Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
232 comments Page 18 of 24.

Vijay dangi said:   8 years ago
Hi, everyone.

In my point of view, the word "eco" is clearly relating to both ecology and economy. When we want to grow in the economy then we have to need to in the growth in ecology also for maintained balance between both for developed our nation.

Because the economy is an asset then the ecology is an aspect in which our country should develop.

We know our country is developing then we have focused on the economy more but little bit we also thinking about our ecology system otherwise imbalance in them have affected our infrastructure, lifestyles and we also polluted our earth.

I have to take two examples, like Japan the have one of the best economic structure and poor ecology structure.

And other is USA which have maintained both economy and ecology structure therefore it is clean and developed and powerful one.

So for developed our nation we have to focused on cleaning at beginning and after improving economically for made our India developed and strong.

Lastly, we can say that if a country ith economic growth and ecologically downfall is like a soldier without weapons.

Thank you.
(6)

Riya gupta said:   8 years ago
Hello,

As per as my concern, both are interlinked. As we know ecological protection is a process of protecting the natural environment for the betterment of individual thus if we succeed to protect our environment then it automatically helps us to growth economically.

Thank you.
(26)

Sangeeta said:   8 years ago
Ecology involves all the sources which a country needs for production and manufacturing. After this, production and manufacturing process takes place and contributes to our economic growth in the largest way. As well the human living is more important. If economic growths provide as a livelihood, a pollution free environment provides us good health. As we say health is wealth. Yet we need both aspects. Therefore we should increase our natural resources and protect that we have already in the environment. Increase production, manufacturing and constructional activities to rise economic growth but don't forget the base of economic growth which is ecology. So here we need economic growth without harming the environment. Be eco-friendly.
(23)

Surabhi mukherjee said:   8 years ago
Hi everyone,

Economic growth and ecological growth go hand in hand. Ecological growth increases economic growth increases and vice versa. We need sustainable development which says without hampering future generations need to fulfil your need. Ecological protection is necessary to continue with economic growth. We cannot afford to ignore ecology if we want to survive in the long run.

Thank you.
(9)

Raj said:   8 years ago
World is progressing very fast and with this progress a large of industries have been set up which have made human life easy but I has also deteriorated the quality of some or other way Increased pollution leading to more spread deadly diseases and half of the world is inhaling bad air in countries like china air is being sold in packets. So it's time for the human race to focus on ecological growth as well otherwise time will come when nature will take its toll on human life.
(3)

Nsb said:   8 years ago
According to me, both the economic growth and ecological protection are equally important in their aspects. For a safe and better future, economic growth should be achieved by protecting our environment. If we concentrate only on economic growth without caring about our ecology then whatever we achieve is not a development at all. Because, if the ecological balance is not maintained then it will result in natural hazards like earthquakes, cyclones, floods, global warming etc, which will destruct all our development. Moreover, due to the pollution, we may lose our health also if we are unhealthy then what is the need of all this development? and further development is not possible.

Moreover, the environment is a gift given by god. It must be protected and preserved. It has given a lot for our economic development, now it's our duty to pay for it by protecting it. For every step we make towards economic growth, we should check whether the step has any adverse effects on our environment. If yes, then we should figure out a solution so that no damage occurs to our nature. For eg- where thermal power plants are constructed, care must be taken that the fuel gases, smoke emitted into the air is within certain limits and the ash should be not deposited on earth directly before treating it.

Thus, if we keep a check on methods being implemented to achieve growth, then surely nature will be protected and ecological balance will be maintained. Mainly we will be healthy and we can live in a healthy developed society.
(31)

Rohit Kumar said:   8 years ago
In my opinion, ecological protection is more important than ecological growth. Actual both are dependent on each other, without protecting our ecology if we talk about the growth of economy it is just like to that we are making the choices of food without caring about our lives.

Finally, I want to say that if the ecological balance gets disturbed than it will surely vanish the economy, infrastructure in the result of natural disasters.
(3)

Rishabh said:   8 years ago
The very first thing which needs to be recognised is economy and ecology are relative as a matter of fact, alteration in one will have its effect on other. Though in my opinion preserving ecology should be given greater priority because-.

-> Many countries have climate based sectors as the backbone of an economy. An Environmental phenomenon like climate change can prove havoc to countries like India where agriculture contributes significantly towards GDP.

-> Economy depends on nature ability to provide resources and if pollution is hindering its ability to do so then it can be catastrophic to the human race. In fact, climate change has potential to send us into one of the biggest recession.

-> U. S. In 2016 saw 20 extreme weather events which cost them more than 30 billion dollars.

-> Climate change will cost Canada in billions due to climate change as it will affect Timber industry.

> Economical development is closely associated with infrastructural growth which has been one of the prime reasons behind deforestation which releases thousands of tonnes of carbon di oxide into atmosphere.
(6)

Neeraj said:   8 years ago
Hi, This is Neeraj.

Yes, of course, Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection because ecological protection is a part of economic growth. It is true that "Health is wealth" but if we are talking about economic growth so ecological protection automatic will take place in a positive way Because economic growth is a mixture of all things and ecological is one of them. If we are concerned development so we keep focusing on all things because each part is co-related with one another over the place if we are looking for economic growth it means we are giving force to elevate each thing.

Finally, I would say that if we miss any important thing of society like ecological protection to proper manage in its place so we can not consider our economic growth.
(6)

Nandini said:   8 years ago
Yes, of course, I too agree that economy growth is important for the growth of our country, but ecological growth is more important than that. Because by the growth of ecological protection only the human being can survive here. Since from few years, we have seen that so many chemical factories, cool-drink factories etc, are providing a huge amount of toxic gasses which polluting the environment and reducing the ecological growth.

In my point of view if we just concentrate on only the economic growth than how we can survive in this polluted environment. It is not necessary how much we earn, because if there is no survival then there is no value of any economic growth.
(6)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.