Discussion :: Statement and Argument - Section 2 (Q.No.47)
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
- (A) If only argument I is strong
- (B) If only argument II is strong
- (C) If either I or II is strong
- (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
- (E) If both I and II are strong.
|Abinaya.A said: (May 3, 2014)|
|Our country have our own policies. The need arises only due to some problems. So, according to my point option D is correct.|
|Dave said: (Sep 25, 2015)|
|Like so many other explanations in this test, this is a moral statement not a logical deduction.
Argument I offers as a reason not to support all the international policies of the USA the predicate that many other powerful countries do not. If the statement is presumed to be correct then the example supports the conclusion "no". Thus it is a strong argument in answer to the question - whether it is an accurate answer is irrelevant.
Argument II is a strong argument because there is a binary choice of support for cash or no cash in the absence of support, and thus it supports the conclusion "yes". Assessment of the necessity or usefulness of the funds or some sort of nationalistic shame if funds are accepted is a completely separate matter.
|Assefa said: (Feb 3, 2017)|
|Good. Thanks @Dave.|
Post your comments here:
Email : (optional)
» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.