Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
237 comments Page 11 of 24.

Jitender said:   9 years ago
Good Morning to all of you.

Acc to my points, Ecological protection is much important then economic growth, As economic growth is increse the capacity of economic to produce goods and services and measures by GDP and GNP this increasse our economic growth but we all know if we work on increase economic condition rather than ecology protection, so it will harm our environment and causes hazardess condition and reiuned our resources, So guys its our duty to protect our environment rather then improve economic growth.

As we earn money and spend and again we earn as a repeated cycle, but if our natural resources finished there is no source to recycle or recover. So its our duty to save natural resources because this is very benifical for our genration as well as future generation so use in a very helpful manner.

At last, I would like to say that Ecological growth is more important for us So prevent it and use it according to their requirements because economic growth can be improve automatically as we save our ecological resources.

I would also suggest you some tips to prevent our ecological environment.

1. Plant more and more trees.
2. Reduce Deforestation.
3. Use Ecofriendly system.
4. Use 3 are system.

Thank you so much guys.
(23)

Trisha said:   9 years ago
Hello everyone.

Both economic growth and ecological protection is important. We should follow sustainable. Development that means development of country without harming the environment.

Economic growth is important of any developed countries. It creates employment and growth of country. But ecological protection should be alse taken in mind. It should be balanced.

Due to rapid economic development like good infrastructure, road, building etc we are cutting lot of trees & this cause global warming. Due to disbalance of ecosystem we are suffering from unexpected climatic change, lack of drinking water.

So we should use limited resources carefully. Also we can use hydro, solar, geothermal, wind energy to form power. Government can create awareness among people to grow more plants and save planet Earth. People can also use rain water harvesting techniques and plant more trees. It's not only governments responsibility to protect ecology but every individual can contribute to save planet Earth.
(17)

Rohit Patidar said:   9 years ago
Economic growth is not more important than ecological protection. This environment is the everything we need to live. Money is made by human we can recreate it anytime in the very period. But the environment is not created by a human it is like fossil fuel once it has gone it cannot be replaced. We can create money but we can't create an environment so killing or damaging environment for economic growth is not a good idea. But both can take place simultaneously.
(36)

Rishabh gupta said:   9 years ago
Economic growth is important but not more than ecological protection. No doubt it is very important for any country to grow economically but not at the cost of sacrificing with its ecology. That's why various developed nations of the world follow the concept of "Sustainable Development" which means development should take place without harming the environment. I think the economic growth rate will accelerate at a much faster pace if the country knows how to effectively use its stock of limited resources.
(17)

Aniruddha Roy said:   9 years ago
Ecology is directly related to our health and surroundings whereas economy is related to our accessibility to our needs. To make and see our economy grow, we need to live healthy. Again economic growth is related to industry whereas industry gives both nectre in terms of money and employment and poison in terms of excessive pollution disturbing the nature and hence living beings health. So, I don't think economic growth can, by any means, be more important than ecological protection. Economic growth is also possible while not impacting our eceology. Eg utilisation of solar energy saves lot of resources thereby employing more people in development of solar products and hence developing the economy.
(14)

Madhavi Kulkarni said:   9 years ago
Hello everyone. I agree with your point of view, According to me, both economy and ecology play an important role in the development of the country. If you have a proper ecology only you will have a positive energy that will help you gain energy and work for the economic growth of the country. Ecology gives us positive energy to work. We don't have any right to neglect the ecology of economic growth. We should balance both economy and ecology that will only help us lead our future happily and effectively.
(15)

Aishwarya said:   9 years ago
Yes, economic protection is important than ecological protection. Our country economic growth is must. My economic growth we can maintain and manage our ecological growth. Nature is very important to all of us. By improving our economic status, we can improve and maintain our nature. Because money is more important to manage nature. So improving economic growth we can improve our ecological growth.
(8)

Anjali said:   9 years ago
In my view ecological protection is more important then economic growth because if we protect economic then we naturally obtained many raw product which are use to increases economic growth.
(9)

Souvikkumarpal said:   9 years ago
Hello everyone,

According to me, Although economic growth is important but ecological protection is to be preferred first rather than economic growth. Because our actual growth of economy comes from ecology. It is good that our country is under development process. There are several constructions happening in different sides, increasing transport system etc for more economic growth. But most of them are created by destroying trees or forest. I do not agree with this type of decision taken by the government. Because we increase our economic growth by harming the nature. We do not care about it. As a we are facing a different kind of disaster and global warming is an alarming situation for us that indicate our less attention to nature's component. Carbon-di-oxide also increases due to deforestation. Most of the people are suffering from several symptoms or diseases.

Now my point is, what will be the need for economic growth if we fail to protect ecology. Because most of the material is used to making an economic growth, come from natural resources. If we can't survive in nature then there will be no necessity of economic growth. There are several ways to develop our growth without hampering a nature like we can use biogas instead of using petrol, wind power and solar power for electricity etc.

So my conclusion is that we should be protecting our nature besides developing our economic growth.
(51)

Aiswarya said:   9 years ago
Hai, according to me, economic growth is very important for a country but not more than the ecological protection. The country must give more important to the ecological protection. Economic growth should be sustainable ecologically in a way that living conditions and resource-use meet human needs without undermining the sustainability of natural systems and the environment, so that future generations may also have their needs met.
(3)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.