Logical Reasoning - Logical Deduction - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Logical Deduction - Section 1 (Q.No. 20)
Directions to Solve

In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Give answer:

  • (A) If only conclusion I follows
  • (B) If only conclusion II follows
  • (C) If either I or II follows
  • (D) If neither I nor II follows and
  • (E) If both I and II follow.


20.

Statements: All jungles are tigers. Some tigers are horses.

Conclusions:

  1. Some horses are jungles.
  2. No horse is jungle.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Since the middle term 'tigers' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, I and II involve only the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. So, either I or II follows.
Discussion:
25 comments Page 2 of 3.

Mamatha said:   9 years ago
Answer is D.

At least one common player should be positive.

Kushal Basu said:   9 years ago
I cannot understand. Please explain me.

Nikhil said:   9 years ago
I think the answer is D. It's not A.

Mohit said:   8 years ago
Answer should be A. Because Some tigers = Horses so, Some horses can be jungle.

Shubham said:   8 years ago
What's the right answer?

Dipesh said:   8 years ago
Since the middle term 'tigers' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, I and II involve only the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. So, either I or II follows.
(1)

Mohamed hassain said:   7 years ago
I can't understand this. Please explain me.

Mukesh said:   6 years ago
Please explain me the answer clearly.

Anonymous said:   6 years ago
Here we have used major and minor term, the predicate and the subject of the conclusion. They are part of the conclusion I and II and according to the rules of syllogism they form a complementary pair. Hence the option is correct.

Ayush said:   5 years ago
According to me, the answer is A.
(1)


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.