Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
189 comments Page 12 of 19.
Anny said:
10 years ago
The NOTA choice for voters seems to be the favorable option for some of the citizens who actually understands about NOTA because if a citizen doesn't find any of the party fit to be their representatives for them than they have the particular option of NOTA to select. Besides all these negative views, apart from saying that I won't fit best, we must take this initiative to its next level by understanding that it is actually a need of our country to understand what a voter wants. I think it's an initial step for a far political vision by thinking about the voting procedure of our country and how we can raise it to the next level by adding some new useful techniques and tools like NOTA. And let the other parties understand where they are lacking. As our country support and follows the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which depicts a personal /individual preference also matters. Freedom of thought is there in our country then why a voter will not avail these options! Our government must aware the citizens about these changes that takes place within various intervals that how it can or can not be beneficial for them. This will help them in clearing the picture of politics as well as of politicians. And it will somehow bring transparency too.
(6)
Abhishek gupta 4244 said:
9 years ago
Yes, I agree.
NOTA is just a way so that people can have a choice to express their Bad opinions if any of all the candidates of all d parties and Select the best one for their region.
NOTA is just a way so that people can have a choice to express their Bad opinions if any of all the candidates of all d parties and Select the best one for their region.
(6)
Soniya Choudhary said:
9 years ago
Yes, As my opinion, voters should be given a NOTA choice because the negative point is also crucial to evaluate the best candidate for the country. It will give an outlook onto politician to the government. As well as those people who don't wanna give their votes to anyone because according to them all are corrupted here. For them, it will be a good way to show their disappointment. The NOTA votes will depict that how many people are disappointed and displeasure with government work.
So according to me, it's necessary to make a good government.
So according to me, it's necessary to make a good government.
(6)
Payal said:
8 years ago
Yes, NOTA should be given as an option to the voters. Generally, if a person doesn't like any of the people who is a candidate in the election, that person is forced to give a vote against his/her choice and willingness. So, it is a kind of creates pressure on them to vote. So, voting options should be open-ended just like a research questionnaire.
(6)
Aazima jan said:
3 years ago
I think an EVM Machine should have a NOTA option because it includes support for freedom of expression. Individuals possess the formal right to reject all candidates and express that none are sufficient for democratic self-determination.
(6)
Mahima tripathi said:
3 years ago
I think the NoTa option should be given because it helps the people to be involved in the election and have the right to not select anyone. It's totally their opinion.
(6)
Nitish said:
3 years ago
NOTA is a choice of person. In it, if a person is unable to find a good candidate in the election then he can press nota. By pressing these things many new good leaders would come up and look upon the demands of the people. It also helps in improving the working functionality of organizations. It can act as a feedback.
(6)
Sam said:
3 years ago
By providing nota as an option to the voters the democracy levels will increase along with the improvement of leadership. This is because, every single vote is important and where the win margin is less than the nota votes, parties will evaluate to get nota votes for their candidates in the next election. Hence candidates will be chosen who have worked at ground level.
(6)
Gnanapriya said:
1 year ago
In my opinion, NOTA option is not required.
Even though NOTA is chosen, the second majority party is declared as the winner.
Instead of that, there should be a rule that every citizen should know the laws and amendments of the nation in especially the candidate, and only educated candidates should be permitted for nomination.
Even though NOTA is chosen, the second majority party is declared as the winner.
Instead of that, there should be a rule that every citizen should know the laws and amendments of the nation in especially the candidate, and only educated candidates should be permitted for nomination.
(6)
KANNAN GANGADHARAN said:
1 decade ago
I strongly recommend NOTA is the best option at present all the politician have some form of corruption stain they have. Once they come to power they started milking money and started investing in across India and abroad. In the parliament, they fight inside and exchange words and they spoil the whole day without passing any bills. Every political party wants power so that they can easily mint money. They don't get punished for taking bribe also. We have seen so many incidents none of them are punished. It's very shame and it will encourage them to do to so in the near future. Many political candidates have so many criminal records and poor educational background. To curb these NOTA is the best option.
(5)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers