the basic need of a human being. If we don't follow the ethics then we can live longer but if we don't take food then we can't live more than 15 days.
We can see the effect of Food on people who lives in slum areas and who has not sufficient money to fill their stomach twice a day.
These people don't think that we are bothering something they start to walk in wrong ways like to murder someone.
It all happens to fulfill their stomach or to get money.
So we can say that a person doesn't think about ethics when he is hungry.
According to my opinion foods comes first then Ethics. Because food is the basic need of a human being. If we don't follow the ethics then we can live longer but if we don't take food then we can't live more than 15 days.
We can see the effect of Food on people who lives in slum areas and who has not sufficient money to fill their stomach twice a day.
These people don't think that we are bothering something they start to walk in wrong ways like to murder someone.
It all happens to fulfill their stomach or to get money.
So we can say that a person doesn't think about ethics when he is hungry.
(3)
Ani said:
2 decades ago
Ethics are the most precious to us to live as good citizen in the society.if you follow the ethics then you can recognized by the persons which are living in the society or from our our family members also.
(2)
Jamila said:
2 decades ago
Its true that food comes first , ethics later.
After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.
After satisfying the basic necessity of life only one can be ethical.
(2)
@tul verma said:
1 decade ago
All the person who are in the side of food, I would like to make you remember, that all the alive being instead human, he lives for other need, and without this philosophy, there is no existence of life and society. Food is necessary but we can never survive without ethics, eg. terrorism is not a concrete problem, it is a thought, we can't solve it by capital punishment.
(2)
Ankit said:
1 decade ago
yes i agree with all but food come first because it the basic requirement of the human being but is ethics is secondary thing in the life of human being ,it is also necessary in the today's world for com-petting with other's.SO,the conclusion is based that food is primary necessary of any human being to live and ethics is the secondary item to earn the money and get food for the family,cliges etc
(2)
Ankush said:
1 decade ago
We should keep balance between food and ethics as much as we could do but if we are being strict on the topic I personally believe that food should come first because that is basic need. Survival is right of every human being. You can talk about ethics when your stomach is filled.
(2)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers