Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
232 comments Page 4 of 24.
Nithish K said:
2 weeks ago
Hello everyone!
My personal thoughts about Economic growth are more important than Ecological protection.
- The earth wasn't created by us, so we don't have any right to spoil the nature of Ecology. If the economic growth will affect the ecology means we're doing something against nature, it will show the power of nature, it means disaster.
-Before implementation, economic growth industries should ensure that their activities do not affect the ecology.
-I think we're living in "Kaliyuga", because whether we're going to unpredictable, new viruses are spreading, animals are coming into living areas, etc.
-We're playing against nature, we need to protect ecology from human beings, because of all animals want to live on this planet, that's why the planet was created.
-Everyone needs to have awareness about Ecology.
"Save the Earth", Live the life with what nature has given us, it's enough to live.
My personal thoughts about Economic growth are more important than Ecological protection.
- The earth wasn't created by us, so we don't have any right to spoil the nature of Ecology. If the economic growth will affect the ecology means we're doing something against nature, it will show the power of nature, it means disaster.
-Before implementation, economic growth industries should ensure that their activities do not affect the ecology.
-I think we're living in "Kaliyuga", because whether we're going to unpredictable, new viruses are spreading, animals are coming into living areas, etc.
-We're playing against nature, we need to protect ecology from human beings, because of all animals want to live on this planet, that's why the planet was created.
-Everyone needs to have awareness about Ecology.
"Save the Earth", Live the life with what nature has given us, it's enough to live.
Praveen P said:
6 years ago
I am against, the economic growth is more important than ecological protection. Because, if we are not able to protect our environment, living beings and all, then how we will able talk about economic growth. Protection our ecological environment is the very serious topic and we can't take it lightly, we are not able to see that we are fully dependent on nature whether for breath or for resources if we aren't able to protect our environment then we will not able to uphold our life for too long.
For a country, economic growth should be the priority but it should not come above its natural vegetation, the growth we achieve by degrading our ecological life is actually a threat to that country.
If economic growth and ecological protection go hand in hand then only we are eligible to talk about growth, nothing is more important than our environment.
Save our Environment!
Thank You.
For a country, economic growth should be the priority but it should not come above its natural vegetation, the growth we achieve by degrading our ecological life is actually a threat to that country.
If economic growth and ecological protection go hand in hand then only we are eligible to talk about growth, nothing is more important than our environment.
Save our Environment!
Thank You.
(34)
Shivam K said:
7 years ago
Hello everyone,
As per me, we cannot decide the preference between ecological and economical growth, as both presume to be equivalently important.
Let also not forget that we all have come here as candidates for the job interview, i.e., we all are here to earn money, and why? Because we all want our economical growth. If we will individually grow economically then only the country will grow its economy.
And only a well economically grown country will be able to protect its ecology to the fullest.
So without economy there is no use of the protected ecology alone as it will also have necessities which need economy to grow.
Also, everyone must have come here with a vehicle releasing harmfull pollutants which had already disturbed the ecology, and all this just to grow our own economy.
So clearly, no one here is preferring ecological protection over economical growth.
As per me, we cannot decide the preference between ecological and economical growth, as both presume to be equivalently important.
Let also not forget that we all have come here as candidates for the job interview, i.e., we all are here to earn money, and why? Because we all want our economical growth. If we will individually grow economically then only the country will grow its economy.
And only a well economically grown country will be able to protect its ecology to the fullest.
So without economy there is no use of the protected ecology alone as it will also have necessities which need economy to grow.
Also, everyone must have come here with a vehicle releasing harmfull pollutants which had already disturbed the ecology, and all this just to grow our own economy.
So clearly, no one here is preferring ecological protection over economical growth.
(54)
Gulnaz said:
7 years ago
Hello Everyone,
In my views, ecological protection is more important than economic growth. What I feel is that there will be no longer economical growth if there is no ecological protection after some years. It's just that we all are here for giving interviews so that we will be an asset for a company and we will increase the production of a company which will raise its economy. Frankly speaking surely we all mostly focus to have more income, but when we analyse the main scenario of production we would see that most of the big industries are based on agriculture and natural resources on a root level. So if there will be no sustainable development then there will be an imbalance between the economic as well as ecological development which will hamper the whole economic growth because after 15 to 20 years there will be no natural resources left for any economical growth.
In my views, ecological protection is more important than economic growth. What I feel is that there will be no longer economical growth if there is no ecological protection after some years. It's just that we all are here for giving interviews so that we will be an asset for a company and we will increase the production of a company which will raise its economy. Frankly speaking surely we all mostly focus to have more income, but when we analyse the main scenario of production we would see that most of the big industries are based on agriculture and natural resources on a root level. So if there will be no sustainable development then there will be an imbalance between the economic as well as ecological development which will hamper the whole economic growth because after 15 to 20 years there will be no natural resources left for any economical growth.
(51)
Sai prudhvi raj said:
8 years ago
Hello everyone,
Of course, economic growth important even ecological protection but according me it is competitive world each and every human life is not less than a marathon to survive in these competitive world and to compete with the super power nations we don't have an another choice we should destroy nature, of course, no human has right to destroy nature but what we can do our nation has a lot issues from our neighbour countries to face them our economic growth is more important and India is young India where people have lot of dreams to live life like king size based on these conditions like opportunities, technology, threats from neighbour countries economic growth is important means mandatory my conclusion economic growth is important to with little loss in nature because with out economic growth we can't survive in this world as a human even as a country.
Of course, economic growth important even ecological protection but according me it is competitive world each and every human life is not less than a marathon to survive in these competitive world and to compete with the super power nations we don't have an another choice we should destroy nature, of course, no human has right to destroy nature but what we can do our nation has a lot issues from our neighbour countries to face them our economic growth is more important and India is young India where people have lot of dreams to live life like king size based on these conditions like opportunities, technology, threats from neighbour countries economic growth is important means mandatory my conclusion economic growth is important to with little loss in nature because with out economic growth we can't survive in this world as a human even as a country.
(12)
Sachin Kumar said:
8 years ago
Hi, guys.
In my nation, I am in favour of this topic talking about our nation although we need to emphasis on economic growth of our country as we all know our growth lies within the growth of the nation. What we called up development which includes economical growth, rise in employment, development of transportation means and systems, rising and improvement in globalisation sector. I would like to add we all should cooperate with government to develop these sectors but in a systematic manner as well within some ecological boundary so that our upcoming generation get a well-managed system, for instance, I like to give an example we must ensure to do double or triple plantation in response to deforestation, should keep our surroundings full of greenery.
At last I would like to conclude by saying e6conomical development is good till it has some ecological boundary.
In my nation, I am in favour of this topic talking about our nation although we need to emphasis on economic growth of our country as we all know our growth lies within the growth of the nation. What we called up development which includes economical growth, rise in employment, development of transportation means and systems, rising and improvement in globalisation sector. I would like to add we all should cooperate with government to develop these sectors but in a systematic manner as well within some ecological boundary so that our upcoming generation get a well-managed system, for instance, I like to give an example we must ensure to do double or triple plantation in response to deforestation, should keep our surroundings full of greenery.
At last I would like to conclude by saying e6conomical development is good till it has some ecological boundary.
(4)
Jay Yadav said:
9 months ago
Hello everyone, the topic is "Economic growth is more important than ecological growth".
So, according to me, it is not true that economic growth is more important than ecological growth, I think the growth of the environment and ecology should be our priority because we can see that if we are not able to protect our environment it may lead to certain problems like diseases and health issues in human being as well as non-human being. We can take the example of today's time and see there are lots of catastrophic events occurring due to climate change like, the melting of the glacier, fire, and rise in the sea level. This is all occurring because we are not able to maintain our environment due to that we can see that our economic growth is also hampering.
So, ecological growth should be our priority it will automatically lead to economic growth.
So, according to me, it is not true that economic growth is more important than ecological growth, I think the growth of the environment and ecology should be our priority because we can see that if we are not able to protect our environment it may lead to certain problems like diseases and health issues in human being as well as non-human being. We can take the example of today's time and see there are lots of catastrophic events occurring due to climate change like, the melting of the glacier, fire, and rise in the sea level. This is all occurring because we are not able to maintain our environment due to that we can see that our economic growth is also hampering.
So, ecological growth should be our priority it will automatically lead to economic growth.
(7)
PARIJAT said:
7 years ago
Hello everyone.
The opinion on this topic should be pretty obvious. Ecological protection and economic growth are directly proportional. Ecological protection means protecting the nature by making people respect the natural surroundings and also make them aware of the dire consequences of not preserving nature. Economic growth means increase in the capacity of the economy to produce goods and services. Now, among the factors leading to economic growth, natural resources is one of the factor. Efficient utilization of natural resources, like, land, air, water, minerals etc can boost the economic potential of a country. More we use the natural resources efficiently, lesser will be the chances of a country to face scarcity of resources at times of emergencies. Hence, this will lead to better productivity and satisfaction of human wants and needs.
The opinion on this topic should be pretty obvious. Ecological protection and economic growth are directly proportional. Ecological protection means protecting the nature by making people respect the natural surroundings and also make them aware of the dire consequences of not preserving nature. Economic growth means increase in the capacity of the economy to produce goods and services. Now, among the factors leading to economic growth, natural resources is one of the factor. Efficient utilization of natural resources, like, land, air, water, minerals etc can boost the economic potential of a country. More we use the natural resources efficiently, lesser will be the chances of a country to face scarcity of resources at times of emergencies. Hence, this will lead to better productivity and satisfaction of human wants and needs.
(15)
Rino jose said:
7 years ago
I am in favour of this topic talking about our nation although we need to emphasis on economic growth of our country as we all know our growth lies in the growth of the nation. What we called up development which includes economic growth, the rise in employment, development of transportation means and systems, rising and improvement in globalisation sector. I would like to add we all should cooperate with government to develop these sectors but in a systematic manner as well within some ecological boundary so that our upcoming generation get a well-managed system, for instance, I like to give an example we must ensure to do double or triple plantation in response to deforestation, should keep our surroundings full of greenery.
At last, I would like to conclude by saying e6conomical development is good until it has some ecological boundary.
At last, I would like to conclude by saying e6conomical development is good until it has some ecological boundary.
(21)
Indra Patel said:
8 years ago
Hi everyone,
According to me Ecological Protection is more Important than Economic Growth.
As Chanakya Said "As you will be near to nature, You will as closer to God (Energy). ", and as we are aiming for Materialistic world through Industrialization and all with the cost of Economical Imbalance and we can see now its effects on our weather and summer, monsoon and winter imbalance.
We are from Nature, Nature is not from Us.
We have no such Right to disturb Nature for our will.
If we see at global then,
People only wants Happiness and where they will find ? Obvi. At Natural Places.
Urban people will always looking for to go at Natural places in vacation and rural people have never aimed to visit an industry in city or else.
At the End,
Please try to Understand How people where living in Olden Days with the Care of Ecological balance.
According to me Ecological Protection is more Important than Economic Growth.
As Chanakya Said "As you will be near to nature, You will as closer to God (Energy). ", and as we are aiming for Materialistic world through Industrialization and all with the cost of Economical Imbalance and we can see now its effects on our weather and summer, monsoon and winter imbalance.
We are from Nature, Nature is not from Us.
We have no such Right to disturb Nature for our will.
If we see at global then,
People only wants Happiness and where they will find ? Obvi. At Natural Places.
Urban people will always looking for to go at Natural places in vacation and rural people have never aimed to visit an industry in city or else.
At the End,
Please try to Understand How people where living in Olden Days with the Care of Ecological balance.
(33)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers