Should We Pursue our Policy of Dialogue with Pakistan?

I agree with the points which are emphasized by my friends, but in my opinion, we need to improve our relationship with Pakistan. We must have cordial relationship with neighbor, because they would live with us, now tomorrow and day after tomorrow.

Even though they are violating ceasefire, and indulging in malicious sort of tasks.

We need to take our country to apex by economically, technically and medically. So that not only Pakistan but other countries like US or USA get afraid of us.

There are several factors which are essential for the bilateral talks.

* They must talk with youth and civilian of Pakistan, in terms of social and political issues, to remove their internal vendetta.

* Governance must be strong enough to control over terrorist and terror.

* They need to improve their level of literacy, because educated person don't like violence, they would create conducive atmosphere to live in, and we'll also respect to people.

* War creates vendetta and love leads to peace.

Policy of Dialogue with Pakistan is necessary but we cannot ignore the case of KARGIL when Nawaz Sharif and Atal Bihari is talking to each other and at the another side Pakistani millitants sending terrorism in our country. It is necessary that Pakistan first of all remove all terrorism areas which is known to India. Pakistan also capture all DON who create havoc in metropolitan area.

All of us know that Pakistan cannot remove these area because they want to attack any time which is not known to India. After Indira Gandhi any Prime Minister cannot take action regarding this matter but at this time water cross our heads Taliban, Osama is another challenge for us. India can also fighting with Naxals and inner terrorism which is not in the hands of our leader and government.

I think India should dialogue policy continue because if we will go for direct war then it will definitely bring for both countries but if we keep dialogue continue then it will keep our value up in UNO and it is necessity for us if we want to be permanent member of un security council.

And also as pak is taking step toward stop terrorism because it is harming pak more than India. So I think it will be good for us.

I agree with all of you. That bilateral talks are really no longer fruitful practically. But usage of arms also cannot be a solution. Perhaps now this duty lies with the young generation to overcome those old orthodox prejudices that has existed between the 2 nations over years. Because the importance of peace and harmony can be induced in the youngs only through the light of good education and knowledge, not within the orthodox who has made up the mind of holding arms, fighiting and holding the world hostile to their destructive powers. Destructive thinking and activities has to be overcome by succesful constructive ideas and thinking. Old practices like dialogue holds no good untill the message of peace reaches to the ears of the common citizens of the 2 countries.

1) Dialogue with Pakistan is little bit sweet and sour experience for India remain so for.

2) Pakistani basically formed on the basis of religion so extremists always has dominating factor in Relation between India and Pakistan.

3) India got great leader after independence and Pakistan failed to occupy the same.

4) Pakistan has had mostly military power in the past so relation with India also determined by the army.

5) Pakistan favours thought of good terrorism and bad terrorism.

6) Pakistan is now nuclear capable country. It has capability to deter India.

7) Pakistan is always supported by China which it call all weather friend.

8) China will never accept growing influence of India in the world.

9) Chinese company finds very easy way to earn profit in Pakistan.

10) China has acquired land in the form of gift from Pakistan to counter India all around.

11) India wants to lead in every field in the world. Leaving Pakistan alone and not to have talk will cause drawback before India.

12) Pakistan is a Muslim country and most part of the world are Muslim or mostly rich country are rich in resources.

13) To have place in greatest influence body like permanent seat in NSG or UNSC.

14) Pakistan is a our neighbour country. Talking with Pakistan will come in this consideration.

15) Pakistan is rich in some resources like productive agriculture land. So whenever requirement is there we can earn it easily like in case of onion shortfall. This will fulfill our requirement.

Hi everyone,

As we know that the main of pursue our dialogue of policy with Pakistan is to maintain the peace between the two country. Yes, we know that with the behaviour, we have not to forgive them but if also react like them we also kill the innocent people of Pakistan then what is the difference between India and Pakistan. As we know that our country is known for peace in the world. Hence we have create peace between the two country.

With my point of view, I think that as the present century known as nuclear century, hence, if war is create between us then their huge loss for both of the country, actually not only both country but it will also affect our neighboring country which is the initialization of world war. Our country is developing country and we have bright future. So I concluded that we have to maintain peace in a proper way so that we are also not affected by their terrorism.

The bilateral talks can bear fruits only when both the sides are seriously aiming to find the genuine solution to the problem. It simply wont help if we do it just for blaming one another or for the sake of doing something. Amicable talks with each other can be materialized only with the accent and cooperation of each participant. What has been witnessed so far is that Pakistan tries to appease the world community by pretending to be seriously indulged in peace-oriented talks while it keeps supporting terrorism on the other side. This dual-sided behavior wont certainly help to find any plausible solution and hence should be avoided by Pakistani side.

What India and Pakistan need is a bilateral peace process which does not get affected by incident of terrorism in borders.

It has become a routine that every time something happens in loc both government stop the ongoing peace process. It is a fact that ceasefire agreement is violated hundreds of time by both side and some incident gets hyped by media and it frustrates the people of both the countries. Government does nothing then stalling the peace process to placate angry people.

War is not a solution in my opinion, because it will create more hatred among the people of both countries. We already had four wars with Pakistan. We as well as Pakistan have lost many lives in these battles but we still do not have any peaceful accord with Pakistan.

Policy of Dialogue are just big words - "Agendas to discuss on and about " but sadly not much progress has been seen for all practical purposes.

Cross shooting still goes on at border between the two bitter enemies with neither willing to accept defeat. Both the countries spend enormous amounts for "defense" purposes which could be easily avoided. But it is easier said and done.

The major issue proving to be a roadblock in peace talks is the issue of J&K, POK being the icing on the cake. People of J&K are also divided amongst themselves regarding the issue.

India is very democracy country. In my humble opinion, I want to ask that how long will it go. By rising due to the issue we should not do war between Pakistan and India. There is no conclusion so we must indulge in each and other. So it will very spectacular. We have to understand of that huge of a problem. There is nothing mean to either attack of jealous. We are a human being. Survive together make impressive happiness. We must have humanity.