Logical Reasoning - Statement and Argument - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Statement and Argument - Section 2 (Q.No. 27)
Directions to Solve
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer:
- (A) If only argument I is strong
- (B) If only argument II is strong
- (C) If either I or II is strong
- (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
- (E) If both I and II are strong.
27.
Statement: Should the persons below the age of 18 years be allowed to join armed forces?
Arguments:
- No. Persons below the age of 18 do not attain both physical and mental maturity to shoulder such burden.
- Yes. This will help the country develop its armed forces which will serve the country for a longer time.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
The armed forces must consist of physically strong and mentally mature individuals to take care of defence properly. So, argument I holds strong. Clearly, argument II holds no relevance.
Discussion:
2 comments Page 1 of 1.
Reineke said:
8 years ago
I disagree with the explanation. Argument I merely states an opinion. People below 18 could be mentally and physically mature.
Argument II however makes a logical point. If people are younger at the age of joining they will be able to serve longer. That is a fact.
Therefore, in my opinion, only Argument II is strong.
Argument II however makes a logical point. If people are younger at the age of joining they will be able to serve longer. That is a fact.
Therefore, in my opinion, only Argument II is strong.
(1)
Yash said:
7 years ago
There must be a training camp for below 18 age to be strong enough. So, I think both are weak.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers