Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
184 comments Page 11 of 19.

Mohan Kumar said:   7 years ago
Yes, I too agree, that NOTA is a good way for voting if we don't want to give the vote to anyone. Then we can choose Nota as per our CHOICE.
(7)

Govind said:   2 years ago
I think the Nota option should be there because it will involve more people in the election.
There are a lot of people who just vote their valuable vote to anyone without thinking. If there were Nota option at least the wrong candidate wouldn't win.
(7)

Pratik said:   1 year ago
In my opinion, the NOTA option in the election is a sign of improvement in leaders because voters don't want to vote for them because they know about the party leader's work or not in society.

In the other hand, some people use the NOTA option for their things but they know about there pros and cons of selecting the NOTA option it is not used for their personal use.

When they select the NOTA option means the voter is not consistent the leader is not for that position and for society's improvement.
(7)

Sai mahesh vaddi said:   9 years ago
Hello friends,

In my point of view NOTA in soon leads to revolutionary changes in our election field because many educated people are not showing interest on voting just because of criminal politicians are the candidates. NOTA is the best for such a people. So there will be changes of increase in voting percentage if educated people comes forward to use their vote right.
(6)

Viral said:   9 years ago
Nowadays, we all face a real problem, to whom should we vote. Basically, we don't have any candidate who fulfils our expectation to be a genuine candidate than we have this NOTA option to show our protest to the election commission.

It's a way of complaint we can register with the election commission.

It will create data that can be used election commission to make some possible reform.

As if the candidates were not qualified to contest the election and we voted for them in favour or against or not at all, it shows that we don't have any problem with them.

And nothing will change. But on the other hand, if we use NOTA then it will create a protest against those candidates, and election commission has to do something to deal with the situation like create some threshold for contesting in an election like.

1. NO criminal background.

2. Education Qualification as Graduate.

3. Participation in Q&A session before the election, so that people can ask their questions on the Agenda proposed by him.

It will also reduce the moral of political parties which contest in the election on the basis of Money.

So in that way at the time of re-election, good candidates would not spend a lot of money on campaigning and that would reduce the corruption in future.

And educated candidates will work in the development of the concern constituencies.
(6)

Aruna said:   9 years ago
Hi friends,

In my point of view, NOTA is the best option for all the voters because it is the best way for electing the right person and educated person. In order to achieve this youth must come forward and show the people how NOTA helps us to select a good leader for developing our India.

NOTA is very important to each and every individual.
(6)

Supriya said:   9 years ago
I think NOTA is the best way to show the real place of corrupted politicians in government. If they are not able to get that position then we can choose NOTA.
(6)

Sravanthi said:   9 years ago
I am also in favor of NOTA because of political situation educated people are not interested in politics whereas uneducated people showing interest because of money and likes. They show there this satisfaction through NOTA.

The government should be formed based on NOTA because those are the real votes. Without giving any corruption. The people whose are not using their vote may be used for NOTA.

But NOTA must be taken that more votes than two parties but not full votes.
(6)

Gandhi bhomik said:   9 years ago
Yes, I think that there should be options of NOTA then the voter should have a chance that if the voter is not like to vote that all candidate then he can vote on None of the above and save his/her vote that any body can not use his vote.

I appeal to all that whenever there is a voting go and please vote if you don't like the candidates then vote to NOTA.

Thank you.
(6)

Anny said:   9 years ago
The NOTA choice for voters seems to be the favorable option for some of the citizens who actually understands about NOTA because if a citizen doesn't find any of the party fit to be their representatives for them than they have the particular option of NOTA to select. Besides all these negative views, apart from saying that I won't fit best, we must take this initiative to its next level by understanding that it is actually a need of our country to understand what a voter wants. I think it's an initial step for a far political vision by thinking about the voting procedure of our country and how we can raise it to the next level by adding some new useful techniques and tools like NOTA. And let the other parties understand where they are lacking. As our country support and follows the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which depicts a personal /individual preference also matters. Freedom of thought is there in our country then why a voter will not avail these options! Our government must aware the citizens about these changes that takes place within various intervals that how it can or can not be beneficial for them. This will help them in clearing the picture of politics as well as of politicians. And it will somehow bring transparency too.
(6)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.