Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
237 comments Page 24 of 24.

Pradeepa said:   10 years ago
Economic is very very important. Because economic is perform a great role of model world. Due to some culprits action gets affected graduates and unemployees. Increasing economic growth to develop ecologic.
(1)

Suresh said:   10 years ago
Only the economical growth give national growth base for the economical growth is ecological protection. In my point of view, based on our political strategy both of those not achieved. Based on news our country will get place in economically growth country before 1995. But what happened. That's all were happen by our politicians. Singapore had low facility and economical rate before 20th century. Now Singapore county money rate has worlds second position.
(1)

Navneet yadav said:   9 years ago
Hello to all.

I think both have their own aspects, but I think we have to provide more stress upon economy because it's very crucial to develop a nation and strengthen it.
(1)

Kowsalya said:   2 months ago
Economic growth is important for improving people's living standards and creating jobs.
It helps reduce poverty and supports national development.
Industries and businesses contribute to economic progress.
A strong economy provides better education and healthcare facilities.
Economic growth increases a country's income and infrastructure.
Without economic development, it is difficult to meet people's basic needs.
Therefore, economic growth is often considered more important than ecological protection.

Vaishnavi said:   4 weeks ago
In my opinion, I don't think it's an either-or.
But the default should flip: ecological stability first and then growth inside those boundaries.
Right now, growth often treats nature like an unlimited account, which doesn't work long-term.
But with clear limits, innovation can still happen, just not at the expense of the systems that keep us alive.

Ankush Kumar said:   2 weeks ago
Hello everyone, According me there should be balance between economic growth and ecologic growth.

I can not say that economic growth is not necessary while myself living in AC room and using all facilities at the same time by hurting nature.

The pollution in the air and water makes me disgusted and sad.

Many animal species are on the verge of extinction, and the biggest problem is that we are not giving attention to this because we already have our problems.

The human population is rising, so are the resource requirements; that's why the modern world is looking towards renewable resources to fulfil these demands by degrading nature as little as possible.

DIYA said:   5 days ago
Hello Everyone,

I would like to share my thoughts on the statement by saying that ecological protection is as important as economic growth.

As the population is rising, we see a rapid increase in urbanization, vehicle usage, deforestation, resource exploitation, etc. While economic growth provides jobs, infrastructure, and better living standards, it should not come at the cost of environmental destruction. Instead, I believe that there should be a balance between economic growth and ecological protection because both benefit us in different ways. In the end, we humans need to survive in this world too. So, I think there should be harmony between humans, animals, and nature to keep our lives going happily.


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.