Discussion :: Statement and Argument - Section 2 (Q.No.49)
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
- (A) If only argument I is strong
- (B) If only argument II is strong
- (C) If either I or II is strong
- (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
- (E) If both I and II are strong.
|Mavric said: (Jun 25, 2013)|
|None of the argument says shuffling of ministers is a regular process or not as given in the answer, 'proper working and implementation of schemes and avoiding corruption' is a healthy democratic process as given in argument 1.|
|Hitesh said: (Aug 15, 2013)|
|If we go by the statement given, council of ministers, their portfolio & time gap between elections is stressed upon. Argument 1 holds strong since it mentions about democratic process that should be followed during the time gap between elections. Argument 2 also holds strong since it mentions about ministers portfolio.
Both arguments somewhere relates to statement given.
Post your comments here:
Email : (optional)
» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.