Should We Pursue our Policy of Dialogue with Pakistan?

According to me I think dialogue policy should be continued as it is the most peaceful solution. There can be two solution to maintain peace either policy dialogue or force. But peace can never be achieved through war. The attack by Pakistan is not done by common people of pakistan it is done by the terrorists. Government should better look at the grassroots of the problem, that how a common man turns into terrorist there can be hundred reasons behind it but one of the most common reason is unemployment. During policy dialogue these points should be kept forward by INDIAN government and pakistan's government should take care of it to eradicate this issue from the root.

Hello Everyone,

This is Ghanshyam.

I think we should continue our dialogue of peace with Pakistan because Pakistan is not the actual problem. Problem is the terrorism prevailing there who doesn't want peace between two country.

So whenever a talk of peace is done between two country they come into action. And as we are the one of the developing nation we have too many problems like poverty, corruption and many more, which can be grown to worst if we engage in war. And country like china will take advantage of the war. So, in my opinion we should continue the talk for peace with Pakistan.

Hello everyone.

According to me, the policy of dialogue should be continued but with strong effect and steps. We always try to maintain peace b/w two countries but perhaps Pakistan doesn't want it and we have seen this as its attitude in world bank issue due to little- increased height of 1. 5m of "BAGLIHAR DAM" on Chenab river, terrorism, 26/11 attack, Sarabjit hanged case, uri attack, Pathankot attack and nowadays Kulbhushan Jadhav hanging case and many more. It never showed the treaty behaviour, it always wants to harm our country.

Lord Krishna also said in Mahabharata that try all possible efforts of the treaty and not the occurrence of war because war will loss many of lives and economics although you can earn and develop again but you can't back the innocent lives that have gone in war. Pakistan illegally captured Kashmir and gave some part as a gift to china for making "SILK ROUTE" so that china can start a business with Africa Europe Gulf countries. India is developing country so if war will happen that we will be lost many and another country like china will get a benefit of it. So, firstly we should develope and be such a strong country that can handle such war.

"SURGICAL STRIKE" type answer should be given to Pakistan so that it will never try again to do such. If it kills 10 soldiers then we should kill their 100 soldiers. Thus steps fill the believe in citizens' heart towards the country and fear to the enemy. Only policy of dialogue is not sufficient till we don't take any strong decision but this decision should not be war.

Thank you.

There is no need to go to war with a country because on terrorism. It is not the country's fault. Every country has at least terrorist. Instead, India could help US in the war against terror.

If you go to war more people will die. Yes, already has declared war on terror. The UN is fighting as well there is no need to start a war that will kill millions. And it will definitely not get rid of the terrorists. Terrorists are everywhere. Yes, even India. Going to war with on country won't get rid of them. It might cause there to be more terrorism. In world's history, a war has always caused destruction and only destruction, nothing else. It will never lead to peace but only destruction and thereafter terrorism.

I may not be able to change your mind but I want you to ask yourself this. If India and Pakistan did go to war, what would you lose, what would your neighbor's lose, and what would your country lose.

If we consider that the war would solve the India-Pak issues then too, at which cost, everything would be destroyed and there would be the great loss of life, money, time and even property.

I think we should continue our peaceful talk with Pakistan because Pakistan is not the actual problem. Problem is the terrorism which doesn't want peace between Ind-Pak.

As you all must know that our country has too many social as well as economic problems like poverty, corruption and many more, which can be grown to worst if we engage in war.

People feel that Pakistan is a big problem for India, but I think they are totally wrong because Pakistan is not a problem but the non-civil government including ISI, and some groups of its army are the real culprits.

Today India's focus is to develop itself and eradicate the socio-economic problems that are prevailing in India. If go for a war against Pak it will distract us from our motive and will drown our country in the ocean of terror.

War can never be the solution. Not all Pakistanis are the culprit. There are some rotten fish who pollute the whole pond. There should be good relations with neighbors because a good relation strengthens the economy of the country and which intern fulfill the necessary demands of people of both countries which they are deprived of.

Hi everyone,

We are discussing in a very very sensitive matter whether India should continue peace talk with Pakistan or not, I would like to state my opinion in this regard that India should not talk with Pakistan regarding terrorism any more. Its a open secret that Pakistan has no control against terrorism as terrorism killing hundreds of people in their won country, then why for talk with Pakistan government. First Pakistan must get control against terrorism then India should talk with Pakistan.

Should India resume dialogue with Pakistan is the burning issue of today's politics. In Pakistan political decisions are made by army and ISI so why should we talk to government of Pakistan?if you look at the history every attempt of having a dialogue with Pakistan has created a chaos which indicates Pakistan doesn't want peaceful relationship with India. Terrorist groups are being operated from Pakistan and for Pakistan dialogue means only Kashmir.

Hi friend.

I think India should not have political talks with Pakistan. We have seen and experience many battles after independence. The more dialogue with Pakistan, the more cease fire violations, infiltrations at LOC. What have we to expect from Pakistan until Kashmir Problem is solved, . They too will never stop till they get Kashmir.

So why to talk and have a political dialogue with those Wolves who use Sheep's skin. Recently, both the Country PM had a political talks at UFA in Russia, soon after that there are lots infiltrators like firing at Indian border post at LOC killing a Jawan.

Very recently, after India celebrated to commemorates the KARGIL Martyrs on KARGIL DIVAS. There is an infiltration at Dinanagarh at Gurdaspur Dist of Punjab where SP of the District murdered at Cold-Blood killing innocent civilians and few policemen. Those militants were backed by Pakistan. Last but not the least.

Nothing will benefit out of Political talks with Pakistanis even if it holds talks a thousand times, the main reason being PAKISTAN is not controlled by PM but by Pakistani army.

So My dear friend what more can we expect from Pakistan. Instead we should give them a befitting reply to what they had done to us.

I think it is no use engaging in talks with Pakistan because you can hold talks only if both sides want to resolve problems but Pakistan wants only their wish to be fulfilled i.e. to have a plebiscite in Kashmir and for that they have gone to the extent of killing innocent civilians on the IB and claiming that India violated ceasefire to garner international attention. And the problem is Pakistan is mainly controlled by the army so talking to their political leaders won't help as even if they are interested in peace they have to listen to army as the government is dependent on them for survival.

I think instead of war we must concentrate on technological advancement of our country. Its better to make us so globally strong that Pakistan may not even dare to act against us. So we must continue our talks and keep making our country strong after all every war results in economic burden on the country and try to feel the emotions of families who have lost their own in such war.

We can change history but not geography. Clearly, our X Pm's these line are valid enough in any scenario. Lack of communication always create misunderstanding and give aggravates chance to deteriorate situation. Dialogue should be avoided when we finally in mood of clear declared war, but are we?

Surely we can drastically defeat Pakistan but war always ends with two way loss. We are developing country with bright future but its not the case with Pakistan, so its our duty to continue peaceful steps, as always fruitful tree bow down.