Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
184 comments Page 10 of 19.
Latish Kumar Reddy said:
9 years ago
Hello,
NOTA is a good option provided the voters use it for a good cause if they think the candidates are ineligible to participate in the election. Being a democratic country, the constitution provided us with a right to vote, still many educated persons are unwilling to vote. The NOTA system provides them with a vote to not to vote anyone and show their dissatisfaction towards the nominees. Though the ECI has provided NOTA as an option, their main motto is to increase the voting percentage. All the NOTA votes are considered invalid and despite the majority of the NOTA votes the highest majority candidate wins. With some changes in the NOTA system concentrating on abolishing corruption and ineligibility of the candidate. Even if there is 1% of NOTA is recorded in an election that would take lakhs of votes as invalid. There must be a limit to the NOTA votes such that exceeding this limit the ECI would propose a re-election by re-opening nominations.
I think this would make some difference in "giving NOTA choice" to the voters as it gives an opportunity in knowing the people's true opinion.
Thank you.
NOTA is a good option provided the voters use it for a good cause if they think the candidates are ineligible to participate in the election. Being a democratic country, the constitution provided us with a right to vote, still many educated persons are unwilling to vote. The NOTA system provides them with a vote to not to vote anyone and show their dissatisfaction towards the nominees. Though the ECI has provided NOTA as an option, their main motto is to increase the voting percentage. All the NOTA votes are considered invalid and despite the majority of the NOTA votes the highest majority candidate wins. With some changes in the NOTA system concentrating on abolishing corruption and ineligibility of the candidate. Even if there is 1% of NOTA is recorded in an election that would take lakhs of votes as invalid. There must be a limit to the NOTA votes such that exceeding this limit the ECI would propose a re-election by re-opening nominations.
I think this would make some difference in "giving NOTA choice" to the voters as it gives an opportunity in knowing the people's true opinion.
Thank you.
(8)
Avani said:
9 years ago
According to me, NOTA choice is the best answer a voter can give to the highly corrupted and uneducated politicians and the best way to select the deserving person. This should be introduced in our voting system as soon as possible.
This option will give the voter the right to vote as well as reject the unwanted persons if they don't feel them be deserving after analysing their previous criminal records and education.
Youth will be encouraged to use their right for a fruitful purpose and this can ultimately lead to the betterment of the society.
This option will give the voter the right to vote as well as reject the unwanted persons if they don't feel them be deserving after analysing their previous criminal records and education.
Youth will be encouraged to use their right for a fruitful purpose and this can ultimately lead to the betterment of the society.
(8)
Khushi said:
9 years ago
My point is, If many of them or the majority of them used NOTA then there will be no ruling party.
(8)
Isha maheshwari said:
9 years ago
According to me, voters should get NOTA choice because as we people know that in elections all the citizens are allowed to participate so poor are mostly never getting the facilities that they expect from the candidate. In our parliamentary system poor and low caste peoples opinions have no special value so if they will complain, then also no action will be taken on their opinion. So if there will be NOTA choice they will be satisfied with their vote and they will not feel bad.
(8)
Vinod Sao said:
9 years ago
The highest NOTA voted candidate should be barred to participate in next election.
(8)
Always alone said:
3 years ago
Good Evening Friends,
According to me, obviously Should give the NOTA option for the people for the election process. Because of knowing the people's common thinking about the election and political changing system.
Thanking You.
According to me, obviously Should give the NOTA option for the people for the election process. Because of knowing the people's common thinking about the election and political changing system.
Thanking You.
(8)
Ananya Singh said:
2 years ago
In my opinion,
NOTA as an option should be given to the voters. First, let us understand what is NOTA: None of the Above means people are not satisfied with the candidates or their opinion who are standing for the election, this way people will utilize their power of democracy. Rather than staying at home and criticising. This way people's participation in a vote also increases and their right to vote.
There is also some demerit like if the NOTA vote is less than 75% then these votes are not valid And there will be no re-election. Other than that some people will use the NOTA option for useless reasons. Now concluding my words having the option of NOTA will provide full-fledged use of democracy. And people's right of being sovereign at the time of election.
NOTA as an option should be given to the voters. First, let us understand what is NOTA: None of the Above means people are not satisfied with the candidates or their opinion who are standing for the election, this way people will utilize their power of democracy. Rather than staying at home and criticising. This way people's participation in a vote also increases and their right to vote.
There is also some demerit like if the NOTA vote is less than 75% then these votes are not valid And there will be no re-election. Other than that some people will use the NOTA option for useless reasons. Now concluding my words having the option of NOTA will provide full-fledged use of democracy. And people's right of being sovereign at the time of election.
(8)
Maneesha said:
9 years ago
Hello,
In my point of view, there should be an option for NOTA. If there is no option for NOTA definitely people have to vote for one candidate. The candidate may or may not has the capabilities to rule the country. This leads to many problems. If there is no option for NOTA that we are means people.
Are electing the wrong person to rule their country or village whatever it may be.
If we elect any person blindly that indirectly we are supporting the election of an incorrect person for a nation. We have the responsibility of electing the right person for bright future.
In my point of view, there should be an option for NOTA. If there is no option for NOTA definitely people have to vote for one candidate. The candidate may or may not has the capabilities to rule the country. This leads to many problems. If there is no option for NOTA that we are means people.
Are electing the wrong person to rule their country or village whatever it may be.
If we elect any person blindly that indirectly we are supporting the election of an incorrect person for a nation. We have the responsibility of electing the right person for bright future.
(7)
Shivam Amoli said:
8 years ago
Yes, NOTA is given to voters for option. It will be a great dicision towards the awareness of voters to our poltics. Some youngsters don't like any candidate in elections and we say that they don't like politics. So they give NOTA option in election just to say that none them is able to compete election.
(7)
Rajat said:
8 years ago
Yes, it is right to give an option of NOTA because in today's tine everything includes in the limit of politics. If there is a mishappening is their, political party arguing each other without know the exact reason behind the scenario. Today's politics is totally based on appeasement which is not good for the communal harmony of the country and people also censure it but people have no choice to change it. If NOTA is regulated then the political parties also realise and thinks for the betterment of people and they must focus on the development of the country.
(7)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers