Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
231 comments Page 13 of 24.

Rahul said:   8 years ago
Hello,

The very first thing that we have to understand is that the earth is not only for us the upcoming generations also has to live here with happiness. So, its our duty to give the earth to then with the same beauty as how we have received.

It is an unfortunate fact that our generation has made the earth deteriorate this much. The main reason for this is the technological explosion which led to the over exploitation of natural resources.

Competition between countries which had made each of them to assess their quality on the basis of the economic parameters has made them give less importance to the ecosystem.

Finally the only solution that we can suggest is to use some perennial sources of energy and to reduce the use of perishable ones.

Thank you `
(12)

Sai prudhvi raj said:   8 years ago
Hello everyone,

Of course, economic growth important even ecological protection but according me it is competitive world each and every human life is not less than a marathon to survive in these competitive world and to compete with the super power nations we don't have an another choice we should destroy nature, of course, no human has right to destroy nature but what we can do our nation has a lot issues from our neighbour countries to face them our economic growth is more important and India is young India where people have lot of dreams to live life like king size based on these conditions like opportunities, technology, threats from neighbour countries economic growth is important means mandatory my conclusion economic growth is important to with little loss in nature because with out economic growth we can't survive in this world as a human even as a country.
(12)

SIDDHANT GARG said:   8 years ago
We can't forget the ecological protection while economic growth. Because both are important not one is more than other ones.

Both are essential for our country because if health would be good so economic structure automatically grows with fresh young minds.

And health will be good when the ecological situation is good for our country.
(13)

Supriya said:   8 years ago
In my point of view, I support for both ecology and economy, because we can't have the right to destroy the ecology it's not created by us. Coming to economy India to be an developed country their should need economy. So it's in our hands to balance ecology and then economy too. If we protect our environment then their will be no need to waste our money for the hospitals. Our motherland and we have the right to protect it and encourage others to do So.
(58)

Shubham Sameer said:   8 years ago
According to me.

Ecological protection is as much as important as Economic growth. Every one in world is as much as worried about enoviramental protection as economy. Every country is taking major steps to recover their environmental damages that has been done by them.

Because for few years or decade or century, you can worry about your economy but there will be hazards due to environmental pollution. Only one thing can save you from this is your initial steps that has been taken by you in past years or decades or century.

We know we can see the results of our work in economic growth in just few years. But ecological protection takes time to get covered.

Let's take one example of Beijing (China's capital) , it had the worst condition than our delhi in terms of pollution. So they taken various major steps to encounter the condition.

In our India everyone say that world is talking about our economy but they are also talking about our delhi condition. Why invanka Trump was not been in Delhi because of The damn pollution. It was the shame for us that srilankan player had put mask on their face due to pollution. It was the world shame for us.

And what you see that still government is blaming punjab, haryana for the pollution and central government is blaming the delhi government.

And mark my words if condition will not change soon we have to shift our capital some where else.

So for my opinion Economic growth is not more important than Ecological protection. Both have equal importance.
(29)

Mithun said:   8 years ago
Every nation's strength lies on its human resources and if youths are more it will double the strength.

In this world, only human having consciousness, whatever may the development in technology, unless until it doesn't have consciousness in broader sense knowledge of dharma it is useless. As we are getting frequent news of robot and its applications. Many big factories using robots for industrial purposes, as a result, they are getting more outputs also, at the same we are getting the tragic story of robots malfunctioning. Single command mistake gives the big tragic story. This because the robot doesn't have consciousness. Every country having various activities from sweeper to general manager works. Every area is important, we can't imagine a society without a sweeper.
(2)

Amit said:   8 years ago
Yes, economic growth is important for a country but it's not important than ecological protection, we have the example of Delhi, we all know the situation of Delhi's air pollution its PM level is above 200 but for ideal conditions, it should not more than 2.5. It is the worst condition for human beings. It is the high time to open our eyes and should take the steps to protect our environment if we don't it will be too late and soon we will destroy our environment. Recently Stephen Hawking also said that people should leave the earth in next 100 years.
(11)

Aiswarya said:   8 years ago
Hai, according to me, economic growth is very important for a country but not more than the ecological protection. The country must give more important to the ecological protection. Economic growth should be sustainable ecologically in a way that living conditions and resource-use meet human needs without undermining the sustainability of natural systems and the environment, so that future generations may also have their needs met.
(3)

Souvikkumarpal said:   8 years ago
Hello everyone,

According to me, Although economic growth is important but ecological protection is to be preferred first rather than economic growth. Because our actual growth of economy comes from ecology. It is good that our country is under development process. There are several constructions happening in different sides, increasing transport system etc for more economic growth. But most of them are created by destroying trees or forest. I do not agree with this type of decision taken by the government. Because we increase our economic growth by harming the nature. We do not care about it. As a we are facing a different kind of disaster and global warming is an alarming situation for us that indicate our less attention to nature's component. Carbon-di-oxide also increases due to deforestation. Most of the people are suffering from several symptoms or diseases.

Now my point is, what will be the need for economic growth if we fail to protect ecology. Because most of the material is used to making an economic growth, come from natural resources. If we can't survive in nature then there will be no necessity of economic growth. There are several ways to develop our growth without hampering a nature like we can use biogas instead of using petrol, wind power and solar power for electricity etc.

So my conclusion is that we should be protecting our nature besides developing our economic growth.
(51)

Anjali said:   8 years ago
In my view ecological protection is more important then economic growth because if we protect economic then we naturally obtained many raw product which are use to increases economic growth.
(9)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.