Retirement Age for Politicians
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
136 comments Page 5 of 14.
Hina said:
5 years ago
Hello everyone.
I believe there should be a retirement age for politicians. We have retirement age in almost every field so why can't we have in politics?
If a person become a political leader then he will be a political leader till its last. As we know after certain time food starts detoriating means every food item has an expiry date because it loses its freshness and taste, this same is applicable in case of politicians as well. After sometime, people need new people to understand them.
I believe there should be a retirement age for politicians. We have retirement age in almost every field so why can't we have in politics?
If a person become a political leader then he will be a political leader till its last. As we know after certain time food starts detoriating means every food item has an expiry date because it loses its freshness and taste, this same is applicable in case of politicians as well. After sometime, people need new people to understand them.
(80)
Snehil said:
1 decade ago
Yes, Youth should be given chances to improve the country interior and also the new innovative ideas of youth can be more helpful.
As youth will join after retirement of person he can also provide new technology ideas which may give new powers to our army and other things which relay on the technology.
Talking about the experience, they may not have it but the way they will work will be more interesting to see. If age limit will be given the old ideas of 60's and 70's can be regenerated.
As youth will join after retirement of person he can also provide new technology ideas which may give new powers to our army and other things which relay on the technology.
Talking about the experience, they may not have it but the way they will work will be more interesting to see. If age limit will be given the old ideas of 60's and 70's can be regenerated.
(14)
Manoj kumar pal said:
10 years ago
Hello friends I agree with you that age doesn't matters for politician. But who have above 60 there are more experienced and also good decision making but they don't more enthusiastic, dynamic and energetic.
So I would like to said there are be the mentors of young politicians, who are energetic, enthusiastic, creative, innovative and know about more technology to solve the problems of our country. But in decision making they should proper consulting to experience leaders/politicians.
So I would like to said there are be the mentors of young politicians, who are energetic, enthusiastic, creative, innovative and know about more technology to solve the problems of our country. But in decision making they should proper consulting to experience leaders/politicians.
(10)
DIWAKAR said:
10 years ago
Hello everyone,
In my point of view age is not the factor by which you can judge the ability of the candidate, we have seen many example in our daily life that a 10th std. Student invent a new technology, while lot of engineers are not capable to do a simple thing.
So, according to me the creativity of mind depends on person not their age, we need a leader for the development of our country, and he must have potential to do new thing for the nation. Doesn't matter what age of he is.
In my point of view age is not the factor by which you can judge the ability of the candidate, we have seen many example in our daily life that a 10th std. Student invent a new technology, while lot of engineers are not capable to do a simple thing.
So, according to me the creativity of mind depends on person not their age, we need a leader for the development of our country, and he must have potential to do new thing for the nation. Doesn't matter what age of he is.
(18)
Shailender kumar singh said:
1 decade ago
Hi friends, this is Shailender Kumar Singh.
I think Indian politicians should be retirement because when they will retired then youth generation join and do good work. Old politicians the can not think develop our country they want earn money. Young generation wants good leader who can do something good for our country.
I am not saying all old politician not corrupt, government should give chance those politician who past work should good, today people wants corrupt free country.
I think Indian politicians should be retirement because when they will retired then youth generation join and do good work. Old politicians the can not think develop our country they want earn money. Young generation wants good leader who can do something good for our country.
I am not saying all old politician not corrupt, government should give chance those politician who past work should good, today people wants corrupt free country.
(4)
Avinash said:
5 years ago
There should be upper age for politician to take part in election. Because due no restriction in their retirement age young politician who have great vision and mission does not get easy chance to do something better for their locality. It should be mandatory to have retirement age so that more young mind come and make career in politics, It indirectly helps in improving the condition because new one try to take appreciation from society and for that he/she do their work sincerely.
(49)
Ganesh said:
10 months ago
Hi, I am Ganesh.
In my point of view, retiring from politics should not be for everyone who nominates in elections. I suggest the government keep the retirement age for who nominate but it should be in the following way.
i.e. As the level of the role in government he nominates for increase the retirement age also should be increased for eg: for prime minister, the upper age limit should be 90>, for chief minister, it should be 80> and soon for other roles.
Thank you.
In my point of view, retiring from politics should not be for everyone who nominates in elections. I suggest the government keep the retirement age for who nominate but it should be in the following way.
i.e. As the level of the role in government he nominates for increase the retirement age also should be increased for eg: for prime minister, the upper age limit should be 90>, for chief minister, it should be 80> and soon for other roles.
Thank you.
(2)
Sree said:
10 years ago
My opinion is there should be no age limit for retirement of politician because the senior citizen can known all the well development for the country. Nowadays most of the young persons are entering into the politics and they are making more illegal activities instead of giving them a chance we have to choose seniors for making good decisions. Most of the young persons don't know how to make decisions, but where has a senior person has a experience to make a right decision.
(12)
Manjit Singh said:
1 decade ago
According to me in India the politicians time period should be for maximum 8-10 years. Because when they have joined politics his mind thought more than 90% in developing the country. After this period his mind thought just on earning money.
So this is depends upon the mental ability of person. If they do best work for the country then I think there is no need to retired a person. Otherwise if does not work properly then also no need to retired there is need to terminate.
So this is depends upon the mental ability of person. If they do best work for the country then I think there is no need to retired a person. Otherwise if does not work properly then also no need to retired there is need to terminate.
(10)
Varunraj said:
10 years ago
My opinion and regarding of this topic.
We take government job they have required retirement age 58 but we take politics any retirement is not required so most of uneducated people think once became a politician we make money life long.
In India few party are ruled over the country how long they ruined the country they did not give any chance for youngsters so the youngsters did not come to the politics. That is the main reason India did not getting a successor employer.
We take government job they have required retirement age 58 but we take politics any retirement is not required so most of uneducated people think once became a politician we make money life long.
In India few party are ruled over the country how long they ruined the country they did not give any chance for youngsters so the youngsters did not come to the politics. That is the main reason India did not getting a successor employer.
(5)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers