Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
238 comments Page 4 of 24.

Arunav Baruah said:   3 years ago
Good morning friends. I would like to put my observations with a practical approach.

Both Ecology and Economy are equally important to mankind and we can not choose one above the other. First, we must understand that the global population is increasing every day and to meet sustainably and remove poverty, extreme hunger etc. Economic growth is important through industrialization for producing more food, roads and bridges, modes of safe and rapid transportation, health and hygiene, etc. While this is a priority, we can not cause ecological damage. So attention must be there to encourage green technology which includes solar, wind hydel, etc. for the generation of power to run the wheels of the industries; use of clean fuel like electricity from green sources, hydrogen fuel cells, biofuels, etc for transport mobilities. To promote recycling of waste, proper effluent treatment, and water harvesting methodologies in urban areas/cities. To increase dependency on agro-based industries for mass production of food and sustainability of livelihoods. To promote afforestation, prevent rampant fishing and recycling of plastic wastes etc.

IF we follow the mantra of Refuse- Reuse -Recycle and focus on green technology, both ecological protection and economic growth can be addressed simultaneously and make our life comfortable and sustainable along with mother nature.
(12)

Poli Naidu Sabba said:   3 years ago
Economic growth cannot be accomplished if someone neglects to protect the climate. Climatic change is a serious concern these days leading slow down of the nation's Economic growth.
(4)

Tejaswani Yeturi said:   3 years ago
The topic is economic growth is more important than ecological protection.

In my point of view, ecological protection is more important than economic growth. Nowadays people are concentrating on earning. But not on the protection of the environment. Once we destroy it we cannot rebuild it. So in spite of earnings concentrate on ecological protection. If we balance both then it would be perfect for every individual life.
(21)

Gulshan Kumar said:   3 years ago
I think that both have their own individual importance but if we go with the preference from my side it would be ecological is the first one because if we save our ecological system it makes us healthier and health is important and without it, il money is nothing because we have seen many cases who have too much wealth but after getting hold by a hazardous disease like cancer, the money will matter but if the cause behind the cancer is ecological balance.

So, Go with the ecological system and we are good to manage both things on one platform.
(16)

Chaitali Bauri said:   3 years ago
Here the topic is -"economics growth is more important than ecological protection ".

In my opinion, we have to balance both equally because if we want good health then we should have a good environment as well as money for survival. And there is many options to earn money from nature some of examples are-we can earn money by selling fruits, selling verbal leaf it may helps make medicines etc.

So, if we follow this way I think both are equally going and people will get comfort zone from economics and ecologically. That's all.
(19)

Akash singh said:   3 years ago
Our topic is "ECONOMIC GROWTH IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION".

In my opinion, our first preference must be nature, not wealth. Because once nature is destroyed it will never rebuild but wealth we can earn or make again and again. Nature and the environment are divine and precious things. so rather than destroying them, we should keep them safe. Because they are giving life to us without nature we can not imagine human life. Because all things which we are feeding and taking are connected directly or indirectly to the environment. So, ecological protection is more important than economic growth. But if we are able to find out some middle route so we can balance both of these that will be the cherry in the cake.
(16)

Gilbert pardon said:   4 years ago
Yes, the Environment is more important for it serves life and has all we can utilise to support the growth of the economy.
(6)

Roy said:   5 years ago
Hello friends, today, the topic is about Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection. We can't ignore the Ecological growth. Since global warming threatens our future, we should be aware of Ecological protection.
(22)

Abu Shaiban said:   5 years ago
Hello everyone,

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to share my views on this topic, economic growth is more important than ecological protection.

Well, My opinion is totally different because we all are aware of the climate change that the world is facing today. We are evolving from nature. A healthy environment led to the development of a healthy mind. A good healthy environment will lead to good economic growth. If we go against nature for the development of industry, road networks, it will be reverse consequences on the life of humans in the form of disaster.

There should be a balance approach between economic growth and ecological protection.
(61)

Abhishek yadav said:   6 years ago
Hello,

The statement is fully opposite of my view.

We have all evolved from ecology and if we have a good environment our health will be also good and a good body has a better mind.

Thinking of just economic growth is non other than stupidness if we have good ecological nature then we will automatically have good economy so firstly ecology should be given preference not economy.
(34)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.