Water resources should be nationalised

Hi friends this is raj. I think water resources should not be nationalized. Already we have many more problems and corruption cases in India if we start this project this time that also leads to corruption. So rather than thinking about nationalization of water resources we can build more DAMS across the river. That makes the to grow up the level of ground water and we can use those water on different seasons.

Actually what I feel if some knowledge is given to the rural as well as urban areas people about the future effect of the scarcity of water through campaign or many other media. A waterless state and we are searching water for the irrigation purpose and we are facing this problem often because we are left with no water from Karnataka state and the crops are dieing of no water source, so the water resource is to be nationalized is so important for a state like Tamilnadu.

Hii everyone. Earth is surrounded by oceans 75% of the earth is surrounded by water and rest of land but in 75% only 1% of water is useable so I am in favour of nationalisation of water resources because in our country every state has different geographical challenges For example; Punjab, Haryana and Kerela are water-rich states on the other side Rajasthan, Delhi and Maharashtra are water deficient states. These problems can be solved by nationalisation of water resources because after nationalisation the whole control of water resources are in the hand of the central government after which they can distribute water resources equally in all states of India by different ways.

I don't think so, if water resources are nationalized then that may be another reason to instigate war. Water is free flowing, a nations inability to maintain healthy water will cause the dirt n other things to flow to other nations causing differences. Even if we talk about division of water on the basis of states, every state will have its own demand.

We are already having enough agitations on the division of states then division water would be disastrous, every other territory will demand more and more. The best thing I feel that can be done is to allocate a strong distribution channel to ensure that water reaches the unprivileged parts of our country.

HI EVERYONE, Water resources should be nationalized, its shouldn't be state wise because we have many river, which overflows for the city every year, example IN BIHAR RIVER Gandak, Burhi Gandak and Bagmati, Kamla, Kosi and Mahananda " due to heavy rain in the catchment areas of the major rivers of Nepal which flows down to north Bihar. We facing disaster every year in many cities, so I think GOI should think about this topic seriously and my places where water is not there so people died bcs of water so. Its important to water resources should be nationalized.

As above friends told nationalization of water is not much necessary. Because definitely the power of constructing dams or some other source will be given to the political parties. There would be only corruption and not service to people.

But having nationalized water will help people of different states for their survival. For this the solution would be choosing a correct political leader who has mind to serve people.

Water is use for drinking, bathing, cooking, and washing. Water is most important for everyone living things. People can leave without water for 2days only 3% fresh water in the earth and 71% submarine water.

I do agree with advantages over nationalizing water resources, whereas there are more problem with we don't foresee to. The water resources being nationalized, water would be polluted all over the nation. There are many textile and leather industries spread across the country. They have been polluting the nearby rivers and lakes to dispose their waste. For the case, take Tirupur in Tamil nadu. The place which attracts all textile people of the country and abroad.

The underground water there is so contaminated that, they get coloured water everywhere they put a bore. If people have nearly contaminated the underground water itself, imagine the water which would be flowing on the surface. The nationalization of water can be done, if the government is very strict with their policies and rules though. Or nationalization would end as a disaster.

No, it should not be nationalized, as it is in local government only. If it is nationalized there is a chance to use that water to their political career. It creates a lot of problems between two states, otherwise if it is in local government they use that water according to their convenience and need. But central government make a committee take care of rivers and ensure water to every state through interlocking of rivers.

I completely agree with the topic. Rather than just nationalizing the water resources, there must be a separate committee of well educated people, which specifically work on how water resources must be utilized and distributed among states. But this authority must be genuine and shouldn't work under political pressures.