Verbal Reasoning - Syllogism - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Syllogism - Syllogism 1 (Q.No. 3)
Directions to Solve

In each of the following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions numbered (1) and (2). You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Give answer:

  • (A) If only (1) conclusion follows
  • (B) If only (2) conclusion follows
  • (C) If either (1) or (2) follows
  • (D) If neither (1) nor (2) follows and
  • (E) If both (1) and (2) follow.

3.

Statements: Some mangoes are yellow. Some tixo are mangoes.

Conclusions:

  1. Some mangoes are green.
  2. Tixo is a yellow.

Only (1) conclusion follows
Only (2) conclusion follows
Either (1) or (2) follows
Neither (1) nor (2) follows
Both (1) and (2) follow
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Discussion:
51 comments Page 1 of 6.

Tapan said:   1 decade ago
Option (b) follows on observing figure 2, please explain.

Veena said:   1 decade ago
The condition should be satisfied on both diagram.

Vikash kumar said:   1 decade ago
Some mangoes may be green.

What if this is written in conclusion. Please do me reply.

Sukanya said:   1 decade ago
I feel option b is the right answer.

Jubeca said:   1 decade ago
Tixo need not necessarily be yellow. As in t 2nd diagram only is it found to be intersecting with mangoes n yellow.

Also mangoes may be green. Tht ws my answer as well, but I guess we just have 2 relate our conclusion the question n not consider other facts.

Raj said:   1 decade ago
Mangos are green but here not mention. So how is D option.

Sneha said:   1 decade ago
Here is ans for this question. Just a simple logic.

Always "SOME+SOME" gives answer as = "Neither (i) nor (ii)".

Pushpendu said:   1 decade ago
Some+some is not always neither (i) nor (ii). Ya but most cases.

Ravinder kumar said:   1 decade ago
By RAVAL'S notation Statements are M -Y and T - M and conclusions are M - G and T- Y. G is not present in the statement so M -G does not follow.We cannot link T - Y through common linking term M because we can deduce conclusion only when if common linking term multiplies i.e is in double letters,divides i.e become single letter from double letter or is in double letters in both statements

Manoj kumar said:   1 decade ago
I had studied Raval's notation and now any syllogism problem is just as simple as ABC for me.


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.