Women are not fit for Defense Services
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
159 comments Page 12 of 16.
Nikhil sukhwal said:
1 decade ago
Now I would like to note this that people are neglect the women power generally. But its not a good practice, I am giving a recent example of "GORILLA GANG" this is a gang of women those are trained in Dholpur forests or tribal areas just because to fight against the red tapism or naxalism. And this gang is commanded by women only and most important thing is no men is a part of this gang. Is this a women power. So we can't say that, women are not as stronger as men.
(39)
Jasemine said:
1 decade ago
I didn't read all the discussions but I want to say that I know there are many disadvantages and unsafe for women in the armed forces like sexual harassment's and much more. But then also I want to say that we women are not afraid of anything and we can challenge any flied because women are equal to the boys. My father is also a retired air force personal and he also support my views.
(29)
Himani said:
1 decade ago
I think women can play an important role in defense services. Our honourable prime minister has showed women power to the whole world on this republic day. America president Mr.Obama has appreciated it. It is proved already that women is not less than men in any field. We talk about equality, giving rights to women is not only the equality. It should actually happen in practical. Women can do everything, what a man can do. She is not made to be called as house wife. If she will be given proper training like men then she can also contribute in this field.
(48)
Rohit said:
1 decade ago
OK I think many are supporting that women should be included in Indian armed forces a very good examples are being put up but answer my few questions.
1) How many women martyrs have India seen in Indian army?
2) Why they are not send to dangerous area?
3) And there are many advantages they have during their training and transfer?
So be technical don't keep saying equality in all.
1) How many women martyrs have India seen in Indian army?
2) Why they are not send to dangerous area?
3) And there are many advantages they have during their training and transfer?
So be technical don't keep saying equality in all.
(22)
Dibyendu Saha said:
1 decade ago
To those who say women do not belong in armies/navies/air force because they lack the upper body strengthen ability to withstand pain, may I remind you a few points that we see in nature:
1. Females such as tigers, are the hunters.
2. Females go through immense pain while giving birth, which is not just during the time of giving birth but throughout a major portion of the 9 months.
Females are not as weak as you see them to be. I can even bet that a female like Mary Kom can take on any man here in this forum. With proper training, every man and woman gets stronger.
As for them being vulnerable to sexual torture if captured, that's probably, about the only reason why a woman would prefer not to be in the front-line in the army (not saying that there are none). There are many posts in the army as tactical support or navigational officers, etc that can suit their strengths fine. Also in the navy and air force they can take on any role a man can efficiently.
1. Females such as tigers, are the hunters.
2. Females go through immense pain while giving birth, which is not just during the time of giving birth but throughout a major portion of the 9 months.
Females are not as weak as you see them to be. I can even bet that a female like Mary Kom can take on any man here in this forum. With proper training, every man and woman gets stronger.
As for them being vulnerable to sexual torture if captured, that's probably, about the only reason why a woman would prefer not to be in the front-line in the army (not saying that there are none). There are many posts in the army as tactical support or navigational officers, etc that can suit their strengths fine. Also in the navy and air force they can take on any role a man can efficiently.
(41)
Shaikh. said:
1 decade ago
I'm a girl. To all those who say that we can't focus because of the fact we have to take care of a family and stuff, what if we don't have the need too? What if our family is fine with taking care of themselves and with the fact we don't want to marry? I play sports. A lot. And exceed most boys at it. I'm stronger than them too.
There are exceptions everywhere. Are we treated the same? Shouldn't there be a trial to see if the girl is worthy or not? Plus, why lower the difficulty level of the tasks? This is not the opportunity we're talking about. This is the safety of our country. If a woman can clear all of them, then what's the problem.
The rule makers haven't made everything clear. And if they have, I cannot find it. I have been searching the net since hours. Peace.
There are exceptions everywhere. Are we treated the same? Shouldn't there be a trial to see if the girl is worthy or not? Plus, why lower the difficulty level of the tasks? This is not the opportunity we're talking about. This is the safety of our country. If a woman can clear all of them, then what's the problem.
The rule makers haven't made everything clear. And if they have, I cannot find it. I have been searching the net since hours. Peace.
(38)
Pragnya prachurya acharya said:
1 decade ago
I do not think that women are not fit for army because women more stronger than men physically mentally but I agree that men are some time stronger than women because of their environment from childhood and the most important thing is their body design but if proper training is given to women they are better than men. Who think that women are not fit for solider post they are insulting women power.
At one side we are talking about women empowerment but women are not allow in infantry why so when all says better than men than why women are not allowed in infantry. In against some says family will not allow but they forget the logical thing that the women who want to join infantry they do not care for any body they are independent enough and are very brave so they want to join if our government is not allowing women in infantry then they have no right to say that women empowerment is going on.
I agree that women have some biological problems but every problem have its own solution. Hens I want to say that women should also get the chance to join infantry as soldiers.
At one side we are talking about women empowerment but women are not allow in infantry why so when all says better than men than why women are not allowed in infantry. In against some says family will not allow but they forget the logical thing that the women who want to join infantry they do not care for any body they are independent enough and are very brave so they want to join if our government is not allowing women in infantry then they have no right to say that women empowerment is going on.
I agree that women have some biological problems but every problem have its own solution. Hens I want to say that women should also get the chance to join infantry as soldiers.
(32)
Vini said:
1 decade ago
Women are fit, they can do any job some times better than many. But the problem lies with the family. Many families will not allow their daughter to enter in defense. In many families women are grown in a different environment, which make them believe that they are weak. If a women have full support from family and she is confident enough, then she will be great asset for the country.
(23)
Jitendra Kumar said:
1 decade ago
Hello everyone,
As per my point of views, Every organisation or Individual institute do have some eligibility & section criteria for purpose of recruitment someone else. So that, the same army also has some criteria, if it the find fit in the same it's recruit them, it does not matter whether it's male or female.
At a one side, we are talking about uplifting the prevalent condition of women in the society and other side we refrain them join individual organisation or army.
I must conclude that the fitment for something which is not decided by the genders, no matter whether its man or women everyone would be treated equally and also give them equal chance to develop individually.
As per my point of views, Every organisation or Individual institute do have some eligibility & section criteria for purpose of recruitment someone else. So that, the same army also has some criteria, if it the find fit in the same it's recruit them, it does not matter whether it's male or female.
At a one side, we are talking about uplifting the prevalent condition of women in the society and other side we refrain them join individual organisation or army.
I must conclude that the fitment for something which is not decided by the genders, no matter whether its man or women everyone would be treated equally and also give them equal chance to develop individually.
(12)
Ritu said:
1 decade ago
Hi friends. I'll go with motion. Girls are weaker because of their anatomy when compared with boys. I know, no one can be as patriotic as Girls. They have ability to sacrifice even life. But why? We want minimum causalities. If we had 4th generation technology as in develop countries then would have gone against the motion.
As every coin has two faces, so here just difference in technology makes difference in two faces.
As every coin has two faces, so here just difference in technology makes difference in two faces.
(10)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers