Logical Reasoning - Statement and Conclusion - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Statement and Conclusion - Section 3 (Q.No. 23)
Directions to Solve

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

  • (A) If only conclusion I follows
  • (B) If only conclusion II follows
  • (C) If either I or II follows
  • (D) If neither I nor II follows and
  • (E) If both I and II follow.


23.

Statements: Today out of the world population of several thousand million, the majority of men have to live under governments which refuse them personal liberty and the right to dissent.

Conclusions:

  1. People are indifferent to personal liberty and the right to dissent.
  2. People desire personal liberty and the right to dissent.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Answer: Option
Explanation:
It is mentioned in the statement that most people are forced to live under Governments which refuse them personal liberty and the right to dissent. This means that they are not indifferent to these rights but have a desire for them. So, only II follows.
Discussion:
3 comments Page 1 of 1.

Petrut said:   3 years ago
I see it like this.

Government -> several disadvantages.

People need to live under it.

Do any of the people/ all people / do some people / do most people living there dread this particular disadvantage?

The statement reflects a disadvantage but not the vision of the people who endure it.

Correct me, If I'm wrong.

Jeffrey Catap said:   9 years ago
I do not know, but when we have "people" it is referring to the entirety and your explanation people = majority which is invalid.

David said:   1 decade ago
I don't see how you can choose B. There is nothing in this problem that even remotely suggests how these people feel about living like this. I feel like you're assuming that being forced means that they are opposed. Is it not possible that I could be forced, for example, to do the laundry, but I want to do the laundry anyway? It's the same thing in this problem. It is possible that while they're forced to live without liberty and dissent, they are opposed to the idea of having personal liberty and dissent?

Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.