Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

I am against, the economic growth is more important than ecological protection. Because, if we are not able to protect our environment, living beings and all, then how we will able talk about economic growth. Protection our ecological environment is the very serious topic and we can't take it lightly, we are not able to see that we are fully dependent on nature whether for breath or for resources if we aren't able to protect our environment then we will not able to uphold our life for too long.

For a country, economic growth should be the priority but it should not come above its natural vegetation, the growth we achieve by degrading our ecological life is actually a threat to that country.

If economic growth and ecological protection go hand in hand then only we are eligible to talk about growth, nothing is more important than our environment.

Save our Environment!

Thank You.

Hello everyone!

I would like to say that an economy should grow to keep in mind the ecological protection. If an economy grows ignoring the ecology that will lead to an imbalance in the environment which means unhealthy lifestyle, inefficient humans that means inefficient workforce resulting in unsatisfying growth of the economy.

If a nation grows economically but its ecology is degrading day by day then economic growth is of no use.

At the end, I would like to conclude it as economic growth and ecological growth should go together.

Hello everyone,

In my point of view, ecological growth is more important than economic growth because most of the resource we are getting only from nature. Ex: water, air, mine etc. Nowadays the power generation units are using water & air as the main resource without these the companies cannot produce electricity and these resources mainly depend on nature. The main thing is we are breathing only because of nature if we want to grow economically we need to alive first. So, my conclusion is Economic growth is completely depends on ecological growth.

Hello Everyone,

In my views, ecological protection is more important than economic growth. What I feel is that there will be no longer economical growth if there is no ecological protection after some years. It's just that we all are here for giving interviews so that we will be an asset for a company and we will increase the production of a company which will raise its economy. Frankly speaking surely we all mostly focus to have more income, but when we analyse the main scenario of production we would see that most of the big industries are based on agriculture and natural resources on a root level. So if there will be no sustainable development then there will be an imbalance between the economic as well as ecological development which will hamper the whole economic growth because after 15 to 20 years there will be no natural resources left for any economical growth.

Hello everyone,

As per me, we cannot decide the preference between ecological and economical growth, as both presume to be equivalently important.

Let also not forget that we all have come here as candidates for the job interview, i.e., we all are here to earn money, and why? Because we all want our economical growth. If we will individually grow economically then only the country will grow its economy.

And only a well economically grown country will be able to protect its ecology to the fullest.

So without economy there is no use of the protected ecology alone as it will also have necessities which need economy to grow.

Also, everyone must have come here with a vehicle releasing harmfull pollutants which had already disturbed the ecology, and all this just to grow our own economy.

So clearly, no one here is preferring ecological protection over economical growth.

Hello everyone,

According to me, ecological protection should be preferred first because economic growth is based on ecological sustenance. Ecology is the ultimate source for all the raw materials required for economic growth. Economic growth is for your greed and comfortability but ecological protection will give you life to live.

Be human, first, think about nature, our nurturing mother!

According to me, the ecological factor is more important than economical factor if a one country facing a problem ecologically than how it can be developed economically.

In my opinion, without the ecological protection, an economy cannot survive. If we build large buildings, industries etc. A flood or earthquake can destroy it all. If the country aquired ecological stability and harvest our nature in a proper way it will be beneficial to economy also. I believe without ecology economy can't survive.

I am in favour of this topic talking about our nation although we need to emphasis on economic growth of our country as we all know our growth lies in the growth of the nation. What we called up development which includes economic growth, the rise in employment, development of transportation means and systems, rising and improvement in globalisation sector. I would like to add we all should cooperate with government to develop these sectors but in a systematic manner as well within some ecological boundary so that our upcoming generation get a well-managed system, for instance, I like to give an example we must ensure to do double or triple plantation in response to deforestation, should keep our surroundings full of greenery.

At last, I would like to conclude by saying e6conomical development is good until it has some ecological boundary.

I think economic growth as well as ecological protection are the most important thing but ecological protection is much more important than economic growth. I believed that ecological protection will automatically return greater heights of economic growth. If environment system well our economic growth will automatically increase.