Logical Reasoning - Logical Deduction - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Logical Deduction - Section 1 (Q.No. 13)
Directions to Solve
In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer:
- (A) If only conclusion I follows
- (B) If only conclusion II follows
- (C) If either I or II follows
- (D) If neither I nor II follows and
- (E) If both I and II follow.
13.
Statements: No gentleman is poor. All gentlemen are rich.
Conclusions:
- No poor man is rich.
- No rich man is poor.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
The first premise is an E-type proposition, So, the middle term 'gentleman' forming the subject is distributed. The second premise is an A-type proposition. So, the middle term 'gentlemen' forming the subject is distributed. Since the middle term is distributed twice, the conclusion cannot be universal. Since one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. Thus, it follows that 'Some rich men are not poor'. Thus, neither I nor II follows.
Discussion:
22 comments Page 1 of 3.
Akash said:
1 decade ago
Which are major and minor premises?
Nishu said:
1 decade ago
How to solve these types of premises?
Can anybody help.
Can anybody help.
Brandon said:
1 decade ago
Shouldn't it be "All rich gentlemen are not poor"? Why is it "some"?
Anirban Das said:
1 decade ago
Answer should be [E] because both follows. There has to be a conclusion as the first premise is Universal Negative starting with "No" and the second premise is Universal Affirmative starting with "All".
Hence, UA + UN = UN or PN (No, Some not). [PN = Particular Negative]. Please advise.
Hence, UA + UN = UN or PN (No, Some not). [PN = Particular Negative]. Please advise.
Anurag said:
1 decade ago
@Brandon.
In this type take a example:
All kids are not present in class. Don't go by word::"all".
All kids are not present==>some are not present this I can say.
Definitely (that's why I am saying all are not present)/about rest I can't tell.
All and not combination is always====>some are not.
All mangoes are not good===>some are not good. About rest mangoes I can't tell.
In this type take a example:
All kids are not present in class. Don't go by word::"all".
All kids are not present==>some are not present this I can say.
Definitely (that's why I am saying all are not present)/about rest I can't tell.
All and not combination is always====>some are not.
All mangoes are not good===>some are not good. About rest mangoes I can't tell.
(1)
Shubhasri said:
1 decade ago
Can some one explain with venn diagram?
Prashant said:
1 decade ago
Correct conclusion should be "Some rich are not Poor" or "Some poor are not rich".
Mee said:
10 years ago
I don't understand. How can gentleman be distributed in both cases?
Sup said:
10 years ago
Please explain with a venn diagram as well. This particular one is quite confusing.
Divya goyal said:
10 years ago
I am confused. Can somebody help me to solve this type of questions?
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers