Should We Pursue our Policy of Dialogue with Pakistan?

Yes definitely we should not purse policy of dialogue with Pakistan. Kashmir is a integral part of India. Pakistan always interfer in internal matters of India and try to seize Kashmir. Due to militancy lakhs of people left their home in Kashmir and migrated to other states.

War is not solution. Rather than talk to Pakistan, India should talk to people who were migrated from Kashmir and local residents of Kashmir what they want and want to do exactly.

I am in favour of dialogue talks with Pakistan. Because every issue we want to solve we have to talk. There is need of bilateral talk at any type of problem, we want to solve. No matter the issue like Kashmir is irrelevant from Pakistan because Kashmir is part of India and will be the part in future too. We have to solve issues like infiltration, terrorism, and the fighting issues which are arising in the present scenario. We don't want the fight but also we don't want terrorism.

Pakistan has the character of backstepping always by some immortal agendas of terrorism. But we have to stop now this problem. For solving the problem, we need to talk and resolve in a systematic manner.

Hi friends.

According to my opinion we should not keep any relationship with Pakistan because whenever we are going to do something good in favor of Pakistan, they thinks we are taking some benefits.

In Pakistan there is many wisdom people they think only about themselves. Only promote terrorism and violation. All terrorist attack had executed by them. Pakistan always hearts us. So I think we should not keep any relationship with Pakistan.

Pakistan has always acted as a breeding hub for terrorism. The country is well aware of its consequences too. The Peshawar Attack proved a counter - strike to their pro - terrorism strategy. Repeated warnings had been given to it but how far the Government had acted upon this is a matter of question for almost all the countries.

However, a war will only lead to the loss of lives. Imagine the Kargil condition. The ratio of casualties was 3 : 1. Getting into their place and attacking them would be proving nothing but whimsicality. The Army does not even have the proper data as to how many terrorists are hiding there and what weapons they have in hand. Moreover, the commoners are the biggest sufferers. They are even witnessed to run short of the basic amenities of life.

Therefore, I don't think war is the best way out. Our strategies towards Pakistan should change completely. We should join hands with nations who are ready to give fights to terrorism and not against any specific nation. On top of that, Pakistan is our neighboring country. In no ways, should we do something that will hamper our common interests bluntly?

Hi Friends.

This is Unnikrishnan,

Pakistan every day attack India. We know India is a very fast developing nation we have strong Military and Defense power. Pakistan does not want peace because they nothing have to lose. But India not like that. Now a day's India react strongly. I think pakistan can't beat India in any way. And also pakistan can't stop terrorism.

Peace and war are the two strongest enemy. India have already tried to promote peace between the two countries but it fails spontaneously. Failure is the first step to success but those words are not applicable regarding the matter the more we try the more we fail.

So the Indian govt must Optional for bigger plan either may be by taking the issue to higher authority. If that doesn't work then we must also violate cease fire not only those dog's servant can fire the gun.

There is no doubt about it now - India has a problem, a big one, and it is Pakistan. But the real statement is, or should be - India has a problem, a big one, and it is the non-civil-government agents of Pakistan, who are out of civilian control totally.

I have worded this carefully, as I understand that. Pakistan's civil government may actually want peace with India. Pakistan's army may not entirely want disturbance this side of its border as they are at the receiving end of terror anyway.

Pakistan's non-civil actors (some fringes of its army, or the ISI, or some radical break-away groups or some radical individuals) may never want peace with India.

Some terror groups that are enemies of Pakistan may carry out attacks here in India as that suits their final motive (India gets angry, talks derail, skirmishes happen, Pakistan pays a price etc).

Irrespective of the subtleties of the argument describing today's situation, India is definitely a loser in it, as our sole worthy aim - raising the hundreds of millions out of poverty and into prosperity - gets defeated. Our focus dilutes. We deviate. The national debates change all over again.

Not good meanwhile, uncle Xi smiles in Beijing. He would be happy India is temporarily derailed. His huge One-Road-One-Belt strategy could ask for nothing else. If India loses its way, China gains in a big way (a crudely put statement that's true nonetheless especially given the increasing difficulty Xi faces in controlling democratic impulses of his citizens now).

So what can India do? We must ensure that a separate dedicated part of our foreign service is created solely for Pakistan and China issues (so that the larger world engagement does not suffer at all).

We must repeatedly remind everyone that prosperity and economic growth is crucial to the Indian dream, irrespective of terror attacks (as that alone will ensure our hotheads stay in control - poverty is big problem).

We develop trade linkages with Pakistan as economic ties cool sectarian tensions substantially. We remain united internally.

I believe that India should continue the dialogue process with. It is very important that India should have peaceful neighbours. We can have peace either by dialogue process or by using force. But war has never bought any solution to any problem. So dialogue is the only way out. We as a growing superpower should set an example for others that we don't want the use of force to settle the disputes between any country.

It a well known fact that we easily outnumber them in military counts as well as we have the far better technology than Pakistan. Pakistan can be defeated by means of force. Is that what we want? no. Maybe be one day Pakistan will realise that we are not their enemies but just a friend helping them to solve their own internal problems.

Peace can only be obtained by violent conflicts with the enemies & defeating them. It is not at all unfair to kill those who create terror among innocent people & cause ir-repairable loss to the society. They have no fellow feeling & humanity. If they do not come to the right track by peaceful negotiations, then there is a need of a war. It is truly said, "if you want peace then be prepared for a war".

After so many years of continued talks and efforts still this problem remains unresolved, there is no point in blaming each others but how ever this scenario has to be handled with military action rather than relying on peace talks.

Pakistan has always maintained its cruel state by remaining idle and silent in many terrorist attacks targeted towards India, the Mumbai terrorist attack is one such example. Even now In the case of Osama-bin-laden Pakistan tied up with ISI has helped him for years there by trying o deceive the entire world.

Peace talks can bear no fruits in case of Pakistan issue since they are not true to what they have to be and the policy of dialogue that is in practice has just curbed many soldiers lives at the border rather than harmony, so it is hard time for India to wake up.